-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 04-01-15 11:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.01.2015 um 09:44 schrieb Henrik K:
>> On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 10:43:49PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe someone else will come up with a better documentation
>>> pointer for variables expanded inside Perl strings.
>>
>> Umm.. (sorry) for once Reindl is somewhat correct. We are writing
>> rules using _SpamAssassin_, not coding Perl. What low-level
>> regex/variables do in any language is meaningless in this context
>> as SpamAssassin might manipulate things in any number of ways.
>> Quoting requirements and other strange things should be
>> documented in SpamAssassin, but at a quick glance nothing is
>> mentioned about @, only # is referred as needing quoting. So
>> documentation could use an update.
>
> and h ebiggest issue is that the testmail from gmail hitted
> "MISSING_HEADERS" and "MISSING_SUBJECT" while both where present
> and so it looks the whole rule enigne is going crazy because one
> unescaped @
>
If you add custom rule that don't pass a lint test, you pretty much
screwed it up yourself. You can't blame spamassassin for that.
Regards,
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=SpVP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
