On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 12:28:45PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 08:25:58PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 31.03.19 um 20:23 schrieb The Doctor:
> > > Hello .
> > >
> > > How can I diagnose an overwhelm or cra
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 08:25:58PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 31.03.19 um 20:23 schrieb The Doctor:
> > Hello .
> >
> > How can I diagnose an overwhelm or crashing spams?
> >
> > In my mail logs, I see
> >
> > 2019-03-31 10:0
Hello .
How can I diagnose an overwhelm or crashing spams?
In my mail logs, I see
2019-03-31 10:05:32.099 [7917] 1hAcxf-00023h-Er spam acl condition: cannot
parse spamd [204.209.81.1]:783 output
2019-03-31 10:05:32.099 [7917] 1hAcxf-00023h-Er H=mail-yw1-f68.google.com
[209.85.161.68]:33747 I=
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 04:08:36PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 30 Nov 2018, at 15:17, The Doctor wrote:
>
> > Just ran sa-update using gnupg2
> >
> > and got
> >
> > channel: SHA512 verification failed, channel failed
> >
> > Why did that ha
Just ran sa-update using gnupg2
and got
channel: SHA512 verification failed, channel failed
Why did that happen?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.emp
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 09:16:20AM +1200, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Testing, testing, is this on?
> Sorry for the noise, checking if the users@ list is working since it has no
> messages for a while.
>
> Bcc'd to the moderators.
We are around.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:24:21PM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:43:04 -0600
> The Doctor wrote:
>
> > Suddenly overnight, spamassassin died on one of my FreeBSD servers
> > and attempts to get it back up are failing.
>
> > root@gallifrey:~ # ps axww
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 03:12:14PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> When you send an e-mail to yahoo's published abuse contact, you get back an
> e-mail saying to report the issue at http://abuse.yahoo.com/. Now, I really
> and truly hate people who think that you should do their job for them, and
> tha
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 06:08:54PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 5:52 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:46:55PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>>> On 10/13/2013 5:43 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> config: no rules were found! Do you need
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:46:55PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 5:43 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
> Looks like you need to run make install and sa-update -D should then
> install the ruleset you
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 01:28:56PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> I tried to replace 3.3.2 with 3.4.0rc3 and got
>> the start up message as expected.
>>
>> Tried to plug in a new ruleset and still no go.
>>
>
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 01:28:56PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> I tried to replace 3.3.2 with 3.4.0rc3 and got
>> the start up message as expected.
>>
>> Tried to plug in a new ruleset and still no go.
>>
>
I tried to replace 3.3.2 with 3.4.0rc3 and got
the start up message as expected.
Tried to plug in a new ruleset and still no go.
Any ideas?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:41:38AM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
> On Saturday 22 June 2013 07:06:43 The Doctor wrote:
>
> > Tweaking needed
>
> > Test Summary Report
> > t/bayesdbm_flock.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 48 Failed: 1)
> > Failed
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 02:45:12AM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
> This is not a formal announcement, but an invitation to a broader
> users community to try the release candidate of the coming release
> of Apache SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 .
>
> Preliminary release notes and a link to the package w
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:27:27PM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:20:22 -0800
> Marc Perkel wrote:
>
> > We need a rule to catch this. It looks like more data than it is but
> > it's really little more than a single link. Like to see a rule that
> > identifies it.
>
> Ou
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 12:57:39PM +0100, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently seeing an increasing number of subjects like the ones
> below that are not being detected by SA. Looking through the existing
> rules (i'm still running v3.3.1) I'm seeing both the GAPPY_SUBJECT and
> the SERGIO_
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 02:16:16AM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
> On Friday December 25 2009 23:36:32 The Doctor wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 03:19:28PM -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
> > > Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rc1 is now available for testing.
> > > D
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 07:25:12PM -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
> On 12/25/2009 05:36 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> t/basic_lint.t /usr/bin/perl: can't resolve symbol
>> '_Unwind_GetIP'
>> /usr/bin/perl: can't resolve symbol '_Unwind_G
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 03:19:28PM -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
> Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rc1 is now available for testing.
