[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Duane Hill wrote on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:09:02 + (UTC):
> Therefore, linux4michelle has no "real" control over SMTP level
> filtering.,
whatever, can we please have this off-topic discussion stopped? Thanks.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Be
> If I've been following this thread correctly, linux4michelle has
already
> stated he/she receives messages from their ISP. Therefore, rejecting
at
> the SMTP level will ultimately cause the ISP to be a source of
> backscatter (i.e. not receiving messages directly), which he/she can
not
> reje
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
Spamers are using MY E-Mail spaming
russian servers and now Ihave gotten nearly
200.000 backscatters which make my account unusable
specialy for my customers and peoples which
urgently need my help without passing over mailinglists...
So
> Spamers are using MY E-Mail spaming
> russian servers and now Ihave gotten nearly
> 200.000 backscatters which make my account unusable
> specialy for my customers and peoples which
> urgently need my help without passing over mailinglists...
So you do deliver the backscatter? Why
Am 2008-10-20 18:53:16, schrieb Matt Kettler:
> No, but if the post volume bothers you, I would strongly set your
> subscription to not email you the messages, and check them over any of
> the web archives noted on the website.
I do not know, what you mean, since I am set to "NOMAIL".
I have neve
Am 2008-10-20 09:43:40, schrieb Koopmann, Jan-Peter:
>
> > but unfortunately I get per day nearly 100 useles CarbonCopies
> and now 28.000 backscatters plus regular spam of 3-6000.
>
> What do you mean by "get"? You actually deliver those backscatters to
> your users? Or do you detect them q
Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> * Do not Cc: me, because I READ THIS LIST, if I write here *
> *Keine Cc: am mich, ich LESE DIESE LISTE wenn ich hier schreibe*
>
Am 2008-10-16 17:07:26, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
>
> On Thu, October 16, 2008 11:16, Justin Mason wrote:
> > +1. This is not a useful topic for this forum. Please drop it.
>
> drop sending cc when you olso post on maillist
FullACK!
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
* Do not Cc: me, because I READ THIS LIST, if I write here *
*Keine Cc: am mich, ich LESE DIESE LISTE wenn ich hier schreibe*
Am 200
> but unfortunately I get per day nearly 100 useles CarbonCopies
and now 28.000 backscatters plus regular spam of 3-6000.
What do you mean by "get"? You actually deliver those backscatters to
your users? Or do you detect them quite easily and drop the connection
during SMTP? Just curious...
Am 2008-10-15 17:53:01, schrieb mouss:
> if it's a big ISP, they simply won't care.
FullACK. You can only save ANY spam you get from them, then write a
letter and ask for damages. If they do not stop within e.g. 14 days,
you DoS them and let them know that it was YOU.
If they now sue you
Am 2008-10-15 17:46:00, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
>
> On Wed, October 15, 2008 11:36, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > DO NOT SEND ME CCs AGAIN or I will DoS your mailbox too! OK?
>
> why did you self send this msg cc ? :(
Because I want to be sur HE get the message
Normaly I get per day
+1 for dropping this thread.
However, as a SpamAssassin Project Management Committee (PMC) member I
do feel a short statement about the policies of this list is needed here.
CC + post is the normal commonly accepted format for this list, and is
the manner in which most members of the SpamAssassin
On Thu, October 16, 2008 11:16, Justin Mason wrote:
> +1. This is not a useful topic for this forum. Please drop it.
drop sending cc when you olso post on maillist
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
mouss writes:
> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> > On Wed, October 15, 2008 17:03, mouss wrote:
> >> you'll find that knowledgeable members do Cc.
> > lies
>
> Don't trust my words. check the archives:
>
> - SA: Justin Mason, Matt Kettler, John Hardin, ...
> - postfix: Wietse (yes, the author of postf
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Thu, October 16, 2008 00:38, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> Create a Reply-To: header when posting if you want a different behavior.
>>
>
> dont suggest that :)
>
>
Smarta..
:-)
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Thu, October 16, 2008 00:38, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> Create a Reply-To: header when posting if you want a different behavior.
>>
>
> dont suggest that :)
>
>
Why, it's the proper, RFC compliant way to do it. (and mind you, the
document out on the web is "Repl
On Thu, October 16, 2008 00:38, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Create a Reply-To: header when posting if you want a different behavior.
dont suggest that :)
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Wed, October 15, 2008 18:05, mouss wrote:
>
>
>> Don't trust my words. check the archives:
>>
>> - SA: Justin Mason, Matt Kettler, John Hardin, ...
