Den 2012-06-27 12:22, Ed Abbott skrev:
nearly perfect, remove domain-name-servers in request
Thanks Benny. I have removed domain-name-servers
in the request.
would be nice if debian/ubuntu maintainers read it if it can be some
suggestion on spamassassin install notes, since the default was
.
Ed
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp67067p100618.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Den 2012-06-22 16:20, Ed Abbott skrev:
Now that I have access to block lists, life is so much easier.
nearly perfect, remove domain-name-servers in request
I changed it:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/file/n100578/dhclient.conf.before
dhclient.conf.before
Here's my dhclient.conf after I changed it:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/file/n100578/dhclient.conf.after
dhclient.conf.after
Now that I have access to block lists, li
Reko Turja wrote:
> I'm myself bit leery for making stuff immutable that update scripts etc.
> usually assume having preset flags. Immutable in wrong place can make
> stuff fail in pretty interesting ways.
Well, my reason for *setting* the immutable bit was that by definition,
any automated widget
Ed Abbott wrote:
Reko Turja wrote:
Sorry for butting in a bit late...
Dont know what flavor of dhclient linux is running, but in freebsd this
kind
of unpleasantness can be avoided by editing /etc/dhclient.conf as
follows:
interface "" {
supersede domain-name "your.internal.tl
Den 2012-06-13 14:24, Ed Abbott skrev:
In other words, It would be nice to set my
nameserver to localhost permanently.
no one stops anyone from changing ones own dhcpd server to say
nameserver is 127.0.0.1, or other ip in rfc1918
its more simple doing it right in the router then fight all c
erwriting as one person has suggested.
However, I think your suggestion is more
ideal.
Ed Abbott
http://old.nabble.com/file/p34005355/dhclient.conf dhclient.conf
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p34005355.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sorry for butting in a bit late...
Ed Abbott wrote:
Kris Deugau wrote:
Just keep in mind that NetworkManager may meddle with your resolv.conf,
so you can either keep a watch and manually fix it, or do as I've taken
to doing and setting the immutable bit with "chattr +i" so it can't be
changed
Den 2012-06-09 12:53, Martin Gregorie skrev:
I see little or no advantage in using DHCP.
its nice to see when friends stop by to add there laptops to your lan
:=)
it just take a second
what i have done is to set all my own lan computers with static lan,
and all dynamic get dynamic ip, eg
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 15:21 -0700, Ed Abbott wrote:
>
> Looks like resolv.conf is overwritten each time I reboot.
> I'll implement your "chattr +i" suggestion after I've convinced
> myself that I have a stable solution that works each and every
> time.
>
In the current Fedora releases (since F15
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> A piece of advice: take a look at the rcs/ci/co commands, and use
> them to "version control" your configuration files.
Or use etckeeper: http://joeyh.name/code/etckeeper/
On Debian and Ubuntu, it's just an apt-get away...
Regards,
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Ed Abbott wrote:
Kris Deugau wrote:
Just keep in mind that NetworkManager may meddle with your resolv.conf,
so you can either keep a watch and manually fix it, or do as I've taken
to doing and setting the immutable bit with "chattr +i" so it can't be
changed.
Looks like r
Den 2012-06-09 00:21, Ed Abbott skrev:
Looks like resolv.conf is overwritten each time I reboot.
I'll implement your "chattr +i" suggestion after I've convinced
myself that I have a stable solution that works each and every
time.
chattr is not a gui for dhcp servers
For now, I'm using the "c
e resolve.conf
each time I reboot.
Ed
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33983805.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
m has address 127.0.0.2
Thanks for all the help.
Ed
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33983803.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> Den 2012-06-08 19:30, Ed Abbott skrev:
>
>> Is it really this simple?
>
> can i hire you now ? :=)
>
I should hire you! Thanks for all your
help!
Ed
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> Den 2012-06-08 19:30, Ed Abbott skrev:
>
>> Is it really this simple?
>
> can i hire you now ? :=)
>
I should hire you! Thanks for all your
help!
Ed
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> Den 2012-06-08 19:30, Ed Abbott skrev:
>
>> Is it really this simple?
>
> can i hire you now ? :=)
>
Thanks for all your help! You
are the one who should be hired.
Ed
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> Den 2012-06-08 19:30, Ed Abbott skrev:
>
>> Is it really this simple?
>
> can i hire you now ? :=)
>
Thanks for all your help! You
are the one who should be hired.
Ed
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Ed Abbott wrote:
Ed Abbott wrote:
I've contacted Time-Warner via online chat. Technical support responded
to my request to turn off DNS forwarding by saying "We don't offer DNS
forwarding." In other words, they had no idea what I was talking about.
Ed Abbott
My error.
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Ed Abbott wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
Ed, you said you've already installed BIND, that covers the "local,
caching" part. Now configure it to not forward requests.
Thank you John!
I think you may have given me the only answer that is going to
work. I've tried to get my ISP
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-06-08 20:29, Kevin A. McGrail skrev:
I think we can agree that local caching name server is the correct
solution in 99.9% of the cases, yes?
is 0.1% the geek people on spamassassin ? :=)
i just tryin to find where forwards is usefull when d
On 06/08/2012 07:30 PM, Ed Abbott wrote:
It works! The following test works!