>
> Downloads are available from
> http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/
>
> md5sum of archive files:
>
> 41a68daf1bae2ded652a74c77b1fb498 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:55:00PM +0530, Rajkumar S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Occasionally I receive mail from compromised web mails asking user
> name and password from my users. The source IPs are usually clean (as
> they are legitimate mail servers) and do not catch any ip based rules.
> Usually one or
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:30:59AM -0700, snowweb wrote:
>
> I've just heard about sa-update and tried to run it. I was thinking of
> setting up a cron to do it daily, however, I got the following error message
> when I ran it manually:
>
> [r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update && service spamassassi
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 08:45:46AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:11:25PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >
> >> The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >>> All right why is AWL going to score 30+ when
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:11:25PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> > All right why is AWL going to score 30+ when it was told to go to -1000
> >
> > as in
> >
> > score AWL -1000
>
> You can't assign static scores to the AWL, this
All right why is AWL going to score 30+ when it was told to go to -1000
as in
score AWL -1000
??
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Never Satan President Republic!
Point to http://tv.cityonahill
I wish to make a system-wide change for BAYES_95 and BAYES_99 to
score 1000.0 . 999.999% of those e-mail scoringthat high
are worthy of GTUBE status.
How can make that change systemwide?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and c
Does anyone know how to stop this menace?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Merry Christmas 2008 NOT 2o8 and Happy New Year 2009 NOT 2o9
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 04:32:05PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 08.04.08 07:43, The Doctor wrote:
> > http://www.nk.ca/blog/ .
> >
> > In that blog, there is a section for Spam and Phish for your reasearch.
>
> whose research?
>
Anyone doing anti-
http://www.nk.ca/blog/ .
In that blog, there is a section for Spam and Phish for your reasearch.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
--
This m
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 09:26:39PM -0400, Joseph Brennan wrote:
>
>> thats a dynamic ip from telecomitalia. i'm getting lots of spam from
>> there but the ips are in no dynamic list. is there a more complete list
>> of dynamic hosts?
>
> We are currently doing this:
>
>
> # Telecomitalia. ISP wi
Hmm!! Slight problem!
I indicated a whtielist_from in the universal configuration file
and still there is {spam?} label.
What should I be fixing?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! On Mar
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:50:30PM -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
> At 03:35 PM 7/12/2007, The Doctor wrote:
> >Quick question, how do you tell spamassassin to
> >not anayse mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
>
> In a (few) words, you don't.
> Anything fed to spamassassin
Quick question, how do you tell spamassassin to
not anayse mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
PAtriots! MAke your declaration of loyalty!
--
This message has be
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:51:55AM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:30:10AM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote:
> >
> >>The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >>>Cans rules_du_jour work?
> >>>
> >>&
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:30:10AM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> >Cans rules_du_jour work?
> >
> >
> >Still getting a no update state.
> >
>
> SARE is back up (knock on wood). Delete your .cf files and re-run RDJ...
>
> --
Cans rules_du_jour work?
Still getting a no update state.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
PAtriots! MAke your declaration of loyalty!
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dan
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:21:38AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> > I know there are 3 new packages out for MailScanner, spamd and clamd
> > however I cannot determine with is adding to the /etc/mail/access file
> > 550 We do not accept junk mail .
> >
I know there are 3 new packages out for MailScanner, spamd and clamd
however I cannot determine with is adding to the /etc/mail/access file
550 We do not accept junk mail .
I need to turn of this feature as it block transmission from secondary to
+primary.
Also I am running Botnet 0.7 .
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 03:04:44PM -0700, John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, The Doctor wrote:
>
> > Any recipe recommendations?
>
> :0
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes.*\
> /dev/null
>
> Vary the rulename-of-death to suit.
>
> You could also set th
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 01:12:19PM -0700, R Lists06 wrote:
> >
> > Any recipe recommendations?
> > --
>
> Doc,
>
> Score the rule high and reject the email before accepted.
