Greetings,
Is anyone else getting these UCE messages?
MGD
Original Message
Subject:spam assassin / Razor
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:04:19 -0700
From: Matt Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Martin,
I’m reaching out to all existing Razor users,
Kelson wrote:
How did you whitelist borland.com? Did you use...
whitelist_from
whitelist_from_rcvd
whitelist_from_dkim
whitelist_from_spf
...etc?
If you just used whitelist_from, it doesn't do any verification. It's a
last-ditch option for cases where more reliable methods aren't possible.
Greetings,
I have a piece of SPAM with an obviously spoofed (obvious to me,
that is) from address ... but didn't get flagged as SPAM.
The message claims to originate from borland.com
borland.com has IP 63.175.76.152
The message actually originates from napfehfu 86.60.37.183
borland.com is lis
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
I want to interact with this list via nntp (gmane),
but since this list is member-only, I must subscribe to
post. I didn't find the way to set the option not to
> receive messages from the list.
A hint?
Thanks,
Ugo
I'm curious ... How will you read the repl
2; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host 192.168.101.1[192.168.101.1] said: 530
Authentication required (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
Subject: Re: Blogger attacks SURBL
From:"Martin G. Diehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Tue, 31 M
[RESEND - was bounced by SURBL Discuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
Jeff Chan wrote:
> Pardon the dramatic title, but hopefully it got your attention.
>
> This guy's domain got listed by Outblaze, we removed it, and as
> thanks this guy paints us as irresponsible. Please help us
> straighten him out, g
Jeff Chan wrote:
Pardon the dramatic title, but hopefully it got your attention.
This guy's domain got listed by Outblaze, we removed it, and as
thanks this guy paints us as irresponsible. Please help us
straighten him out, gently:
http://blog.holtz.com/index.php/weblog/comments/blacklisting_
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
Hey, do you know any commands to remove things from other peoples' ASS?
Maybe something like --remove-stick-from ? My boss really needs this!
No, usually the only thing you can try on someone else is
--remove-head-from-ass. However, this will fail on som
version=3.0.2
My guess is that many of the usual SPAMassassin tests didn't run at all
because of the missing headers ... as though it became whitelisted.
--
Martin G. Diehl
old folks to
defeat youth and enthusiasm. {^_-}
{^_^}
--
Martin G. Diehl
Visit my online gallery: Renderosity, a 3D Artist's Community
http://www.renderosity.com/gallery.ez?ByArtist=Yes&Artist=MGD
So much wisdom and knowledge -- so little time and bandwidth.
--MGD
Reality: That which remains af
Evan Platt wrote:
At 11:03 AM 5/11/2005, you wrote:
Or maybe they're just early for next year?
A few years ago, right before X-Mas (ok, 2 weeks), the company I then
worked at got a fax spam telling us about their great grandfather
clocks. "Order NOW for Christmas Delivery!"
3 weeks later (AFTER
Greetings,
A small non-scientific sample of some SPAM subjects ...
(and an actual serious question later in this message).
[incomprehensible SPAM]
Subject: ¡Ú±¹³»1À§ Á÷ÀåÀδ롤Ãâ ½ºÆä¼È·Ð 5000¸¸¿ø¿ø±îÁö ³â5~12% 100%½ÂÀÎ!
Subject: ¡á¡áÇö±ÝÀÌ¿À°¡´Â Ä«Áö³ë °í½ºÅé.Æ÷Ä¿¡á¡á[À̹ÌÁöº¸±âŬ¸¯] cvkuhfq
Subje
Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 5/11/2005 2:51 PM, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
On 5/11/2005 6:58 AM, Martin G. Diehl wrote:
[snip]
Trying to figure out who/where this is happening is the exercise
Those words should be carved into stone on the doorposts of every
Tech Support cube farm and every Computer Science
Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 5/11/2005 6:58 AM, Martin G. Diehl wrote:
I saw a SPAM message with the SPAMassassin message headers
(X-spam headers) grossly out of sequence. The message
was recognized as SPAM ... but because the X-spam headers
were written in the wrong part of the message, it was able
I
version dependent;
standard disclaimers may apply, YMMV, &c.
