Peter H. Lemieux wrote:
OK, I've ransacked mailing lists for over an hour now and have yet to
find an answer to this question.
Until a couple of months ago I was running SA 2.64 under MailScanner
4.36.4, both installed from RPMs on a RedHat 7.3 system. I've been
migrating to a CentOS 4.4 box
On Friday, October 27, 2006, 2:05:44 PM, DAve DAve wrote:
> Dan Horne wrote:
>> Wietse Venema says that MailScanner uses unsupported methods to
>> manipulate the queue that could (and has) lead to lost email. I don't
>> know the full details, but it has been discussed much on the postfix
>> list.
Jeff,
> Not to start any flamewars, but does anyone have strong opinions
> on MailScanner versus Amavisd-new for use with postfix (and of
> course SpamAssassin and ClamAV)?
Of course I'm biased, but I'd be worried running program with
about 400 cases of calling system routines (I/O, file system,
Dan Horne wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 9:54 AM
To: SpamAssassin Users
Subject: MailScanner versus Amavisd-new with postfix
Not to start any flamewars, but does anyone have strong
opinions on MailScanner versus Am
note: I don't use mailscanner, so am only relaying what I saw on the postfix
list.
My understanding (based on foggy memory - search the list archives for a
better answer) is that MailScanner dipped into postfix queues using either
undocumented postfix APIs or by bypassing postfix entirely and dire
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 9:54 AM
> To: SpamAssassin Users
> Subject: MailScanner versus Amavisd-new with postfix
>
> Not to start any flamewars, but does anyone have strong
> opinions on MailScanner versus Amavis
Jeff Chan wrote:
Not to start any flamewars, but does anyone have strong opinions
on MailScanner versus Amavisd-new for use with postfix (and of
course SpamAssassin and ClamAV)?
In the old days it seemed Amavisd-new may have integrated better
with postfix, but is that no longer the case? Some f
Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/17/06, Gerhard Mourani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does someone was able to make MailScanner work correctly with Postfix??
I've MailScanner installed and configured to scan for Spam and Virus .
You'll probably get more help on the mailscanner list.
Thanks,
I was able
On Wed, October 18, 2006 12:41, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> Works Fine, many people run MailScanner and postfix with no problems.
more mailscanner users should read the postfix maillist and listen to authors
that program postfix or commit patches, all of them say please awoid using
mailscanner
oh
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, October 18, 2006 10:22, Martin Hepworth wrote:
any questions ask on the mailscanner list, we're a friendly bunch.
mailscanner is not well done for postfix, but works well with sendmail
for postfix i recommand to use amavisd-new, with btw olso works ok for sendma
On Wed, October 18, 2006 10:22, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> any questions ask on the mailscanner list, we're a friendly bunch.
mailscanner is not well done for postfix, but works well with sendmail
for postfix i recommand to use amavisd-new, with btw olso works ok for sendmail
i remember from my
Gerhard Mourani wrote:
Does someone was able to make MailScanner work correctly with Postfix??
I've MailScanner installed and configured to scan for Spam and Virus
through Postfix but look like it's not working as expected, I can see that
is start its job but still too much spam received. The onl
On 10/17/06, Gerhard Mourani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does someone was able to make MailScanner work correctly with Postfix??
I've MailScanner installed and configured to scan for Spam and Virus
You'll probably get more help on the mailscanner list.
--
Noel Jones
@#$%^& dnsbl.sorbs.net
i took dnsbl.sorbs.net out of my sendmail config
sorry, and thank you
At 7:21 AM +0100 1/12/06, Uwe wrote:
Steve,
People who would like the help you and using a Gmail Account will
receive this :
Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 8
Steve,
People who would like the help you and using a Gmail Account will receive this :
Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 8): 553 5.3.0 Rejected 64.233.184.194
found in dnsbl.sorbs.net
Nonsens ...
Uwe
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:48 -0800, Steve Maller wrote:
> OK, I've built and installed MailScanner 4.49 and SpamAssassin 3.1.0
> on a mostly stock Fedora Core 4 box. I'm running Sendmail with a
> bunch of RBLs and TLS enabled.
>
> Email comes through MailScanner, but whatever I do, I do not seem
d during normal mail
> processing? Or should I shut down MailScanner, rebuild, and re-start?