It is scored high (>99) and not it is a matter of rejecting using sendmail.
>
> We do it in some of our installations us
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:59:52PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> > Is there any way to using a ruleset to delete incoming mail
> > found on that ruleset?
> >
> >
> Depends, what are you using to delete your mail?
>
> Fundamentally, spama
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 08:35:41AM -0700, J. wrote:
>
> --- The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to using a ruleset to delete incoming mail
> > found on that ruleset?
>
> This seems to get asked an answered pretty regularly on this li
Is there any way to using a ruleset to delete incoming mail
found on that ruleset?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Beware Linux the Microsoft of Unixes!!
--
This message has been scanned
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 06:06:53PM -0800, John Rudd wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> >On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:26:10PM -0800, John Rudd wrote:
> >>New version of RelayChecker.
> >>
> >>http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar
> >>
>
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:26:10PM -0800, John Rudd wrote:
>
> New version of RelayChecker.
>
> http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar
>
> Changes:
>
> - It's now in a single tar file. Put the tar file into your plugin
> directory, expand it, and all should be good. The
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 06:06:15PM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> Robert Nicholson wrote:
> >When will the Shortcircuit feature be made available in a release?
>
> The Shortcircuit plugin should be available in 3.2.0. Recent messages
> have suggested that this might be released before January.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:48:16AM -0800, John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, sa-russian wrote:
>
> > Hi to all!
> >
> > I made a simple script that scans sendmail log files, finds IP
> > from which several spam messages were received, and blocks them in
> > sendmail access file.
>
> I
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:49:54AM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> >
> > I may have a server side solution using spamikaze but first
> > what is the SMTP server software taht you are using?
> >
> We're using Qmail with assorted patches - like th
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:23:19AM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> We are getting HAMMERED with a dictionary attack that is on a scale we
> have never experienced before.
>
> We have recipient verification on our edge servers, so basically it's
> all just bouncing off us, but it has been impacting us a
I have a mailbox that accepts spam if the
address is bogus. How do I train sa-learn to user the spam mail box
as --spam and universally block such mail?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Bew
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 01:09:25PM -0700, Robert Menschel wrote:
> Hello The,
>
> Sunday, October 23, 2005, 5:54:05 AM, you wrote:
>
> TD> I am using rules du Jour and now I am getting
>
> TD> ...
> The basic local.cf errors have already been answered.
> TD> [2136] warn: config: warning: score s
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:57:30AM -0400, JamesDR wrote:
> defang_mime - just remove it
> report_header - use add_header
> use_terse_report - again, use add_header
> detailed_phrase_score - not sure
> spam_level_stars - use add_header
> pyzor_add_header - not sure
>
> --
> Thanks,
> JamesDR
Got
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 07:28:50AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:05:31AM -0400, RoNNY wrote:
> > On 10/23/05, The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > [2136] warn: lint: 43 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled
> >
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:05:31AM -0400, RoNNY wrote:
> On 10/23/05, The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [2136] warn: lint: 43 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled for
> > more information
>
> The last line of your log gives a pretty good i
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:20:16PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
Justin from the next release of 3.1X, can you document some compile flags?
Also, is anyone using a perl 5.8.8per yet?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God Queen and country! B
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 06:14:43PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> *** THIS IS A RELEASE CANDIDATE ONLY, NOT THE FINAL 3.1.0 RELEASE ***
>
> SpamAssassin 3.1.0-rc1 is released! SpamAssassin 3.1.0 is a major update.
> SpamAssassin is a mail filter
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 06:00:58PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:45:36PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The whitelist in question:
> > >
> > > /.spamassassin/user_prefs:
> > &
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:45:36PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >
> > The whitelist in question:
> >
> > /.spamassassin/user_prefs:
> >
> >
>
>
>
> >
> > And the spamassassin is called as follows:
&
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:25:42PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Chris Santerre wrote:
> >>score gtube 4.0
>
> >
> >
> > *snip*
> >
> > Holy carp!!! Why did you rescore just about every rule higher?
