domain.
Regards,
Lee
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:27 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: DKIM Score
On 16.08.16 08:18, Chris Lee wrote:
>Besides, it is possible to just whitelist or blacklist s
Hi Merijn,
Still digest your solution, look like it rather complex to me.
Besides, it is possible to just whitelist or blacklist some email address for
DKIM checking?
Regards,
Chris Lee
-Original Message-
From: Merijn van den Kroonenberg [mailto:mer...@web2all.nl]
Sent: Tuesday
have lots of domain to handle.
Regards,
Lee
-Original Message-
From: Merijn van den Kroonenberg [mailto:mer...@web2all.nl]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 7:19 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: DKIM Score
> Hi,
>
> How to setup to give high score for specific domain ca
,
Lee
This message and its attachment (if any) are strictly confidential and sent to
the designated recipient(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender by e-mail and delete this message and its attachment (if any)
from your computer system immediately . Century
On 5/7/2013 12:11 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>> What I did not get was why my attempts to clarify whatever offense
>> was taken were met by reject messages.
> Quite simply put, Benny Pedersen wants you to respect his
> signature, which read
some folks are preachy and sensitive... like those bottom posters who
seem to like telling top posters how wrong they are.
I wouldn't worry about it.
But it was interesting to hear the history of the word "plonk".. that
was cool.
-lee
On 5/7/2013 12:06 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wr
no idea, I read emails from both you and him and didn't see anything amiss.
Benny's signature does not parse as English so it's hard to say what it
means.
I wouldn't worry about it.
-lee
On 5/7/2013 8:56 AM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
> Whatever that means.
>
> I th
On 4/11/2012 8:23 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Lee Dilkie wrote:
>> On 4/10/2012 10:50 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, thanks for the info. It certainly explains things. Yeah, SpamAssassin
>> previously used to blaze through mail scans
wer over time and there's no way to stop it
> because older versions of Perl get deprecated. - Julian
I've found that bsdpan-Mail-SpamAssassin-CompiledRegexps makes a vast
improvement in rules regex scanning.
-lee
0
> Jenny Lee wrote:
>
> > Will give this a go. What I don't understand is that... Why is this
> > not catching this 'utf' which is on the subject?
>
> You need the :raw tag to see the raw, unencoded header. The meta-rule:
>
> header __RP_SUBJ_CJK Subj
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:42:05 -0700
> From: jhar...@impsec.org
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
>
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, David F. Skoll wrote:
>
> > PS: I haven't looked at SA's Bayes implementation. Can it handle
> > words in non-western ch
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:14:10 -0400
> From: d...@roaringpenguin.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
>
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:40:16 +
> Jenny Lee wrote:
>
> > Will give this a go. What I don't unders
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 05:47:03 -0700
> From: le...@jam-software.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
>
>
>
> Jenny Lee-2 wrote:
> >
> > I did turn it on in the .pre. It is also supposed to add a header,
> Subject: Re: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
> From: mar...@gregorie.org
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:09:19 +
>
> On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 09:48 +, Jenny Lee wrote:
> >
> > Dear SA Users,
> >
> > I am get
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:19:38 +
> From: rwmailli...@googlemail.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
>
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:14:36 +
> RW wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:4
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:25:21 -0400
> From: d...@roaringpenguin.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
>
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:48:37 +
> Jenny Lee wrote:
>
> > I am getting this chinese spam e
> Dear SA Users,
>
> I am getting this chinese spam every hour. I tried, ok_locales, ok_languages
> with texcat plugin... I tried matching the subject... but these people are
> always getting through.
>
> http://www.pastebin.ca/2127622
>
> What rules/modifications do I need to do to get rid o
Dear SA Users,
I am getting this chinese spam every hour. I tried, ok_locales, ok_languages
with texcat plugin... I tried matching the subject... but these people are
always getting through.
http://www.pastebin.ca/2127622
What rules/modifications do I need to do to get rid of this?
J
> From: list...@abbacomm.net
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: real world spamassassin experiences re: processing on servers
> emailing from .info domains
> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:15:13 -0700
>
>
> greetings SA users
>
> there sure seems
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:10:28 -0400
> From: dar...@chaosreigns.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why doesn't anything at all get these botnet spammers?
