https://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html for details
Kind regards,
Tom
On 02-04-2025 18:20, Georg Faerber wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using SpamAssassin 4.0.1 and the ASN plugin, which works as
expected: relying on
add_header all ASN _ASN_
adds a header like
X-Spam-ASN: AS200069 Mailje
Great news, congratulations Giovanni!
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 6:48 AM Kevin A. McGrail
wrote:
> Congrats Giovanni! Thank you for all your service to Sidney.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025, 07:25 Sidney Markowitz wrote:
>
>> Please join me in welcoming Giovanni Bechis to the role of Chair of the
>>
unsubscribe
interested.
Rendered HTML body contents: https://dpaste.org/aBMN4
Full message body (less interesting): https://dpaste.org/meodC
Kind regards,
Tom
ges use of" message. Also, I noticed
Spamassassin 3.4.6 is being used. Would Spamassassin 4.0 have done a
better job at processing these headers?
Thanks!
Tom
rule. Filling syslog with messages about blocked queries might be a
better incentive/attention-grabber for ignorant/uninformed sysadmins to
resolve DNS related issues than a non-scoring hit in the message headers.
Kind regards,
Tom
that
stance. Maybe apply -2 in stead of -5 for this special case?
Or did I overlook something?
PS Not posting to the dev- list as I'm not subscribed there.
Kind regards,
Tom
ation of your query IPs will give you that capability.
Tom
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 10:16 AM Peter Ajamian
wrote:
> On 24/09/24 05:02, Bill Cole wrote:
> > Note
> > that as of 2024-03-01 (as documented at the DNSWL link above) they have
> > reduced the free limit to 10,000 q
You don't know the status of that infrastructure either. So I'd be
careful when using the public servers too. That's always true for public
gratis services, but maybe take some extra caution as the project seems
less alive.
Tom
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:53 PM Greg Troxel wrote:
> H
> Tom Bartel writes:
>
> > Starting March 1, 2024, we will allow up to 10,000 requests per user
> over a
> > 30-day time period. After the 10,000 requests, users must create a
> > MyValidity account to continue
ying. Any questions and/or
feedback, LMK.
Thanks,
Tom
Dear SpamAssassin user,
We wanted to send you a quick reminder of the upcoming changes to accessing
Validity reputation data through DNS.
Starting March 1, 2024, we will allow up to 10,000 requests per user over a
30-day time period. After
nstalled unbound. In addition to that, I
had to configure Spamassassin to point to the local resolver and my
URIBL_BLOCKED issue pretty much went away.
Tom
/spamassassin_current_release_4.0.x/sql/README
Kind reagards,
Tom
-OPTIONS
Kind regards,
Tom
se RHEL, RPMs
or CPAN. But I want to let you know that your questions on this list are
useful, so please continue.
Kind regards,
Tom
DNS server.
In the terms there is some talk about accounts etc. Did you try to sign up?
Kind regards
Tom
customers.
So you need to get in touch with them, not with the SA community (but as
you can see, we're happy to point you in the correct direction ;-> ).
Kind regards,
Tom
On 12-08-2021 22:16, Lukasz Maik wrote:
Dear John,
Sure, please find full tests results here:
https://www.mail-te
t actually doesn't exist).
Can someone explain why SA cannot support this type of syntax, or what
would be needed to get it supported? IMHO it makes it a lot easier for
end-users to understand a rule, and for rule developers to write or even
contribute new UTF-8-related rules, so it might be worth the effort to
get it supported?
Thanks in advance,
Tom
How about cloning outside your etc directory, for instance in
/usr/local? And then adding the correct paths to local.cf, as usual.
Kind regards,
Tom
On 08-04-2021 11:05, Michael Grant wrote:
I'm running debian on my mail server. I use etckeeper to track
changes in /etc.
Often
On 02-12-2020 16:18, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
X-Spam-Virus: _CLAMAVRESULT
I never integrated Clam using this plugin, but this seems a config typo
to be: there should be a Yes/No in there, and optionally a virus name.
