Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
> MaraBlue wrote on Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:43:55 -0700 (PDT):
>
>> I know it's ignoring the rules in local.cf because of the spam that's
>> getting through. Some time back I changed EXTRA_MPART_TYPE to 4.0. Since
>> upgrading to v3.2.3 spam is getting tagged at the default 2.0 for that
>> rule.
>> Nothing has changed to the local.cf, the only change is the SA version.
>
> Well, then you do *not* know. As I said you have to distinguish first, if
> the
> problem is that SA doesn't use it or if SA when used via MailScanner
> doesn't
> use it. This is a big difference and needs different troubleshooting, of
> course.
>
>
I have *always* run SA through MailScanner. This configuration is not new, I
have run it this way for *years*. The only thing that's new is the version
of SA. As soon as I upgraded to v3.2.3, the problems started.
If you can't be helpful, I can certainly understand. But I don't need an
argument, nor your attitude.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/v3.2.3-isn%27t-recognizing-local.cf-custom-rules-tf4289420.html#a12216513
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
