Zitat von Benny Pedersen :
i came after using it this way for long time now that it could be
more optimized with bayes user id vars, currently it creates new ids
each time there is a new user, but it does not reuse old ids that is
not used anymore after sa-learn --username f...@example.org,
Zitat von Davide Marchi :
It is true what you say and I am aware of it and even this could be
a solution, but I would like to consider it only as an extreme
solution
The simple question is: what do you gain/expect to gain by a backup MX
host, why do you need it?
If you setup one and got
Am 2017-01-10 08:48, schrieb Emin Akbulut:
Hi all,
Recently we receive spam messages and SA cannot block them.
I've also checked the raw message at http://spamcheck.postmarkapp.com/
and score was very low either.
I've trained the SA and it worked for a while but now it's useless.
How can I p
Am 2017-01-09 22:30, schrieb L A Walsh:
I have:
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -5.0
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 10.0
In order for autolearn to work you need at least 200 trained messages in
the ham and spam category. If the filter doesn't know enough mails yet
it will state it in the
Am 05.01.2017 um 17:38 schrieb Nicola Piazzi:
Each minute it learn messages of the last minute so it read and learn one time
only for each message
Messages are that it sends from internal, so il learn that words are not spam
Internal messages are not spam
You'll never know if internal messag
Am 2017-01-04 10:58, schrieb Nicola Piazzi:
I found useful to put in cron a little script like this
Each minute cron launch this script that takes messages of last minute
reading from maillog database
What's the purpose of this script, what's the reasoning behind running
this thingie every
Zitat von Tom Hendrikx :
Did you file a ticket with them? I'm curious as to what they are saying
about it.
Actually I got this info by their phone support, and the info was back
then it's not supported and unlikely will be supported very soon.
Just like DNSSEC, they also don't offer it and
Zitat von RW :
Are there really resolvers that can't handle it? My understanding is
that the relevant limit here is on the length of a string, 255 bytes.
Yahoo have broken their DKIM TXT record into multiple short strings to
keep within the limit.
There are still enough resolvers around which
Zitat von Groach :
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.net;
s=s2048; t=1482596721;
DKIM entries do live in DNS space. Not every DNS server software (and
resolver) around is able to handle 2048 bit sized keys, which are 512
bytes.
If you want to be on the safe s
andle archive files.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
MARC STÜRMER
Ahornstraße 5 | 97506 Grafenrheinfeld
Tel: 09723 9313969 | Mobil: 0174 3393862 | Fax: 09723 9314810 |
m...@marc-stuermer.de
Am 2016-11-23 04:11, schrieb Michael Heuberger:
I'm running Spamassassin v3.4.1 here on an headless Ubuntu 16.10
server together with Monit (and Postfix of course). Each time server
restarts, Monit says first that the spamd process is not running (no
PID) but in three minutes later it says the o
Am 04.11.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Holger Schramm:
If you don't like them, don't use their services. It is really that easy.
That's the one part, the other part is what Dianne wrote about. If this
happens to you better be sure to have a 2nd MX ready with a totally
different IP address.
Every
Am 2016-11-03 15:34, schrieb MHielder:
A that old lie, that one has to pay to be removed again? Really?
Did it prevent people using UCEPROTECT within the last 15 years?
No, it didn't. The guys telling lies in the public just made fools out
of themselves.
The fact that every person interested
Zitat von Marco :
Sorry, I know this is not uceprotect list, but I don't know how to
contact uceprotect, their contact form is unavailable.
It seems the problem starts on 30 october. Did you have noticed too
something about?
UCE Protect has a very questionable reputation, foremost reason
14 matches
Mail list logo