>
> On 10/15, Jenny Lee wrote:
> > fwoicka odrp jbguybf etvwmbwm
> > i aluaw
> One way you can get rid of about 1/4 of your botnet spam is to set your
> highest numbered MX record as follows:
>
> tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com
Why bother trying to defeat 1/4 of botnet SPAM? I was getting rid of *all* of
it with greylisting since 3-4 years. No need for bothering with MXe
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:26:21 +0100
> From: n...@unixmail.co.uk
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why doesn't anything at all get these botnet spammers?
>
> On 17/10/11 19:07, Jenny Lee wrote:
> >
> > Every 2nd of my emails to this
Every 2nd of my emails to this list from hotmail is returning as a
nondeliverable. Hotmail does not give any info as to what failed but I am
assuming it is the SPAM filters of the mailing list. Well done!
Also how ironic is it to write: users -at- spamassassin.apache.org on the
website!!! Wh
, John Hardin wrote:
> >> On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Jenny Lee wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Everyone,
> >>>
> >>> Is there any way to get these people?
> >>
> >>> Subject: T !r (a -n*n =l&e ` S !e .x|
> >>> Subject: Se^x M-
Hello Everyone,
Is there any way to get these people?
Instead of doing greylisting, I started doing SA+Greylisting 3 months ago.
Since then, this guy always gets through until I modify our custom ruleset to
block his URLs.
Currently I have:
uri OUR_CUSTOM_URI /\.(tumblr\.com|de\.tl|filea
Yves. (ie. the
first hop was ipv4, the second was ipv6).
-lee
On 7/2/2011 4:06 AM, Yves Goergen wrote:
> On 30.06.2011 13:06 CE(S)T, Matthew Newton wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:59:52PM +0200, Yves Goergen wrote:
>>>> Received: from sp***ck.di***ie.com ([2001:***::40])
it's IPv4.5
-lee
On 3/31/2011 1:47 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
> On 31/03/2011 1:29 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> 'from' dhl.com
>> (come on ups/dhl.. I know SPF is broken, but in this case it would
>> sure help is decide if the sending ip is authorized t
;
>> I don't have a full example of an email that triggers this, but I
>> have the body of one that will regularly trigger it here:
>> http://pastebin.com/iGQ2RJ6v
> Works here, compiled rules, freebsd 7.3, amd64, perl 5.10, re2c, 0.13.5
>
fails for me, loops, freebsd 7.3, intel, perl 5.12.3, SA 3.3.1, re2c 001305
what rule should we comment out until this is fixed?
-lee
mail for that domain. But is it allowed, in the rfcs, to be a
"send-only" domain (no MX record) even if that means DSN's cannot be
delivered? good question.
-lee
On 2/23/2011 12:51 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Henry | Security Division,
>
> Am 2011-02-23 13:50:19, hac
On 1/19/2011 10:02 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:56:47 -0500
> Lee Dilkie wrote:
>
>> The second was that I've found that the other spam-catching filtering
>> is doing a much better job than it was years ago and turning off
>> greylisting di
that I've found that the other spam-catching filtering is
doing a much better job than it was years ago and turning off
greylisting didn't adversely affect the amount of spam that got through.
-lee
On 1/18/2011 5:41 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> On 01/18/2011 12:31 PM, David F. Skoll
he zone file.
This looks like RDNS delegation to me, allowing a statically assigned
block of addresses from an ISP to control their own RDNS lookups.The
owner of the address block wouldn't be able to modify the upstream's
RDNS zone files so that's why the upstream has put in
:)
love your style.
-lee
On 9/26/2010 8:00 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> *Might* have been a dev question, but it actually is not. Not even close
> to it. ;)
>
> On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 17:29 -0400, Lee Dilkie wrote:
>> Use of "goto" to jump into a construct is
Use of "goto" to jump into a construct is deprecated at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.12.2/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Check.pm line 409
seeing this in a number of places after I upgraded perl to 5.12.
Should I submit a bug report or this already known?
--
-lee
the rule is flagging the fact that the servers are using
non-assigned address space.
On 6/17/2010 2:19 PM, gwilodailo wrote:
Hello all,
I've discovered that some mail between two of my clients (on separate hosts)
is getting flagged as spam, because of this rule (FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA). I
Apologies if I missed a
> response, but was there any difference noticable for the mails that
> process quicker?
>
> - Charles
Are you folks using sa-compile? I found a vast improvement in body scan
performance by switching to it.
-lee
The setup:
Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty system running postfix, amavis, clamav, and
spamassassin.
These systems(2) serve as relay and filtering gateways into a
proprietary custom mail system.
