SM wrote:
At 04:46 04-04-2008, Matt Kettler wrote:However, in this case it looks purely accidental. That appears to be a legitimate HTML document, or at least doesn't appear to be intentionally malformed.In this case, the message wasn't formatted correctly as it's going to be rendered as a blank message (excluding attachments) by most MUAs.
Out of curiosity, did you spot where the error in the formatting is? I looked at the message and failed to spot it...
