Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 1:36:24 AM, Matus wrote:
> Postfix can't use spamassassin directly, you _need_ to use something
> and that somethink
FYI: You can pipe to SpamAssassin directly from Postfix:
master.cf:
...
spamass unix - n n - 15 pipe
user=spamd argv=/usr/
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > You still did not explain us how do you connect postfix with spamassassin.
> > There are many ways to do this, but you have only denied all possible ways
> > we mentioned but you didn't provide the way you use.
On 06.06.11 09:01, asimhafeez wrote:
> Here is how
Just re-iterate spamassassin in any form will do nothing other than
yag the email. It's another programs job to do this. Personally I'd
recommend a mailscanner based solution to this problem
On Monday, 6 June 2011, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:30:10 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> wro
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:30:10 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
wrote:
>>> Postfix with SpamAssassin not any milter amavis or mailscanner.
>> main.cf:
>> ...
>> header_checks = pcre:$config_directory/pcre.header_checks
>> pcre.header_checks:
>> ...
>> # Discard Spam over 15.
>> /^X-Spam-Level: \*{15,}/ DISC
ied all possible ways
> we mentioned but you didn't provide the way you use.
Here is how to build postfix with spamassassin, i tried it.
http://www.akadia.com/services/postfix_spamassassin.html
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/delete-spam-instead-of-marking-as-spam-tp31777343p31784722.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 06.06.11 08:31, asimhafeez wrote:
> My scenario is as following.
>
> Internet --> "eth0" [ spam-filtering in bridging] "eth1" -->
> "LocalAreaConnection"[Email Hosting Server with multiple domains, directly
> connected over ethernet with spam-filtering machine]
you really don't need to repeat
un 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
>>>>>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking
>>>>> (rewriting)
>>>>> >> the
>>>>> >> emai
Duane Hill-2 wrote:
>
> Hello asimhafeez,
>
> Monday, June 6, 2011, 10:10:55 AM, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>>
>>>> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
>>>>
>>>&g
> >> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> >> In the above scenario I tried using postfix with spamassassin
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > postfix with spamassassin how?
> > This is the important question.
> > Milter? amavis? mailscanner?
On 06.06.11 08:10, asimhafeez wrot
Hello asimhafeez,
Monday, June 6, 2011, 10:10:55 AM, you wrote:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>
>>> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
>>>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
>>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
>> >> the
>> >> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
>
> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> > wrote:
> >> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
> >> the
> >> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
> >> In my scenario users mailboxes are hosted to another mach
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 10:32:11 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
wrote:
> If you think procmail can do this job, kindly let me know how can i use.
I
> don't think procmail can do this job because users mailboxes are on
remote
> machine.
procmail needs unix account, mua can run without one
users should just l
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> wrote:
>
>> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
> the
>> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
>> In my scenario users mailboxes are hosted to another
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
wrote:
> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
the
> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
> In my scenario users mailboxes are hosted to another machine and i want
to
> filter the spam in a separate machin
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 07:00 -0700, asimhafeez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting) the
> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
> In my scenario users mailboxes are hosted to another machine and i want to
> filter the spam in a separate
ailboxes are on remote
machine.
Martin Hepworth-2 wrote:
>
> Depends on how you are calling SA , what u do with the email after
> scanning isn't the job of SA that's down to another program
>
>
>
> On Sunday, 5 June 2011, asimhafeez wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
Hello asimhafeez,
Sunday, June 5, 2011, 3:00:02 PM, you wrote:
a> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting) the
a> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
If you're using procmail-
# All mail with a score higher than 10 is dumped to /dev/null
:0
* ^X
Depends on how you are calling SA , what u do with the email after
scanning isn't the job of SA that's down to another program
On Sunday, 5 June 2011, asimhafeez wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting) the
> emails as [
Hi,
Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting) the
emails as [SPAM] in subject.
In my scenario users mailboxes are hosted to another machine and i want to
filter the spam in a separate machine instead of filtering it on the email
hosting server.