Problem 1)
SpamAssassin won't implement local config changes.
I have tried making changes to /etc/spamassas
ne choice for high-speed internet access (myself included).
Second. The fact that a mail server rejects, outright, based on
something so false-positivity as a db for "dynamic" ip's is
irresponsible on the part of the admin. Sure, add some spammy points and
do a scan but an outright rejection?
-lee
s.
your mileage may vary... I've had no problem since and the original
sa-update has been used since my one time hack.
-lee
Personal Técnico wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting this error when I run sa-update:
>
> config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
> "/tmp/.sp
Chris,
Do you use sa-compile? I found that made a tremendous difference for me.
-lee
Chris wrote:
> I've posted two files below, one is the time output for a spam and one
> for ham. Seems like over the past few weeks SA scan times have become
> slower and slower. For instance s
g and are in the 500K range in size. I'm not sure if
it'll matter too much to scan the odd email that's large I'll have
to monitor my stats.
-lee
secure dependency in open" (I'm
guessing that -T is the perl switch to enable "taint" checks???)
And I checked (copied the warn line to above the open), the file
"/var/log/FuzzyOcr.log" is owned and writable by the user (mailnull in my case
as I'm running on freebsd).
TIA,
-lee
([127.0.0.1] helo=freecycle.org)
by bulkmail2.freecycle.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
was this a forwarded email? from mscip02.mailsentry.net.au to
chestnut2.exetel.com.au? I don't think you can apply an SPF check after
it's been forwarded.
-lee
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Phill,
>
re back (number
of other changes too). Not sure why the gremlins were banished.
Interesting mystery.
-lee
Lee Dilkie wrote:
> Final update folks, sorry for the noise if it's bothersome...
>
> commented out the three offending lines in 72_active.cf and --lint
> passed and I'm
Final update folks, sorry for the noise if it's bothersome...
commented out the three offending lines in 72_active.cf and --lint
passed and I'm back up and running.
No idea what the issue is, those lines looked fine to me. I'm running
perl 5.8.9, could that be an issue?
-lee
de
Subject =~ /Approve/i^M
header __SUBJ_RE Subject =~ /^R[eE]:/^M
-lee
Lee Dilkie wrote:
> no joy.
>
> doesn't look like the ports version of SA comes with any stock rules
> (nothing obvious in the ports dir tree, the work/ directory had en empty
> 72_active.cf file).
ng lines in 72_active.cf?? Is there an archive I
can download? (I'm thinking of modifying sa-update to comment-out where
it removes the tmp files)
-lee
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 06:45 -0500, Lee Dilkie wrote:
>
>> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>
>
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 18:44 -0500, Lee Dilkie wrote:
>
>> For what ever reason, my sa-update to 3.30 has buggered itself. In my
>> efforts to debug it's now at the situation that SA has no rules to run
>> and I'm getting swamped.
the tree and sa-compiling did
not work. SA is still looking for 3.3 rules and as it finds none, is
letting everything through.
TIA
-lee
<http://www.fuelly.com/driver/dilkie/golf>
nevermind, it eventually created the directory and jeyring files... not
quite sure how that happened..
Lee Dilkie wrote:
> On getting pgp to work... Following HOWTO at
> http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt
>
> "wget http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-up
ed: General error
there is no directory 'sa-update-keys' under
'/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin'
should they have been installed with the SA package (I'm running on
FreeBSD).
$ sa-update -V
sa-update version svn897929
running on Perl version 5.8.9
-lee
26 04:15:07.447 [14130] dbg: zoom: using compiled ruleset in
>> /var/db/spamassassin/compiled/5.008/3.003000/Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm
>> for Mail::SpamAssassin::CompiledRegexps::body_0
>>
>
> Hmm. This is probably a flaw in sa-update, but probably doesn't affect
> your issue. For fun, try rm'ing /var/db/spamassassin/compiled/ and run
> sa-update again.
>
>
Tied that Daryl and still no good, same error
Thanks for lending a hand.
-lee
ords when you're
sending spam from a million infected machines.
-lee
Thanks very much for the various replies on this, both on and off list.
I'm very grateful and am considering things.
Lee
d from ISP POP3 accounts. I have no plans to
increase that load and all I am doing is handling personal non-business
email.
Feel free to email me off-list, should you want to.
Many thanks,
Lee
UK
y offering
what I'm looking for.