>> - postfix: Wietse (yes, the author of postfix)
>> - dovecot: Timo (yes, the author of dovecot)
>> - take a look at the
Michelle Konzack a écrit :
> DO NOT SEND ME CCs AGAIN or I will DoS your mailbox too! OK?
you may need to fix your system. it's apparently resending the same
message again.
and again, I did not CC you. OK?
>
> I have NOT REQUESTED A Carbon Copy.
>
> Peoples sending me hundreds of unneeded C
On Wed, October 15, 2008 18:05, mouss wrote:
> Don't trust my words. check the archives:
>
> - SA: Justin Mason, Matt Kettler, John Hardin, ...
> - postfix: Wietse (yes, the author of postfix)
> - dovecot: Timo (yes, the author of dovecot)
> - take a look at the ietf-smtp archives. some names? Jo
Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On Wed, October 15, 2008 17:53, mouss wrote:
>> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
>>> why should internet be so diffrent then the snail mail ?
>> oh no. if "they" hear you, we'll have as much snail mail spam and phone
>> spam! BTW I do get a lot more phone spam now.
>
> you paid
Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On Wed, October 15, 2008 17:03, mouss wrote:
>> you'll find that knowledgeable members do Cc.
>
> lies
>
Don't trust my words. check the archives:
- SA: Justin Mason, Matt Kettler, John Hardin, ...
- postfix: Wietse (yes, the author of postfix)
- dovecot: Timo (yes, t
On Wed, October 15, 2008 17:53, mouss wrote:
> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
>> why should internet be so diffrent then the snail mail ?
> oh no. if "they" hear you, we'll have as much snail mail spam and phone
> spam! BTW I do get a lot more phone spam now.
you paid there call ? :)
all free services
Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On Wed, October 15, 2008 11:32, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
>> I pay 0.10 Euro/MByte and my current damage (since Friday last week) is
>> already over 3000 Euro because I was not @home and my Intranet Server
>> has tried to download my regular mail...
>
> so is life w
On Wed, October 15, 2008 17:03, mouss wrote:
> you'll find that knowledgeable members do Cc.
lies
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Wed, October 15, 2008 11:36, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> DO NOT SEND ME CCs AGAIN or I will DoS your mailbox too! OK?
why did you self send this msg cc ? :(
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Wed, October 15, 2008 11:32, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I pay 0.10 Euro/MByte and my current damage (since Friday last week) is
> already over 3000 Euro because I was not @home and my Intranet Server
> has tried to download my regular mail...
so is life when the postman newer got paid, blo
Michelle Konzack a écrit :
> DO NOT SEND ME CCs AGAIN
When did I CC you?
# grep -i "linux4michelle" /var/log/maillog.3
# grep -i "linux4michelle" /var/log/maillog.2
# grep -i "linux4michelle" /var/log/maillog.1
# grep -i "linux4michelle" /var/log/maillog.0
but you did CC me:
# grep -i "michell
DO NOT SEND ME CCs AGAIN or I will DoS your mailbox too! OK?
I have NOT REQUESTED A Carbon Copy.
Peoples sending me hundreds of unneeded CCs (over 2 MB per day) making
me very angry since this list IS SUBSCRIBER ONLY and I get the messages
IF I WRITE HERE!
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Even
Am 2008-10-13 18:57:09, schrieb mouss:
> that's bad. you're contributing to backscatter. if you don't reject at
> smtp time, don't bounce (unless you really know the domain you bounce
> was "involved").
The Messahes are checked and definitively coming from those domains.
I am on GSM/GPRS/EDGE/UMT
Michelle Konzack a écrit :
> Hi *;
>
> Am 2008-10-08 18:53:00, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>
>> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:39 +0200, mouss wrote:
>>
>>> I am learning foreign languages. it would be nice if backscatterers
>>> change the bounce text so that I learn more :-{
>>>
>>> "DIES IST
Hi *;
Am 2008-10-08 18:53:00, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:39 +0200, mouss wrote:
> > I am learning foreign languages. it would be nice if backscatterers
> > change the bounce text so that I learn more :-{
> >
> > "DIES IST NUR EINE WARNUNG."
I send such crap directly
33 matches
Mail list logo