Regards
--
View
Hi,
if your spam filtering happens via qmail scanner, you might want to get
latest version of that
Otherwise, if your final delivery is via .qmail files, you might find the
qtools package (from superscript.com or superscript.org) useful
Wolfgang Hamann
tarak ranjan wrote:
hi all,
i am f
amAssassin version 3.1.4 +
qmail
please help me out
That's a qmail question. SpamAssassin cannot delete spam. If you
don't get an answer here, you may want to try a qmail list.
Quoting Tarak Ranjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hi all,
> i am facing a serious problem regarding SPAM. now few mails are
> going to user's inbox and others are going to postmaster. but i want to
> drop/delete those mails from the server side.
>
> how can i able to do that.. i'm using SpamAss
hi all,
i am facing a serious problem regarding SPAM. now few mails are
going to user's inbox and others are going to postmaster. but i want to
drop/delete those mails from the server side.
how can i able to do that.. i'm using SpamAssassin version 3.1.4 +
qmail
please help me out
/tar
hello,
on my current spamassassin settings, if it detect an email as spam, the message
body of spam email will be modified as an attachment. the problem is if a user
create an email forwarder to other mail server. the other mail server will scan
the email (with spam message attached) and mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will Nordmeyer wrote:
> Craig,
>
> How do you have procmail set up to deliver to the spam vs. likely spam
> folders?
Use the "X-Spam-Level" marker. Anything with < 10 stars and a
"X-Spam-Status" of "Yes" gets put in a 'likely-spam' folder. Anything
e
Steven Dickenson wrote:
Couldn't find a thread like this hence this new one. Just wondering
what strategy people are using when it comes to dealing with email
that gets enough points to be considered as spam. Eg. being deleted
and quarantined, or delivered and quarantined etc.
I'm using sto
Couldn't find a thread like this hence this new one. Just wondering
what strategy people are using when it comes to dealing with email
that gets enough points to be considered as spam. Eg. being deleted
and quarantined, or delivered and quarantined etc.
I'm using store and deliver - is that
> Couldn't find a thread like this hence this new one. Just
> wondering what strategy people are using when it comes to
> dealing with email that gets enough points to be considered
> as spam. Eg. being deleted and quarantined, or delivered and
> quarantined etc.
In trying to find the a good comb
"Yusuf Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/05/2006 04:28:36 PM:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Couldn't find a thread like this hence this new one. Just wondering
> what strategy people are using when it comes to dealing with email
> that gets enough points to be considered as spam. Eg. being deleted
> and qua
Sur 2006-05-17, Yusuf Ahmed skribis:
Couldn't find a thread like this hence this new one. Just
wondering what strategy people are using when it comes to
dealing with email that gets enough points to be considered as
spam. Eg. being deleted and quarantined, or delivered and
quarantined etc.
Ed Kasky wrote:
>
> After reading quite a few opinions on this list I have come to the
> conclusion that if I delete an email sight unseen, how do I know
> that I am deleting a legitimate email?
You don't. That is why quite a few people (myself included) prefer to
deliver everything and let t
Craig,
How do you have procmail set up to deliver to the spam vs. likely spam
folders?
I have mine configured to folder anything with SPAM-STATUS: Yes (or
whatever that flag is)... but have been wondering about setting it up
to automatically delete anything scored in the 20+ range (for example
At 11:28 PM Tuesday, 5/16/2006, Yusuf Ahmed wrote -=>
Hi Guys,
Couldn't find a thread like this
hence this new one. Just wondering what strategy people are using when it
comes to dealing with email that gets enough points to be considered as
spam. Eg. being deleted and quarantined, or delivere
Encapsulate the message. Rewrite the header to include the score (NNN.D).
Sort all spam into a spam folder in the MUA. Sort the spam by subject and
double check the low scores while chortling over the high scores.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Sietse van Zanen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yusuf Ahmed wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Couldn't find a thread like this hence this new one. Just wondering what
> strategy people are using when it comes to dealing with email that gets
> enough points to be considered as spam. Eg. being deleted and
> qua
need
finetuning. I run most checks (URIBL, RAZOR2, DCC, BAYES, DNSBL)
-Sietse
From: Yusuf Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 17-May-06 8:28
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Delete spam or move to a folder?