Kevin Parris wrote:
This part of your message has really confused me about what you are trying to
accomplish:
Lee 06/28/09 9:45 PM >>>
I need the ability for SA to connect to SSL connections as well as insecure
ones, so I don
Thanks for the below, Martin.
Maybe so far I missed it on the web, but that's the clearest description
I've come across and actually makes sense to me.
:)
Lee
Martin Gregorie wrote:
The main benefit for low volume (personal) mail is that using
spamc/spamd avoids the considerable
r for me, and put it back in its box. Then just use TB and
Popfile until the end of time.
Or indeed until a mystical time when a new XP/Vista desktop
SAproxy/client gets made.
:)
Lee
st tell me so, and I won't frustrate myself with attempting
this line of thought any further.
I appreciate one or two posters have already said / implied this.
Lee
UK
ave an option 'Trust junk mail headers set by
SpamAssassin', which I _assume_ is the equivalent of manually making a
filter to act on the header X-Spam-Status if present. I haven't tried it
... maybe I should! (I made my own filter looking for X-Spam-Status: Yes).
Lee
. The assumption here of course
is, to make it worthwhile, we trust the host has correctly installed and
fully configured SA for it to work optimumly (if that word exists).
Lee
René Berber wrote:
Lee wrote:
[snip]
I appreciate however those instructions may be aimed at a mindset and
applicati
to build the latest
SA and what can and cannot be achieved, explicitly with a section on
using a suitable pop3proxy script/program through to a desktop client,
so you're not left with SA and nowhere to go with it. :)
Lee
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
Lee
I'd advise you not to try this path much longer. The effort to get the
full functionality is not worth it. You will never get it all, unless
you're prepared to port a lot of the stuff to W32 (been there - done
(part) of it - never again)
Sugges
able on Windows.
Lee
UK
My Spam assassin is run from /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter via the perl
module.
Initialized using:
spam_assassin_init()->compile_now(1) if
defined(spam_assassin_init());
And checked with:
my($hits, $req, $names, $report) = spam_assassin_check();
When running sa-update, do I need
From: mouss [mailto:mo...@ml.netoyen.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:30 PM
> > At question is the statement
> > dbg: channel: current version is 752903, new version is 752903,
> > skipping channel
>$ host -t txt 3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org
3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org descriptive
I'm a new administrator at a site and have been tasked with updating
Spam Assassin, something I have never worked with before.
I am running /usr/perl5/5.8.4/bin/sa-update daily as a cronjob, but I'm
not sure if this is accomplishing anything.
I have read through FAQs and documentation, but haven't
: I will be on vacation from June 23, 2007 through July 8, 2007.
--
Lee Leahu RICIS, Inc.
Internet Technology Specialist 866-RICIS-77 Toll Free Voice (US)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 708-444-2690 Voice (International)
http://www.ricis
May 26, 2007 through June 3, 2007.
NOTE: I will be on vacation from June 23, 2007 through July 8, 2007.
--
Lee Leahu RICIS, Inc.
Internet Technology Specialist 866-RICIS-77 Toll Free Voice (US)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 708-444-2690 Voice (International
rcial message. I ran
one such file through giffix and then through gocr, and I didn't get
anything meaningful back - so I guess the underlying problem is with
gocr instead.
Comments?
--
Lee Manevitch
Bradenton, FL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist, you want the email, period, regardless of content. -- Lee Manevitch Bradenton, FL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lee
n:Lee;Jay
org:Philadelphia Biblical University;Information Technology Dept.
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Network / Systems Administrator
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 17:27 Bowie Bailey wrote:
So you are saying that I should not feed Bayes with the unsolicited
marketing garbage that I get because it looks like something that
could have been requested?
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Jason Haar wrote:
Has anyone done this, and if so, what sort of tools allow it?
A Linux mail relay in front of the Exchange server. :)
That wouldn't allow messages to be put in a subfolder instead of inbox,
just to do the h
The message you sent directly to me hit the following:
* 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
* 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* 1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
* above 50%
* [cf:
Bazooka Joe wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=3.0
tests=BAYES_60 autolearn=ham
version=3.0.4
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4
(2005-06-05) on agwebinc.com
I have required of 3
wrote:
| But.
|
| There are some spammers who run "subscribe to" mailing lists.
|
| I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example.
|
| I call this stuff "subscription spam" and would block most of it anyway.
|
| Cheers,
|
| Phil
Easier said than done when you hav
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, mouss wrote:
> Daryl C. W. O'Shea a écrit :
> > David Lee wrote:
> >
> >> If, conversely, it is not in breach, then SA has a problem: it shouldn't
> >> be marking it "INVALID_DATE". Incidentally, it is this aspect (rather
t you send".