Kind regards,
Tom
case I called Amazon. They immediately returned my call
and provided an e-mail address: stop-spoof...@amazon.com
-Ramon F. Herrera
Yes, I've sent many samples of phishing email messages to that Amazon
email address. I know it well. :)
Peace...
Tom
On 5/3/20 1:16 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2020, at 14:59, Tom Williams wrote:
>
>> Hi! I'm new to this mailing list, but not new to SpamAssassin. I've
>> used it on and off for a number years. :) Recently, (within the
>> past 6 months or so) I enabled it
amAssassin and DNS configuration.
Thanks!
Tom
On 5/2/20 3:25 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> I have too had a problem of this in my masscheck box. It is a cloud VM
> in Google Cloud and they do like to provide a /etc/resolv.conf for
> their own DNS which has been next to impossibl
fy
spam? Our host is running SpamAssassin 3.0 (shudders, I know it's ancient).
Thanks in advance!
Tom
Hey everyone,
I have a few questions about something I'm encountering with spamd.
I've noticed cases where a bounce message to the server results in spamd
'exceeded time limit'. It reaches the limit of 300+ seconds. In this
particular case, the message size is 564kB and contains an attachment.
No
Or maybe
your trusted_networks/internal_networks are misconfigured, so the
authentication is not properly detected?
Kind regards,
Tom
d to configure
their email client (or switch to a decent one).
Anyway, the main harm is done when the email adresses in the 'addr'
field and the 'name' are different, and that's detectable.
Kind regards,
Tom
a service they like
This is called open source, and it's a good thing. For details on the
philosophy behind it,
http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ is
a good read.
In short: if you like your project to prosper, put it on github for
everyone to see.
Ki
ink that such a DNSBL should be
actually used. Can you disclose which parties you found?
Kind regards,
Tom
On 06-02-19 14:40, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
The spammers at gremlin.ru have just created a homepage, with no
information on how to delist an IP.
Their fake dnsbl is listed a
On 10-10-18 21:51, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 10-10-18 21:05, Gokan Atmaca wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I'm using Postfix and Dovecot. I use Spamassassin as an antispam
>> service. I don't know how to do RBL checks.
>> How do I control RBL? (I don't want t
two different whitelists.)
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi,
See: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=postfix+rbl
Please ask further questions on the Postfix mailinglist, as you have a
postfix question, and this is the spamassassin list.
Kind regards,
Tom
self
I spent less than a day in setting this up, and it has been running
without issues ever since. When you're interested, read up on
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/NightlyMassCheck and try to set it
up. If you run into issues, other masscheckers can probably help you out.
Kind regards,
m when it ends up in your Spam folder, otherwise it's not.
And when moving around the message, you don't end up with non-spam
messages that have a spam tag in the subject (because you never added one).
Kind regards,
Tom
On 18-06-18 14:22, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> I'd lo
no
>
BAYES_00 means 'pretty sure it's ham'.
BAYES_99 means 'pretty sure it's spam'.
BAYES_50 means 'no idea'.
Scoring BAYES_50 at 4.3 is your scoring issue, nothing's wrong with
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD.
Kind regards,
Tom
> always the scor
Hi,
Sounds like a mimedefang question, not a spamassassin one. But did you
restart mimedefang after adding the rule?
Kind regards,
Tom
On 04-04-18 15:16, saqariden wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm using spamassassin with mimedefang, i have some custom rulesets, one
&g
ane
default. Not sure about the actual default in current SA code though.
Kind regards,
Tom
ONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,
> T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no
> autolearn_force=no
> version=3.4.1
How about: https://aws.amazon.com/forms/report-abuse
Kind regards,
Tom
omething like DKIM. Alex just
>> made me aware of http://dkimwl.org/ which looks brilliant. Exactly lines up
>> with how I filter and what I have been wanted to do for a couple of years
>> now. A community-driven clearing house for trusted senders.
>>
> dkimwl.org looks promising, but tell them their https cert has expired.
