On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:11:25PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > The Doctor wrote: > > All right why is AWL going to score 30+ when it was told to go to -1000 > > > > as in > > > > score AWL -1000 > > You can't assign static scores to the AWL, this goes against the > definition of what it is. It's score is, by design, dynamic on a > per-message basis. Otherwise it would essentially be adding -1000 to > more-or-less all of your mail, spam or not. The AWL doesn't decide what > to whitelist, it merely decides what score to give based on past > history. If anyone sends you two emails, the second one will always > match the AWL. However, that score might be negative or positive. > > Read up on what the AWL really is, and how it really works: > > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist > >
All right then this is really odd!!! The person has always sent me mail from the intranet no problem. I just updated the perl to 5.10.0 threading and then I am like how did AWL change? > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > -- Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! Never Satan President Republic! Point to http://tv.cityonahillproductions.com/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