$ cat spam.mbox | spamassassin -dt>temp
In other words, websiterepairguy.com is
passing all the tests and is no longer generating
false positives.
The 'spam.mbox' email is the one that was causing
false positives on
On 6/8/2012 12:57 PM, Ed Abbott wrote:
>
> John Hardin wrote:
>>
>> Ed, you said you've already installed BIND, that covers the "local,
>> caching" part. Now configure it to not forward requests.
>>
>>
> Thank you John!
>
> I think you may have given me the only answer that is going to
> work. I'
Den 2012-06-08 20:29, Kevin A. McGrail skrev:
I think we can agree that local caching name server is the correct
solution in 99.9% of the cases, yes?
is 0.1% the geek people on spamassassin ? :=)
i just tryin to find where forwards is usefull when dig +trace
example.org is not using forwards
Ed Abbott wrote:
> Here's my "new" resolv.conf:
>
> # Generated by NetworkManager
> domain maine.rr.com
> search maine.rr.com
> # nameserver 209.18.47.61
> # nameserver 209.18.47.62
> nameserver 127.0.0.1
>
> It works! The following test works!
>
> $ cat spam.mbox | spamassassin -dt >temp
>
>
Den 2012-06-08 19:30, Ed Abbott skrev:
Is it really this simple?
can i hire you now ? :=)
Den 2012-06-08 18:57, Ed Abbott skrev:
I think you may have given me the only answer that is going to
work. I've tried to get my ISP to allow me to opt out of DNS
redirection. No luck.
you can modify any files in your own host ?, where is the problem with
your isp delivery you wodka ? :=)
On 6/8/2012 2:12 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-06-08 18:22, Kevin A. McGrail skrev:
On 6/8/2012 12:17 PM, Ed Abbott wrote:
Any foreseeable problem with using Google Public DNS instead?
Yes. Google Public DNS can get blocked from RBLs because they end up
with too many queries. Your best
Den 2012-06-08 18:23, Ed Abbott skrev:
I'm sure I'm using the DNS servers for
my ISP as I've never done anything to
alter the servers I'm using. Here's my
/etc/resolv.conf:
[snip]
this is what dynamic clients such as dhcp client will use, servers
should have no problem running there own loc
Den 2012-06-08 18:22, Kevin A. McGrail skrev:
On 6/8/2012 12:17 PM, Ed Abbott wrote:
Any foreseeable problem with using Google Public DNS instead?
Yes. Google Public DNS can get blocked from RBLs because they end up
with too many queries. Your best bet with SA is to use your own
local
cach
Den 2012-06-08 18:17, Ed Abbott skrev:
The also said they do not support spamassassin. That's
understandable.
However, I wasn't asking them to support spamassassin. I just wanted
DNS to work properly.
if thay dont want to provide dns for your softare, whats more do thay
dont want to provid
domain 'websiterepairguy.com'.
It is no longer doing so.
Is it really this simple?
Ed Abbott
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33982947.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
127.0.0.1, I'm using
localhost which is the bind9 I installed the other
day.
Is this what you are saying?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33982867.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Abbott
>
My error. I meant to say DNS redirection.
I'm not sure which term I used when I talked
to Time-Warner. I may have used the wrong
term.
Ed Abbott
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33982836.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
an management and computer hardware resources?
I'm a lone individual on a home computer.
Ed Abbott
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33982797.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ed Abbott wrote:
> domain maine.rr.com
> search maine.rr.com
> nameserver 209.18.47.61
> nameserver 209.18.47.62
>
> rr stands for Road Runner and Road
> Runner is my ISP, also known as
> Time-Warner Cable.
OK. The first two lines can stay as-is.
Remove the current nameserver entries, and add "
Ed Abbott wrote:
> I've contacted Time-Warner via online chat. Technical support responded
> to my request to turn off DNS forwarding by saying "We don't offer DNS
> forwarding." In other words, they had no idea what I was talking about.
>From the blog link you posted, it sounds like there's an
e's my
/etc/resolv.conf:
# Generated by NetworkManager
domain maine.rr.com
search maine.rr.com
nameserver 209.18.47.61
nameserver 209.18.47.62
rr stands for Road Runner and Road
Runner is my ISP, also known as
Time-Warner Cable.
Ed Abbott
--
View this message in context:
http:
On 6/8/2012 12:17 PM, Ed Abbott wrote:
Any foreseeable problem with using Google Public DNS instead?
Yes. Google Public DNS can get blocked from RBLs because they end up
with too many queries. Your best bet with SA is to use your own local
caching nameserver.
Regards,
KAM
ication with them.
Any foreseeable problem with using Google Public DNS instead?
Thanks for all your responses so far. I live in a rural area in Maine,
USA. I'm in a town of about 20,000 people. Looks like I'm going to
have to keep my ISP.