>
> An even better question.. why did he try to rescore GTUBE down to 4.0?
>
> Alt
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:40:40PM -0400, JamesDR wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:48:22PM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
> >
> >>The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>All right, the short and simple
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:13:41PM -0500, Andy Jezierski wrote:
> The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/27/2005 02:34:42 PM:
>
> > - Forwarded message from Angry and Concerned Customer -
> >
> > X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/0.25.321 (localhost.nl2k.ab.c
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:02:32PM -0400, Ron Johnson wrote:
> The Doctor writes:
> >
> > - Forwarded message from Angry and Concerned Customer -
> >
> >
> >
> > All right, the short and simple is that Spam-Assassin may not be doing
> > t
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:00:15PM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> >excellent -- I see it's being discussed on p5p now. thanks for
> >doing that.
> >
> >(fwiw, that one-liner doesn't crash on Ubuntu Hoary's perl 5.8.3.)
> >
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:48:22PM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> >All right, the short and simple is that Spam-Assassin may not be doing
> >the correct job. This user has a whitelist in place and
> >some e-mail are getting th
- Forwarded message from Angry and Concerned Customer -
X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/0.25.321 (localhost.nl2k.ab.ca [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 27
Jul 2005 13:11:47 -0600
Hi Dave - we are still getting people labeled as sending us spam that should
be on that white list (this includes emails fr
1) I do have user-configs that have whitelists but it seems to have next to no
effect. What could be wrong?
2) 3.1.0 and BSDes. The ruid problem, will that be adddressed in 3.1.0 pre4?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God Queen and
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:32:43PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> The Doctor writes:
> > FOund the problem. From the logs:
> >
> > Thu Jul 7 21:55:45 2005 [4390] dbg: spamd: initial attempt to change
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:11:40AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 04:29 AM 7/8/2005, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> >Well that's the problem then. You are starting spamd, which MailScanner
> >does not use..
> >
> >Other people on the MailScanner list report no issues with SA 3.1/
>
> And before anyone
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 09:01:25PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:23:45PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > At 08:41 PM 7/5/2005, The Doctor wrote:
> > >Spam Assassin 3.0.4 works with milter-spamc 0.25, smf-spamd and MailScanner
> > >Current.
> >
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:23:45PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 08:41 PM 7/5/2005, The Doctor wrote:
> >Spam Assassin 3.0.4 works with milter-spamc 0.25, smf-spamd and MailScanner
> >Current.
> >
> >Spam Assassin 3.1.0 only works MailScanner Current less than 10%
Spam Assassin 3.0.4 works with milter-spamc 0.25, smf-spamd and MailScanner
Current.
Spam Assassin 3.1.0 only works MailScanner Current less than 10% .
How can I help to determine where the source of the problem is?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:38:10PM +0800, liyas_m m wrote:
> Hi,
> I have installed the lastest version of SpamAssassin.
> But it doest seem to stop the spam email that coming in to my
> server..please help
> How do i check whether my configuration is correct.
>
Question, are you using a 3rd party
Failure!! It does not work with milter-spamc older version.
THAT needs to be fixed. I refer to the last milter-spamc which was free.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
nk.ca started 1 June
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:56:29PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> hi all --
>
> it's time to broaden the pool of 3.1.0 testing -- so here's a prerelease.
> It's functionally quite close to what 3.1.0 will be, although we haven't
> yet done the rescoring mass-checks and Perceptron run, and there
> ma
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 07:20:36AM +0300, Nabil Sabry wrote:
> Dear all,
> I have been recently added to this tool.
> BOTH the IT team and the ISP claim they know nothing about it!
> Is there any means to know who added me?
> regards
> nabil
>
Some like a harbester wanting to cause trouble.
--
How can one use user_prefs to tell spamassassin to reject spam
tagged at level N at just send it back to them?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
insert you thought here.
IS there a good package that one can plug into Spam Assassin for C-r?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
BC, Vote Liberal!!
77 matches
Mail list logo
