Re: Blank messages

2008-04-05 Thread SM
At 16:12 04-04-2008, Matt Kettler wrote: Out of curiosity, did you spot where the error in the formatting is? I looked at the message and failed to spot it... My initial reply was incorrect as it's not a MIME related problem. I viewed the message again after your question. There's an extra

Re: Blank messages

2008-04-05 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hmmm, maybe you schould decrease the score? Am 2008-04-03 12:47:12, schrieb Ed Kasky: > I can't seem to catch these emails with blank bodies. I upped the > BLANK_LINES_80_90 score to 3 but the email below didn't get a hit off the > rule. > > Is there another rule that I don't know about that i

Re: Blank messages

2008-04-05 Thread mouss
Ed Kasky wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Matt Kettler wrote: SM wrote: At 04:46 04-04-2008, Matt Kettler wrote: However, in this case it looks purely accidental. That appears to be a legitimate HTML document, or at least doesn't appear to be intentionally malformed. In this case, the message wa

Re: Blank messages

2008-04-04 Thread Ed Kasky
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Matt Kettler wrote: SM wrote: At 04:46 04-04-2008, Matt Kettler wrote: However, in this case it looks purely accidental. That appears to be a legitimate HTML document, or at least doesn't appear to be intentionally malformed. In this case, the message wasn't formatted co

Re: Blank messages

2008-04-04 Thread Matt Kettler
SM wrote: At 04:46 04-04-2008, Matt Kettler wrote: However, in this case it looks purely accidental. That appears to be a legitimate HTML document, or at least doesn't appear to be intentionally malformed. In this case, the message wasn't formatted correctly as it's going to be rendered as a

Re: Blank messages

2008-04-04 Thread SM
At 04:46 04-04-2008, Matt Kettler wrote: However, in this case it looks purely accidental. That appears to be a legitimate HTML document, or at least doesn't appear to be intentionally malformed. In this case, the message wasn't formatted correctly as it's going to be rendered as a blank mess

Re: Blank messages

2008-04-04 Thread Matt Kettler
Ed Kasky wrote: Odds are the message isn't blank.. Have you got a copy of the raw message before Eudora gets a hold of it? I should have looked at the raw message. Even in pine, it shows blank until you display the full headers: http://www.wrenkasky.com/spam/resipiscence.txt Quite a dif

Re: Blank messages

2008-04-03 Thread Ed Kasky
At 05:21 PM Thursday, 4/3/2008, Matt Kettler wrote -=> Ed Kasky wrote: At 01:29 PM Thursday, 4/3/2008, John Hardin wrote -=> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Ed Kasky wrote: X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.3 required=6.9 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE, RDNS_DYNAMIC,SARE_OBFU_MILLIONS autolearn=no version

Re: Blank messages

2008-04-03 Thread Matt Kettler
Ed Kasky wrote: At 01:29 PM Thursday, 4/3/2008, John Hardin wrote -=> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Ed Kasky wrote: X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.3 required=6.9 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE, RDNS_DYNAMIC,SARE_OBFU_MILLIONS autolearn=no version=3.2.4 How did it hit SARE_OBFU_MILLIONS with a blank

Re: Blank messages

2008-04-03 Thread Ed Kasky
At 01:29 PM Thursday, 4/3/2008, John Hardin wrote -=> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Ed Kasky wrote: X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.3 required=6.9 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE, RDNS_DYNAMIC,SARE_OBFU_MILLIONS autolearn=no version=3.2.4 How did it hit SARE_OBFU_MILLIONS with a blank body? I wish I

Re: Blank messages

2008-04-03 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Ed Kasky wrote: X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.3 required=6.9 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE, RDNS_DYNAMIC,SARE_OBFU_MILLIONS autolearn=no version=3.2.4 How did it hit SARE_OBFU_MILLIONS with a blank body? -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~

Re: Blank messages

2008-04-03 Thread Randy Ramsdell
Ed Kasky wrote: > I can't seem to catch these emails with blank bodies. I upped the > BLANK_LINES_80_90 score to 3 but the email below didn't get a hit off > the rule. > > Is there another rule that I don't know about that is designed for > blank message bodies? > > Thanks in advance on this one.

Re: Blank Messages

2005-12-13 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Iain Smith wrote: Hi, I'm currently getting FPs from users sending themselves mail from personal accounts with blank message bodies. Many times these messages are presumably reminders, and as such have valid subject lines. Often these messages contain attachments with the same filename as the su