>
> Pierre
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Peacock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 10:39 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>
Pierre Thomson wrote:
I just upgraded to MailScanner 4.46.2 (current stable version) and SpamAssassin
3.1.0. I have five MailScanner child processes, and they restart themselves
every 4 hours.
On startup, the first of the five MS processes discovers that a Bayes rebuild
is due, and proceeds
Hi,
Turn off automatic Bayes rebuilds, and run a rebuild once a day using
sa-learn.
For example on *nix I use the following:
/usr/local/bin/sa-learn --force-expire
Which is run via cron once a day during the wee small hours.
> I just upgraded to MailScanner 4.46.2 (current stable version) an
Jason Humphrey wrote:
> Hey guys
> Thanks for your responses. I have spoken to afew guys on mailscanner mailing
> list and the said to run mailscanner in debug mode and got this error and
> the mailscanner dies.
> Can't locate object method "new" via package
> "Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit" ( pe
Hey guys
Thanks for your responses. I have spoken to afew guys on mailscanner mailing
list and the said to run mailscanner in debug mode and got this error and
the mailscanner dies.
Can't locate object method "new" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit" ( perhaps you forgot to load
"Mail::Sp
At 08:07 AM 8/22/2005, Jason Humphrey wrote:
This showing that mailscanner just seems to stop after a few seconds.I have
tested spamassassin with non-spam.txt and spam.txt and it works fine.
Anybody know where I need to look next to find
where its going wrong?
That log looks somewhat normal t
Jason Humphrey wrote:
Hi,
I've put mailscanner and spamassassin on a raq350 today and run into a
little problem
Mailscanner can deliver mail fine on its own with spamassassin disabled but
when I enable spamassassin no mail is processed the output from
"/etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail restart; tail -f
Kurt Buff wrote:
Sorry to reply to my own post, but here's a link for for your perusal:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2003-09/1730.html
Don't use Mailscanner with Postfix.
The author of Postfix states that it's not a good idea. I'll
take his word
for it.
Kurt
Agreed on th
Invalid wrote:
> Time error started Jan 30 19:15:04
Jan 30 19:15:04 addr3ss MailScanner[11506]: MailScanner E-Mail Virus
Scanner version 4.38.9 starting... Jan 30 19:15:04 addr3ss
update.virus.scanners: Delaying cron job up to 600 seconds Jan 30
19:15:04 addr3ss MailScanner[11506]: Could not r
> Time error started Jan 30 19:15:04
Jan 30 19:15:04 addr3ss MailScanner[11506]: MailScanner E-Mail Virus Scanner
version 4.38.9 starting...
Jan 30 19:15:04 addr3ss update.virus.scanners: Delaying cron job up to 600
seconds
Jan 30 19:15:04 addr3ss MailScanner[11506]: Could not read
directory
Sorry to reply to my own post, but here's a link for for your perusal:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2003-09/1730.html
> Don't use Mailscanner with Postfix.
>
> The author of Postfix states that it's not a good idea. I'll
> take his word
> for it.
>
> Kurt
>
> -Original M
Don't use Mailscanner with Postfix.
The author of Postfix states that it's not a good idea. I'll take his word
for it.
Kurt
-Original Message-
From: usha chowdary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 21:18
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Mailscanner
hi
Ia
Usha fix the following ...
Feb 1 10:33:33 ethnic postfix: succeeded
Feb 1 10:33:33 ethnic postfix/postsuper[2615]: warning: bogus file
name: hold/razor-agent.log
Feb 1 10:33:33 ethnic postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system
Feb 1 10:33:33 ethnic postfix: succeeded
Feb 1
Usha
quite a few things to correct on the install. Did you follow the postfix
how-to on the MS site? It looks like for a start you've changed the "Run
as User =" seting in MailScanner.conf
(http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/install/postfix.shtml)
Ask on the MS list, its a little off t
Hi!
Has somebody updated their Spamassassin old version to v3?
What version of Mailscanner uses?
Which version of Mailscanner I must install why Spamassassin 3 works
correctly?
Latest stabil version works nicely together with SA3. Julian even builded
complete installs to install SA3 also. Of for t
31 matches
Mail list logo
