On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Doc Schneider wrote:
I always run sa-update -D to see what is happening.
Thank you, Doc. Copying the script to /usr/local/bin/ also made a
difference.
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:11:50PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
> I just did so. Nothing was returned.
sa-update provides no output by default. Run with -D to see what it's doing.
> I originally updated with CPAN. That left no executable binary file. Then
> I updated from the tarball. That mad
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Have you actually run sa-update?
I just did so. Nothing was returned.
There's usually no output if you run it without the debug option -D. An
exit code is returned though.
I have no idea what rules you're copying, whe
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Have you actually run sa-update?
I just did so. Nothing was returned.
I always run sa-update -D to see what is happening.
--
-Doc
Penguins: Do it on the ice.
10:12pm up 11 days, 7:10, 15 users, load average: 0.9
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Have you actually run sa-update?
I just did so. Nothing was returned.
I have no idea what rules you're copying, where you're copying them to, or
why your even copying them anywhere.
I originally updated with CPAN. That left no executable b
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Use sa-update.
Thank you, Daryl. I guess that I'm up to date on those rules so I need to
tweak elsewhere.
I read in the man page that the default directory is
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007. That directory does not exist
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Use sa-update.
Thank you, Daryl. I guess that I'm up to date on those rules so I need to
tweak elsewhere.
I read in the man page that the default directory is
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007. That directory does not exist here. I have
/usr/sha
Rich Shepard wrote:
The quantity of spam for various varieties of quicker-dicker-upper pills
into my inbox has increased over the past couple of weeks. The filters in
/usr/share/spamassassin/20_drugs.cf don't seem to be up to full strength.
Are there newer rules (I'm running 3.1.7) to cover
The quantity of spam for various varieties of quicker-dicker-upper pills
into my inbox has increased over the past couple of weeks. The filters in
/usr/share/spamassassin/20_drugs.cf don't seem to be up to full strength.
Are there newer rules (I'm running 3.1.7) to cover the changing landscap
