On 6/8/2012 2:12 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-06-08 18:22, Kevin A. McGrail skrev:
On 6/8/2012 12:17 PM, Ed Abbott wrote:
Any foreseeable problem with using Google Public DNS instead?
Yes. Google Public DNS can get blocked from RBLs because they end up
with too many queries. Your best bet with SA is to use your own local
caching nameserver.
blocked is just not the right term, gives 127.0.0.255 will not work if
its blocked
Nuance above the level of the poor guy looking to fix his DNS ;-)
But I used blocked to encompass the concept of not getting correct,
unadultered answers.
I think we can agree that local caching name server is the correct
solution in 99.9% of the cases, yes?
regards,
KAM