Send the whole thing (I prefer the images to a word document, zip) to me.
Loren
--
Martin G. Diehl
2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
* 1.6 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
* 0.4 FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS From: contains an underline and
numbers/letters
~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-[end_SPAM_headers]-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
--
Martin G. Diehl
what kind of configuration error could cause the X-spam
headers to be misplaced?
(4) are the message headers misscoded to exploit a bug in
SPAMassassin?
--
Martin G. Diehl
~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-[beg_SPAM_headers]-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
From - Mon Apr 25 12:36:07 2005
X-UIDL: 111
Chris Hale wrote:
>
I think I've exhausted my search on Google and the archives for this list.
I have an ISP that does SpamAssassin for my email, which then I download via
POP3.
I use Outlook 2000, which I know can filter the emails too other folders,
etc, based on the SA headers.
What I would like
Sorry if you see a double post ... it was my bad to forget to
remove the ** spam ** flags in the subject.
Original Message
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 flags messages from
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:58:00 -0400
From: Martin G. Diehl <[EM
Sorry if you see a double post ... it was my bad to forget to
remove the ** spam ** flags in the subject.
Original Message
Subject: Re: *SPAM* SpamAssassin 3.0.2 flags messages from
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:58:00 -0400
From: Martin G. Diehl
Thomas Cameron wrote:
so I whitelist on: List-Id:
Do you mind posting the exact syntax in your local.cf to do this?
All that I was able to find out is that it locally coding and is part
of the user login.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Martin G. Diehl
Martin G. Diehl wrote:
Thanks to everyone who responded ... you helped me think it through.
Greetings,
I am seeing some SpamAssassin eMail messages flagged as SPAM.
That's probably not unusual, given the nature of our discussions and
especially because we quote actual SPAM examples withi
Stewart, John wrote:
[snip]
The opt-out was to email back to the address and ask to be removed.
The problem was that no one was regularly checking this address.
I spoke to the co-owner again about this and it sounds like they
are putting in a procedure to check this account regularly.
johnS
No
these special characters at the end of url, URI
M>checks tries to make lookup as
M>
M>debug: querying for coolestrxever.com:.sc.surbl.org
M>
M>End result, passed the promising URI checks.
M>
M>I am seeing the first of its kind of spam. If any version of
M>Spamassassin fixes this in its URI retrieval program please
M>let me know
M>
M>--
There is a fix for these in the bugzilla, came in correctly caught by SURBL
here, using 3.0.2.
There is two fixes I have applied and seems to catch the URL split over
lines too, not sure if these are included in 3.0.3, I suspect this one is.
Martin
--
Martin G. Diehl
Stewart, John wrote:
Well, I just got a call from the person at the store who is
responsible for setting up the technical side of things.
It was not a good conversation.
I recall a telephone solicitation ...
I was getting calls from a cemetery about their great real estate
deals ... on the same
Chris Santerre wrote:
*snip*
Cliffs: Hairdresser is spamming anyone with an account.
Do I:
- Show up and try to convince her what a horrible thing she is doing?
Yup.
Yes ... if you show up in person ... as a client ...
she will react differently than to eMail or telephone.
- Simply ban their dom
Chris Lear wrote:
* Stewart, John wrote (05/06/05 15:55):
[... excellent story chopped ...]
Do I:
- Never go there again, as I said would be the case in my previous email?
- Show up and try to convince her what a horrible thing she is doing?
- Just screw with their (horribly insecure) online site,
Loren Wilton wrote:
Are yoiu cc-ing yourself on the reports? I've had stupid mail systems kick
back mail I sent to people claiming 'relaying denied' if I had a cc that
wasn't at the target destinaiton.
Loren
When I want to have a 'record' copy of that sort of correspondence ...
I use bcc:
00
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
My questions ...
(1) has this come up before?
(2) is it possible for this to be a configuration error?
(3) is this a bug that should be passed along to the developers?
--
Martin G. Diehl
~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-[beg_SPAM_headers]-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
29 matches
Mail list logo
