Alex wrote: > Hi, > > What settings do people typically have these days for the maximum > scanned message size? Surprisingly, at least to me, I'm seeing spam in > the 650k and 700k range, at least a few per hour, and are not scanned. > > Does anyone have any suggestions for optimizing the process for spam > containing just a large image that would therefore bypass the typical > scanning? Should I be scanning messages that large, then? > > Thanks, > Alex > I just bumped mine up from 150K to 1M to cover these new ones that contain a jpeg or png and are in the 500K range in size. I'm not sure if it'll matter too much to scan the odd email that's large.... I'll have to monitor my stats.
-lee