Hi Guys,
Couldn't find a thread
Hi
Guys,
Couldn't find a
thread like this hence this new one. Just wondering what strategy people are
using when it comes to dealing with email that gets enough points to be
considered as spam. Eg. being deleted and quarantined, or delivered and
quarantined etc.
I'm using store and
del
- Original Message -
From: "Al Bogner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 4:54 PM
Subject: How to delete Spam automatically
> My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
> options to configure, like white and black
My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-access to
my
account and maybe I could try out how to delete spam automatically. It
looks
like amavis isn't used on this RedHat machine with kernel 2
Steven Stern wrote:
> If you can edit sendmail.mc and make a new sendmail configuration, then
> you could install spamass-milter. You can then set a reject condition
> for some spam score.
>
As far as I know cpanel servers use exim and the OP sounds like he is on
a shared hosting account.
--
Al Bogner wrote:
My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-access to my
account and maybe I could try out how to delete spam automatically. It looks
like amavis isn't used on this RedHat machine
Al Bogner wrote:
> My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
> options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-access to my
> account and maybe I could try out how to delete spam automatically. It looks
> like amavis isn't us
My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-access to my
account and maybe I could try out how to delete spam automatically. It looks
like amavis isn't used on this RedHat machine with kernel 2
Nigel Wilkinson wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> my spam directory used for bayes learning now holds over 3000 emails.
> If I delete them then next time I run sa-learn will I loose everything
> spamassassin has learnt. Also, same question for ham.
You can delete them. Sa-learn stores everything it needs t
Hi folks
my spam directory used for bayes learning now holds over 3000 emails. If I
delete them then next time I run sa-learn will I loose everything
spamassassin has learnt. Also, same question for ham.
Cheers
Nigel
pgpLufxE7wurH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:57:43PM +, Nigel Wilkinson wrote:
> my spam directory used for bayes learning now holds over 3000 emails. If I
> delete them then next time I run sa-learn will I loose everything
> spamassassin has learnt. Also, same question for ham.
When you sa-learn a message, t
From: "Rainer Sokoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:03:16AM -0800, jdow wrote:
>
> >to train its Bayes database on spam and ham messages. You can either
> >tell SpamAssassin to autolearn (which I do not use or recommend) or
>
> Why can't you recommend sa-autolearn? Fro
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:03:16AM -0800, jdow wrote:
>to train its Bayes database on spam and ham messages. You can either
>tell SpamAssassin to autolearn (which I do not use or recommend) or
Why can't you recommend sa-autolearn? From my experience (sa with
autolearning enabled, sitewide
lders within other tools like
milters, AmaVis, Procmail, and others.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Sizar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 2005 January, 25, Tuesday 02:34
Subject: how to pernamently delete spam messages with spam level over 12?
Hi,
I have two questions,
Hi,
I have two questions, that I couldn't find answer in spamassassin
documentation, FAQ and this group.
First one:
How to configure spamassassin to pernamently delete all spam messages
that has spam level over for example 12?
Second one:
The message was marked as a spam by spamassassin and qua
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It seems that the marked spam is never getting to this point, to have these
rules applied to it. It is being marked and then being sent to the user,
marked as spam, so that part is working.
If the headers are there, SA is doing its job. Ask th
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:33:08 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> It seems that the marked spam is never getting to this point, to have these
> rules applied to it. It is being marked and then being sent to the user,
> marked as spam, so that part is working. Is there another file somewhere
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> It seems that the marked spam is never getting to this point, to have these
> rules applied to it. It is being marked and then being sent to the user,
> marked as spam, so that part is working.
If the headers are there, SA is doing its job. Ask the procmail mailing
wrote on Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:33:08 -0500:
> I cannot configure spamassassin to delete spam.
>
sa doesn't do this! Do you mean to send mail to /dev/null with procmail?
> procmailrc
>
why not ask the procmail list?
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail
Kai
More of the same...
(spamassassin 2.64 on freeBSD 5.2.1)
I appreciate the help I have recieved so far, but it still doesn't work...
and yes, I have read the wiki, and I have googled the hell out of it...
I cannot configure spamassassin to delete spam. I have tried many, many
combinatio
56 matches
Mail list logo
