> -Original Message-
> From: MaraBlue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 August 2007 01:09
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules
>
>
>
>
> Robert - elists-2 wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
>
>
> What's with this? There's no need for this on this list.
>
Maybe not... pray for victory over the moron stick for me please.
>
> You've asked many a question here that the above would have applied to
>
No kiddin? :-)
Im sure I would agree...
I imagine the ESR smart questions faq wou
On 8/18/2007 6:19 PM, Robert - elists wrote:
I have *always* run SA through MailScanner. This configuration is not new,
I
have run it this way for *years*. The only thing that's new is the version
of SA. As soon as I upgraded to v3.2.3, the problems started.
If you can't be helpful, I can certai
On 8/18/2007 12:43 PM, MaraBlue wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
MaraBlue wrote on Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:02:16 -0700 (PDT):
there several versions back.
I've run --lint -D, and SA is reading local.cf (I can post the log if
needed). The only other thing I changed a few days before this started
was
s
In my version 3.2.3 SA; File: 50_scores.cf sets the
score for EXTRA_MPART_TYPE fixed to a value of "1"
(per Bug 5110).
Sounds like a bad upgrade or platform package
build as the libraries don't appear to be matching
the version of SA?
I suspect that other stuff is not working right also.
J
>
> I've read this list for a long time. I've seen some really, truly STUPID
> questions come through...and seen them be answered, civilly, helpfully.
> The
> only difference is I don't have a masculine username. I truly hate coming
> off as a cranky feminist who complains I am being treated unf
Robert - elists-2 wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I have *always* run SA through MailScanner. This configuration is not
>> new,
>> I
>> have run it this way for *years*. The only thing that's new is the
>> version
>> of SA. As soon as I upgraded to v3.2.3, the problems started.
>>
>> If you can't be helpfu
>
> I have *always* run SA through MailScanner. This configuration is not new,
> I
> have run it this way for *years*. The only thing that's new is the version
> of SA. As soon as I upgraded to v3.2.3, the problems started.
>
> If you can't be helpful, I can certainly understand. But I don't nee
MaraBlue wrote on Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:46:34 -0700 (PDT):
> If you can't be helpful, I can certainly understand. But I don't need an
> argument, nor your attitude.
Thank you. It's not my fault that you don't understand the reasoning behind my
hints. You could have just done what I proposed instea
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
> MaraBlue wrote on Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:43:55 -0700 (PDT):
>
>> I know it's ignoring the rules in local.cf because of the spam that's
>> getting through. Some time back I changed EXTRA_MPART_TYPE to 4.0. Since
>> upgrading to v3.2.3 spam is getting tagged at the default 2
MaraBlue wrote on Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:43:55 -0700 (PDT):
> I know it's ignoring the rules in local.cf because of the spam that's
> getting through. Some time back I changed EXTRA_MPART_TYPE to 4.0. Since
> upgrading to v3.2.3 spam is getting tagged at the default 2.0 for that rule.
> Nothing has c
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
> Please provide the complete output of spamassassin --lint -D
>
Happy to:
<<< Log from 72.9.251.53 started August 17, 2007, 23:22:08 >>>
spamassassin --lint -D
[24276] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[24276] dbg: logger: logging level is D
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
> MaraBlue wrote on Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:02:16 -0700 (PDT):
>
>> there several versions back.
>>
>> I've run --lint -D, and SA is reading local.cf (I can post the log if
>> needed). The only other thing I changed a few days before this started
>> was
>> switching from usi
MaraBlue wrote on Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:02:16 -0700 (PDT):
> there several versions back.
>
> I've run --lint -D, and SA is reading local.cf (I can post the log if
> needed). The only other thing I changed a few days before this started was
> switching from using openprotect.com's SARE channels to
Please provide the complete output of spamassassin --lint -D
On 8/18/2007 3:02 AM, MaraBlue wrote:
I've used custom rules in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf since v3.1.7 with
never a problem. Since upgrading to v3.2.3, it's as if SpamAssassin isn't
seeing/registering the same rules that have a
15 matches
Mail list logo