> Giovanni
>
Also, they refer to the TOU for acceptable usage, but both /terms and
/license have a 404.
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
you have configured in /etc/spamassassin?
Please show values for:
- dns_available
- dns_server
- clear_dns_servers
- dns_local_ports_permit
- dns_local_ports_avoid
- dns_local_ports_none
- dns_options
- dns_query_restriction
- clear_dns_query_restriction
- rbl_timeout
You can find the meaning of these (and
zon based on that, and then
subtract some points for everything that has '\bAmazon\b' is the
from:name. Header.
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ain: mailserver.company.tld
Automatic generated addresses would look like
john@mailserver.company.tld, these are easily recogized because
nobody uses them.
Kind regards,
Tom
; Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: (Can't locate object method
>>> "check_dkim_valid_envelopefrom" via package "Mail:
>>> [...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1369) line 305.
>>> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: )
>>
>> Th
est, skipping:
Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: (Can't locate object method
"check_dkim_valid_envelopefrom" via package "Mail:
[...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1369) line 305.
Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: )
Any idea? This is ubuntu 16.04, latest ubuntu package (3.4.1-3) for
spammassassin.
Kind regards,
Tom
Hi,
Note that on at least Ubuntu from some time ago, unbound was
automatically configured to take the dns servers that were received from
an upstream server during DHCP, and configure those as forwarders.
Can you show us output of: unbound-control list_forwards
Kind regards,
Tom
On 13
And manual testing when su'ing from the root role will not have
the same impact as running amavis using an init system.
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 17-07-17 16:39, Robert Kudyba wrote:
>
>> On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Tom Hendrikx > <mailto:t...@whyscream.net>> wrote:
>>
>> On 17-07-17 16:00, Robert Kudyba wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 17, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Antony Stone
>
5:28 storm spamd[28111]: spamd: clean message (-103.4/5.0)
> for spamd:1001 in 15.0 seconds, 1843 bytes.
> Jul 17 09:55:28 storm spamd[28111]: spamd: result: . -103 -
> ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,FROM_IS_TO,USER_IN_WHITELIST
> scantime=15.0,size=1843,user=spamd,uid=1001,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=::1,rport=53074,mid=<32889a456ed9c9911ff0034513796858.squirrel@ourdomain>,bayes=0.00,autolearn=no
> autolearn_force=no
> Jul 17 09:55:28 storm spamd[28041]: prefork: child states: II
>
The error is still the same. Do you even have access to those cloudmark
razor servers? Does razor work outside of spamassassin/amavisd?
Tom
would say '3.0', you would be asking why a message with score 3
wasn't blocked. So the 2.9 indicates that it's not 3 ;)
Kind regards,
Tom
On 25-04-17 10:27, Geoff Soper wrote:
> X-Spam-Status: No, Score=2.9
>
> X-Spam-Report:
>
> * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informa
rds,
Tom
On 04-04-17 23:09, Jim McLachlan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with the huge amount of messages being logged by
> spamassassin. I have around 10 active e-mail users on the system, none
> of whom have any unusual e-mail usage. This is what I've see
On 16-02-17 06:22, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-02-15 16:30, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>
>> Note that the period that you describe as 'seen by SA a bit later' is
>> typically less than a second.
>
> Not in my case. I have a custom Exim configuration where I
&g
sions
than their typical response time to new (types of) spam and their TTLs.
Kind regards,
Tom
say the same about my platform, but since this issue keeps
popping up I just applied for an account just to find out if my
contribution could help. I can't speculate so I'm just gonna try if it
helps :)
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ndicates that the message contains a large
> amount of non-latin1 text? I do get a lot of legitimate non-ISO-8859-1
> messages but usually it's just a name or at most an address. So less
> than 100 bytes.
>
Please start a new thread and show us a sample of such a message, and
the scores you are seeing with your setup.
Kind regards,
Tom
On 29-12-16 19:40, Marc Stürmer wrote:
> Zitat von Tom Hendrikx :
>
>> Did you file a ticket with them? I'm curious as to what they are saying
>> about it.
