day differenc now :)
Regards,Gregor
From: hg user
Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2024 13:58
To: Grega
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Yes
Il Mar 12 Nov 2024, 13:53 Grega via users
mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org
>
> As documented:
>
> # perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL
> NAME
> Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL - SQL Bayesian Storage Module
> Implementation
>
> DESCRIPTION
> This module implements a SQL based bayesian storage module. It's
> compatible with SQLite and possibly other standard SQ
Yes
Il Mar 12 Nov 2024, 13:53 Grega via users
ha scritto:
> If we used SQL and now switched to MySQL do we have to re-train bayes?
>
> --
> *From:* Bill Cole
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 12 November 2024 13:35
> *To:* users@spamassassin.apache.org
> *Subj
If we used SQL and now switched to MySQL do we have to re-train bayes?
From: Bill Cole
Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2024 13:35
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On 2024-11-12 at 00:33:13 UTC-0500 (Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:33:13
On 2024-11-12 at 00:33:13 UTC-0500 (Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:33:13 -0500)
Shawn Iverson
is rumored to have said:
[...]
> The "-D bayes" parameter was quite informative. Thank you. Turns out the
> database wasn't being read properly with the bayes_store_module in use.
> Maybe it has something to do wit
: users@spamassassin.apache.org; Grega
Cc: hg user
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 4:48 PM hg user
mailto:mercurialu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
In spamassassin 3 you could debug bayes points running command line
spamassassin with "-D bayes" parameter. I
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 4:48 PM hg user wrote:
> In spamassassin 3 you could debug bayes points running command line
> spamassassin with "-D bayes" parameter. I think you can in version 4 too.
>
> In the log all the tokens extracted from the message are listed with the
> points assigned, so you c
values like BAYES_05 and
>BAYES_99 ?
>
>
> Thanks for listening and any input 😊
>
> Regards,G
>
> --
> *From:* Grega via users
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 25 September 2024 20:02
> *To:* users@spamassassin.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Baye
via users
Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2024 20:02
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Oh god I`m idiot...
I had:
score BAYES_20 0.0
So now every mail has bayes score in it (changed it to score BAYES_20 0.1)
Still puzzling why I have no extreme low or
off.
From: Matija Nalis
Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2024 18:23
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:14:25PM +, Grega via users wrote:
> Why one has "BAYES_60" and other 2 not?
&
Hi.
Im on mysql backend.
Load is none ..
From: Matija Nalis
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 18:24
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:14:25PM +, Grega via users wrote:
> Why one
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 08:10:38AM +, Grega via users wrote:
> Also this:
>
> RuleDescriptionScoreTotalHamCol6SpamCol8
> BAYES_40Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40%0.002,784
> 2,72197.7632.3
> BAYES_50Bayes spam probability is 40 to 6
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:14:25PM +, Grega via users wrote:
> Why one has "BAYES_60" and other 2 not?
>
> 4. Race condition (IDK I`m not coder)
What backend are you using for storing bayer data?
I'm not yet on 4.x (Debian Stable FTW), but in SA 3.x default was a
local file storage (BDB?
via users
Sent: Monday, 23 September 2024 15:14
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Hi again.
In V4 there is something wrong with bayes...
I received 3 identical mails (1 external sender, 3 internal recipients) and
scores are like this:
2 X like
es to skip some?
4. Race condition (IDK I`m not coder)
5. Bayes behaves non consistent on BOTH installs I have it on
From: John Hardin
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2024 20:38
To: SpamAssassin-Users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024,
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024, Bill Cole wrote:
Please send any replies to the list only.
...or to Harald only.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C
Grega via users skrev den 2024-09-13 16:16:
Sorry guys if I replied to all, my intentions were not to spam :)
top posters :)
imho not impossible to request 3dr party list archives to make a
password for users, never mind
eggs came before chickens :=)
Sorry guys if I replied to all, my intentions were not to spam :)
From: Benny Pedersen
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2024 15:13
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Bill Cole skrev den 2024-09-13 15:03:
> Please send
On 2024-09-13 at 09:13:58 UTC-0400 (Fri, 13 Sep 2024 15:13:58 +0200)
Benny Pedersen
is rumored to have said:
Bill Cole skrev den 2024-09-13 15:03:
Please send any replies to the list only.
unsubscribe listarchivers ?
and make archived on apache.org with bugzilla login
don't know if it wil
On Friday 13 September 2024 at 15:13:58, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Bill Cole skrev den 2024-09-13 15:03:
> > Please send any replies to the list only.
>
> unsubscribe listarchivers ?
> and make archived on apache.org with bugzilla login
> don't know if it will help or not, but chicken and egg
I do
Bill Cole skrev den 2024-09-13 15:03:
Please send any replies to the list only.
unsubscribe listarchivers ?
and make archived on apache.org with bugzilla login
don't know if it will help or not, but chicken and egg
9-13 at 05:00:17 UTC-0400 (Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:00:17 +)
Grega
is rumored to have said:
Do you have V3 or V4 SA?
From: Reindl Harald (privat)
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2024 10:57
To: Grega; Bill Cole; Grega via users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Do you have V3 or V4 SA?
From: Reindl Harald (privat)
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2024 10:57
To: Grega; Bill Cole; Grega via users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
autolearn was always a blackbox
that below are the stats for the current month and that
September 2024 10:22
To: Grega; Bill Cole; Grega via users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Am 13.09.24 um 06:53 schrieb Grega via users:
> And I`m reconfiguring autolearn to -4 for HAM and 12 for SPAM to really
> auto-train on correct mails...
this is even more nonsense than autolearn
September 2024 21:38
To: Grega via users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On 2024-09-12 at 14:05:11 UTC-0400 (Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:05:11 +)
Grega via users
is rumored to have said:
Hi.
I have SA 4.0.1 configured it, all is good, except for bayes. It IS working, it
IS learning b
On 2024-09-12 at 14:05:11 UTC-0400 (Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:05:11 +)
Grega via users
is rumored to have said:
Hi.
I have SA 4.0.1 configured it, all is good, except for bayes. It IS
working, it IS learning but when it classifies mail it is really not
so decisive as it was in V3.
I have:
db
26 matches
Mail list logo
