Hmmm, maybe you schould decrease the score?
Am 2008-04-03 12:47:12, schrieb Ed Kasky:
> I can't seem to catch these emails with blank bodies. I upped the
> BLANK_LINES_80_90 score to 3 but the email below didn't get a hit off the
> rule.
>
> Is there another rule that I don't know about that is designed for
> blank message bodies?
>
> Thanks in advance on this one. These things have been plaguing me
> for some time and no matter how many I run through sa-learn, they
> never seem to score above a 5...
>
> >Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on
> >yoda.wrenkasky.com
> >X-Spam-Level: *****
> >X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.3 required=6.9 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE,
^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^
Here, your E-Mail WAS in the spamfolder I am currently checking...
> > RDNS_DYNAMIC,SARE_OBFU_MILLIONS autolearn=no version=3.2.4
<snip>
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
+49/177/9351947 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