>
> Actually I got this info by their phone support, and the info was back
> then it's not supporte
.
>
Did you file a ticket with them? I'm curious as to what they are saying
about it.
Kind regards,
Tom
is OK with SPF, DKIM, DMARC
checks.
If you expect to have any useful mail contact by relaying mail with a
gmail/aol/yahoo sender envelope through your own mail platform, (i.e.
delivering without using their SMTP relay), you're dreaming. The
freemail providers are making that harder and harder by deploying DMARC
p=reject.
The question arises: why would you use a Gmail address at all if you
don't want to use their services?
Regards,
Tom
gt;>> instead of
>>> uridnsbl
>>>
>>> so no "as said the syntax seems to be correct" it is NOT
>
> again: what about fix
> https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_URIDNSBL.html
> which says still:
>
Please suggest an proved documentation text so the devs can add it.
Kind regards,
Tom
line = self.fp.readline()
> KeyboardInterrupt
>
This happens when you CTRL-C the pyzor client (KeyboardInterrupt) that
is waiting for data at standard input. See 'man pyzor' for details.
What were you trying to achieve?
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ur, set RESOLVCONF_FORWARDERS=false in
/etc/default/unbound, and restart unbound.
Regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ahoney
>
How about using "whitelist_to r...@example.tld", possibly with an
adapted negative score for the associated rule (which is not really
clear from the documentation)?
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
are
> certain that a mail is spam which is *not* backed by a single header,
> deep inspection or not
>
That is true, but I think you should put your money where your mouth is:
just run the masscheck on your corpus and send the results to the devs
for inspection. If it's not working, you lost nothing. If the data *is*
useful, we all win from your work by getting better scores.
Just my 2 cents.
Regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
:
chown spamuser:wheel
chmod 0660
Then restart spamd and see of it doesn't complain. This should allow
access for spamd and for users in the wheel group (administrative accounts).
Regards,
Tom
On 03-03-16 16:35, Robert Chalmers wrote:
> ok, I can see that. Interesting I missed i
; The only thing I’ve been contemplating is a local spamtrap and DNSBL.
> We have a site that’s regularly trawled for email addresses, so
> seeding it should not be too difficult…
>
Hi,
You want to give the RBLs a bit more time to kick in, you could consider
greylisting (or postscreen after-220 checks which also cause a delay and
a retry).
Regards,
Tom
mailing list.
IMHO, removing the markup is simply not a good idea: probably easier
to use headers only (i.e. no subject tagging), and then use IMAP flags
to highlight spam messages for the user. These can be unset later
without 'nasty' tricks.
Regards,
Tom
-BEGIN P
On 26-01-16 10:33, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.01.2016 um 09:45 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
>> On 25-01-16 16:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 25.01.2016 um 16:22 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>>>> On 25.01.16 15:17, Reindl Harald wrote:
>&
) could need an upgrade.
In any way, it would be interesting to see what type of ham mail
triggers such a rule when masscheck allows such a high score, before
starting an argument about it.
Regards,
Tom
and word-pairs. I'm not
> sure the extra storage for more than pairs is justifiable.
>
Dspam implements up to 5 words, including wildcards for intermediate
words. See OSB and SBPH methods explained at
http://wiki.linuxwall.info/doku.php/en:ressources:dossiers:dspam#content
_tokeniz
ure that my own SPF record is
correct, so for messages that fail my own SPF record, I want a stricter
policy (i.e. a higher score, or a plain reject).
If this is what you mean, then a meta rule that combines your envelope
sender domain with SPF_FAIL would be a correct solution.
Or you could add something like below, which adds a penalty for *all*
messages using your domain, and SPF saves the real ones.
whitelist_from_spf: *@example.tld (your domain)
header Return-Path =~ example.tld
Regards,
Tom
Thank you both, please stop this pissing contest.
