Jeff Chan wrote:
Not to start any flamewars, but does anyone have strong opinions
on MailScanner versus Amavisd-new for use with postfix (and of
course SpamAssassin and ClamAV)?
In the old days it seemed Amavisd-new may have integrated better
with postfix, but is that no longer the case? Some folks say
MailScanner is faster and leaner.
What gives?
Jeff C.
Jeff
can't say I've compared the two, but I run MailScanner and it does have
a couple of neat features recently - it's own MD5 cache of recent spam
which speeds things up alot, and the inbuilt phishing testing (yeah ok
this has been in a while).
it also glues SA, 12 anti-virus engines, and it's own tests (like
executables which has saved me a few times before the av people have
updates).
horses for courses, but it's nice to have a choice of amavis-new OR
MailScanner.
--
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.
**********************************************************************