Ed Abbott
--
View this message
Den 2012-06-07 21:03, David F. Skoll skrev:
It makes ISPs money from search and ad referrals. That's a good
[sic]
enough reason to lie to your customers, apparently.
counting how many ips is in spamhaus drop, where isp says thay stopped
bgp routíng to such bastards and in the same time clai
Den 2012-06-07 20:04, Ed Abbott skrev:
It looks like uribl.org is ignoring requests for both of these
domains and letting them time out. Is this a correct assumption?
are you using isp dns servers ?
show /etc/resolv.conf if unsure
uribl and dnsbl have startede to block dns querries from abbu
Den 2012-06-07 19:35, John Hardin skrev:
/etc/resolv.conf is where you'd start. If that says localhost (which
it should to use a local nameserver), then look at the configuration
of your local DNS server (likely BIND, likely /etc/bind/named.conf or
/etc/named/named.conf).
#/etc/resolv.conf
name
thinking.
Of course, you never get 100 percent. However, catching most spam
is very very helpful.
Ed Abbiott
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33979059.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ed Abbott wrote:
> You are helping clear up a lot of confusion. It seems
> that Time-Warner regularly hijacks DNS. Here's a blog
> post that details the experience of one user:
>
> http://blog.jonudell.net/2010/09/13/hijack-my-dns-and-i-will-be-annoyed-blame-me-and-i-will-go-ballistic/
> I assu
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:57:27 -0400
Kris Deugau wrote:
> If that seems clean, it's possible that your ISP has gone to the
> effort of silently redirecting all DNS requests to their own
> servers. (I can't think of any good reasons to do this, but some
> major ISPs seem to get bizarre directives f
Ed Abbott wrote:
> $ host websiterepairguy.com.multi.surbl.org
> websiterepairguy.com.multi.surbl.org has address 184.106.15.239
> websiterepairguy.com.multi.surbl.org has address 69.16.143.110
> Host websiterepairguy.com.multi.surbl.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
The first two responses here indicate
ound: 3(NXDOMAIN)
It looks like google.com and websiterepairguy.com have something in
common. It looks like uribl.org is ignoring requests for both of these
domains and letting them time out. Is this a correct assumption?
Ed Abbott
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.c
the DNS queries may be getting
modified somewhere along the way. I just don't know enough
about DNS yet to come up with a way to research this.
Ed Abbott
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33977175.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Ed Abbott wrote:
Axb wrote:
Are you forwarding your queries to a third party DNS?
Axb
Not intentionally. Am I doing so out of ignorance?
Maybe.
I'm a lone individual working from a home computer
and Time-Warner cable is my ISP. Do DNS queries
normally go to Time-Wa
s what may have gotten
me into trouble.
Thanks for your reply! Much appreciated!
Ed Abbott
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33977081.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ted rather
than re-typed. That's my lesson.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33977016.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
;ll try
to figure out a way to look into this.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33976986.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Kris Deugau wrote:
Ed Abbott wrote:
My domain name, websiterepairguy.com, is causing
spamassassin to give a false positive.
Checking from where I'm sitting, I don't see it listed.
If you're still getting hits on these rules there's a good chance that
the DNS cache you're
Ed Abbott wrote:
>
> My domain name, websiterepairguy.com, is causing
> spamassassin to give a false positive.
>
> Here are the tests that all give a false positive for
> websiterepairguy.com:
>
> 1.5 URIBL_RHS_DOB Contains an URI of a new domain (Day Old Bread)
> 0.6 URIBL_PH_SURBL
On 06/07/2012 01:37 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Axb:
in console check with:
host websitereapirguy.com.multi.uribl.com
websiterepairguy.com.multi.uribl.com
(note the typo)
Doh! - copy/paste previous author's error
(rndc flushname websitereapirguy.com)
anyway, still:
Host websiterepair
> I've now refreshed the DNS cache and restarted spamassassin by
> rebooting Linux. No change in result.
Maybe YOUR server is querying an upstream DNS server which has the
data cached.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin
ralf.hildebra...@charite.deCa
* Axb :
> in console check with:
>
> host websitereapirguy.com.multi.uribl.com
websiterepairguy.com.multi.uribl.com
(note the typo)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin
ralf.hildebra...@charite.deCampus Benjamin Franklin
http://www.charite.de
On 06/07/2012 01:19 PM, Ed Abbott wrote:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
perhaps try refreshing your dns caches and/or restart spamassassin
afterwards
I've flushed the cache with this command:
rndc flushname websitereapirguy.com
So far, no change.
I'll restart spamassassin by rebooting my
mac
://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33975169.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
xt. Not sure that I'm running
a daemon for spamassassin as I'm on a
single user system.
I assume spamassassin only runs when
I check email. That's my best guess.
However, I'm going to reboot anyway.
Ed Abbott
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positi
Am 07.06.2012 12:53, schrieb Ed Abbott:
> I've checked here to see if my domain is blocked:
>
> https://admin.uribl.com/
>
> When I lookup websiterepairguy,com, I get the
> following reply:
>
> NOT Listed on URIBL
perhaps try refreshing your dns caches and/or restart spamassassin
afterwards
--
ply.
My sincere apologies if this is a common problem that
I've not discovered an answer to because of the clumsiness
of my google searches.
Ed Abbott
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/False-Positive-on-Domain-Name-tp33975030p33975030.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
65 matches
Mail list logo