On 24-11-15 12:35, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
>> Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-11-24 11:56:
>>
>>> it's the exim of the ISP
>>
>> with old version of exim
>
> it's still the exim of the ISP
>
>>> it
variables like
> SMPTMAILFROM
> and SMTPRCPTTO and either does nothing or outputs a single line of text like
> E550 your mail is not welcome. Go away
Nobody should be sending from a different mail server. We use IMAPS and
authenticated SMTPS for
external users (mobiles, laptops, etc.).
Thanks,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Benny,
thanks for your email.
On 28/09/15 13:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Tom Robinson skrev den 2015-09-28 05:02:
>
>> From tena...@qka.com Thu Sep 24 13:29:50 2015
>
> is this the envelope sender domain ?
I believe so. How can I be sure?
>
>> From:
gards,
Tom
From tena...@qka.com Thu Sep 24 13:29:50 2015
MIME-Version:1.0
X-Spam-Status:No, hits=2.8 required=5.0
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Authsource:ga8r9nl0j6u7...@motec.com.au
Content-Type:multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_Next_54920_1367254513.7341918864818&q
I implemented this at my previous $workjob, using a webservice in stead
of a DNSBL, and limiting the amount of requests by selecting a max of 10
URLs picked randomly from the message.
Client-side performance was OK, but the dataset in the BL was meager,
making the test results not very useful.
Using a DNSBL in stead of a webservice should be fairly easy, by using a
hash values of the URIs in stead of the URI itself; I've seen
implementations of that technique before.
Regards,
Tom
non-spam mail, unless the editor was a real noob. I have no recent
experience with MailChimp and friends, but I hope they're educating
users to use the GOOD version.
So a clear spam indicator for me.
Regards,
Tom
out via syslog/regex.. now if that is more
> efficient I/O-wise
>
I send all my logs to logstash + elasticsearch. Works like a charm,
but when there's nothing (message-id, sender recipient(s)) to search
on you're still screwed...
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
just don't mention anything
useful about spam email. Could you check the bayes stats so we actually
know if there is a problem?
Please show us output of "sa-learn --dump magic", probably ran as the
user amavisd user.
Regards,
Tom
On 10-06-15 17:25, Ben wrote:
> I have a curious conundrum.
>
> A piece of spam received shows the following in the header when
> processed via amavis and spamd :
> DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
> HTML_MESSAGE,
> RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,
> RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,
> RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,
> RDNS_DYNAMIC,
> SHORTENED
assume that "T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror)"
says enough. The rules in the archive post you provided only checks
for valid results, and has no safety net for temporary errors...
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVX7BLAAoJEJPfM
On 30/04/15 15:09, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 30.04.2015 um 04:10 schrieb Tom Robinson:
>> Is it correct that currently, because I'm forwarding, the DNSBL query is
>> denied because the DNSBL server thinks I'm the ISP making a query? Sorry,
>> I'm no
On 30/04/15 12:15, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 4/29/2015 10:10 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
>> I have the mail server and a separate name server set up in a DMZ. The name
>> server already runs as a
>> caching nameserver but does forwarding to our ISP.
> Hi Tom,
>
> Your
Tom Robinson
IT Manager/System Administrator
MoTeC Pty Ltd
121 Merrindale Drive
Croydon South
3136 Victoria
Australia
T: +61 3 9761 5050
F: +61 3 9761 5051
E: tom.robin...@motec.com.au
On 30/04/15 10:10, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Tom Robinson skrev den 2015-04-30 01:38:
>
&g
On 30/04/15 09:56, Marieke Janssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Besides your awl problem, you have other problems.
>
> 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
> blocked.
> See
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/D
Hi,
Below is the source from an email that is clearly spam but the AWL is -1.3
defeating the spam classification. How can I best adjust the AWL to get this
classified as SPAM.
Kind regards,
Tom
--
Tom Robinson
IT Manager/System Administrator
MoTeC Pty Ltd
121 Merrindale Drive
Croydon
Hi List
Sorry to post here with this.
Does anyone know if its possible to use Spamassassin for SMS filtering?