Further, 2822 section 3.3 has:
date-time = [ day-of-week "," ] date FWS time [CFWS]
...
time= time-of-day FWS zone
...
zone= (( "+" / "-" ) 4DIGIT) / obs-zone
Taking FWS and CFWS into consideration, this _see
or definitely isn't, technically legal?
(If it does happen to be legal, and if this nevertheless triggers SA's
INVALID_DATE, then we have an SA bug.)
Would "GMT (Standard Time)" be legal? (I raise that just in case "mmail"
really need to keep that information
echnique too. I've not seen a SA
rule that triggers on this specifically. Any thoughts?
Jay
begin:vcard
fn:Jay Lee
n:Lee;Jay
org:Philadelphia Biblical University;Information Technology Department
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Network / Systems Administrator
version:2.1
end:vcard
Hi
I'm running SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a dedicated linux server. Spamd is
running as a daemon and allowing connections from 4 mail servers.
Every few hours, spamd will just stop responding, without any errors in
its logfiles. Whenever this happends I run a netstat -an on the server
and I see lots
tage
while being more tolerant of the occassional false negative. To each his
own I guess, but I agree with the first respondant that your missing out
by turning off negative scoring...
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
. It's really the only option when processing this
much mail. Switch and watch your load drop dramatically.
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
, many MTAs
are capable of blocking based on the declared helo or dns lookup of the
connecting server.
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
#x27;m not sure where you question is. To test this out, disable spamd...
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
well as more generic
scams. I did bump the scores for these rules up somewhat to help them
along...
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
aught
anymore and what does the SA report say? We need more details to help you.
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
Are they any rules to stop this type of spam? It is continually
growing and doesnt ever let up.
Thanks,
Jeff
Mark Williams wrote:
I have just installed spamassassin v3.0.4 in a test environment (which
is a mirror of the live environment) and have a number of questions,
which I can not see within the manuals/support documentation.
Firstly, this is my configuration:
Server: Linux (RH9.0), with spamassa
try communigate pro
www.stalker.com
On Jul 16, 2005, at 9:21 PM, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
OS X uses Postfix by default (at least it does on my Powerbook
running Tiger). While it's not "graphical" per-sea, it's not
difficult to set up. I'm sure someone out there has written a
GUI for
it being called
within your mail path?
We can't help you if you don't help us.
I think you meant "Help me, help you!"
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
if there is any chance that the
catches large No scores also?
It's just easier for most filtering languages to look at the stars,
that's why there there. The yes/no only gives you a black/white world,
the score number is easy for humans to read but hard for programming
languages.
Jay
uot; spam.
Just filter based on X-Spam-Level headers. If 8 is certainly spam then
have your server side filter or client filter look for 8 *s, then look
for 5 *s for probably spam. Very simple, no code changes needed.
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology De
We've had some false
positives with the X_LIBRARY, MIME_BOUND_RKFINDY rules being tripped on e-faxes
received through www.myvfm.com. Fairly obviously the
service has been built using the Indy.Sockets library (www.indyproject.org).
The Indyproject
knowledge base admits that headers similar t
What an interesting spam !
Which suggests a novel test, search for more than one 'From' or 'Subject'
header in an email. But how can I do this in SA ?
I know how to search the contents of the From or Subject headers which SA
makes available to me. But is it possible to write regexps to search
headers based on the "rcpt
to:" so you should assume that recipients bcc or not on the same remote
server may be able to discover each other. But if you're confident your
mail server/client isn't doing something stupid then there should be no
way for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to discover the message was BCCed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
Has anyone been getting these emails? I have received thirteen today on non existent accounts.
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: April 6, 2005 1:03:10 PM CDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HELLO
ALERT!
This e-mail, in its original form, contained one or more attached files
Not only sendmail, you can plug Milter filters into Perl programs using
Net::Milter from CPAN.
I've not tried plumbing it in yet, but it should certainly be possible.
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Bochmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 March 2005 18:51
To: users@spamas
11:47 AM 1/26/2005, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
I have been using sa-learn religiously with ALL spam and ham on my
server. However, I keep getting repeat spam with low scores. How can
I increase the sa-learn "points"? So that when I learn a message
instead of increasing some point by .1 or
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