The "powers that be" are looking for a spam solution for the SMSC and
asked if SA is an option.
I have advised NO but thought I would ask the list for idea's
Many thanks
T
ward this to YOUR
tech-support first, time: Mar 26 23:06:06, client: 89.105.204.244,
server: mail-gw.thelounge.net, contact:
+4315953999
quit
221 2.0.0 Bye
Connection closed by foreign host.
- 8<-
Ok, so the machine accepts both addresses, but rejects at end-of-data.
Harald, if one of
y bother having given me correct
> information. Like all bothers, this is a risky assumption.
>
Change the milter decision to HOLD the message in stead of rejecting,
and inspect it after arrival.
Tom
ction, because you only need
to decide whether mail is ham or spam, and the bayes engine does most
of the other hard work for you.
If you're not going to put in some effort to either train a bayesian
filter for your users, of enable them to train it themselves (this has
some ris
ered by
(black|white)list_from. For whitelists I have USER_IN_WHITELIST in my
logs. No blacklist entries here, so grep your own logs or headers.
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU4Q/oAAoJEJPfMZ19VO/1duYP/0dvfCGym4EKenWGNnD+7ry9
5M0OEp/b21xKZKc7bDMhP0mKWCEy8XM2jWP8IdD
umentation could use an update.
>
> and h ebiggest issue is that the testmail from gmail hitted
> "MISSING_HEADERS" and "MISSING_SUBJECT" while both where present
> and so it looks the whole rule enigne is going crazy because one
> unescaped @
>
If you add custom r
isplay/ALD/Apache+SpamAssassin
After skimming that, it seems to me that your hosting provider (QIQ)
needs to configure cPanel for you in order to have mail labeled as
spam delivered (to your spam folder or otherwise). Also, in the
default settings, mail labeled as spam by spamassassin is already
dr
We (MailRoute) would be happy to pitch in. We can host mirrors in a couple of
datacenters (Los Angeles and Chicago). And we'll help out wherever else we can.
Tom
On 12/11/14 09:45, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 11.11.2014 um 23:41 schrieb Tom Robinson:
>> Hopefully someone can answer this simply with a link to the right
>> documentation.
>>
>> I want to adjust the score on a test but I have no idea what the four
>> nu
ation anywhere.
Please help.
Regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
P|GPG)(?:-Key)?-Fingerprint
> |D(?:KIM|omainKey)-Signature
> )}ix;
>
> funny...
>
Doing this in code has some drawbacks, just like the tld listing: it's
not visible to most people (like this thread nicely illustrates), and
you actually want to have it configurable. This one actually is
configurable, so now there are 2 tuneables for this problem: the code
(mostly static, hidden from view and unreachable for 99% of the users),
and the config file.
I propose to simplify, and move the code-wise exclusion to a config file
too: one tuneable (and one location to look at) is better than two.
Besides, the config file is far easier to read for the not so
regex-capable admin :)
Regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
urce, you may
>> want it to be tokenized... or not?
>> or if it only sends ham
>
> but are those IP's not mostly dynamic ones from botnets and so you end
> in a lot of tokens over the time?
>
Or it is a good machine that is rooted, and then cleaned up and resto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02-10-14 12:38, Axb wrote:
> On 10/02/2014 11:13 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using dspam besides spamassassin, and am interested in
>> comparing the bayesian data between the two. Dspam reports
>>
possible to show these in the
sa-learn output?
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
any list provider that accepts money to get
delisted.
If you decide that you don't like a list because it doesn't accept user
submissions, that's your opinion of course. But not very strong one,
IMHO: Spamhaus also doesn't accept user submissions, and they run lists
that are used by virtually everyone.
Regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
and also my 12 person company uses this as a filter.
>
We saw more big spam messages in the last half year, and experimented
with increasing max message size (we use spamc). In the end we settled
with a 4M limit. Never seen any timeout (or other) issues with larger
files, but it didn't matter: there was no significant traffic above that
limit.
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 - 100 of 381 matches
Mail list logo
