Diego Pomatta schrieb:
> Ok, but then why is "auto-learn" learning spam, but not ham?
>
> Diego
Have a look at this, maybe it explains what you are wondering about:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutolearningNotWorking
Lars
Diego Pomatta schrieb:
> [...] And I
> can't feed anything to sa-learn because we drop spam into oblivion. (The
> only spam I can scavenge are the mails that SA didn't catch, but by that
> time those mails are in the users e-mail client in a host computer, not
> in the server.
> [...]
> So, is ther
Alex,
> For this, SA 3.2.* has its own rules for DNSWL, which you throw away
> with your custom rule, since they are identically named. The built-in
> rule for SA 3.2.* is:
>
> header RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW eval:check_rbl_sub('dnswl-firsttrusted',
> '127.0.\d+.1')
> describe RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
Matthias,
>> Now I added IPs to trusted_networks and that causes another problem: The
>> trusted_network IPs are in the DNSWL and therefore get a positive bonus
>> from SA.
>
> Hm, somehow I can't follow what you're trying to do. Can you post the
> relevant parts of your configuration?
Sure:
>
ase the IP of the scanned mail is in trusted_networks.
Is this possible or has somebody another way to solve it?
Lars Ippich
Karsten,
> That does *not* look like the default X-Spam-Report header as inserted
> when using report_safe 0. That looks like a custom added header. And a
> broken one, frankly...
You can see the header template at
http://mod.privatepaste.com/16TExHyOgg as it is inserted into the
local.cf file.
Karsten,
> Hmm, while the descriptions in the X-Spam-Status header definitely
> contained German Umlauts... I seem to remember seeing a list of Bayes
> tokens in there, too?
>
> How does such a header look like again exactly? :)
There you go:
> X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 on host vmail
>
> Sounds like he created a custom X-Spam header and forgot that us
> arrogant americans invented the internet and don't have 8 bit characters
> in our alphabet. ;-)
I am not sure if X-Spam-Report could really be called a custom header:
> X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 on host vmail
> sca
>> I do not specifically want to block these messages, I would
>> prefer a warning only policy. But I did not change any
>> amavisd settings beside the normal configuration stuff. So do
>> you know where these settings are done and where I can change them?
>>
> Look in ../etc/amavisd.conf* for $
Mark,
> Oct 10 09:17:05 www amavis[2981]: (02981-06) BAD HEADER from
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Non-encoded 8-bit data (char FC hex) in message
> header
> 'X-Spam-Report'\n X-Spam-Report: ... Nachricht wurde nur
> \\374bervertrauensw...\n
>
>> The administrator claims to b
Justin Mason wrote:
> Per Jessen writes:
>> Lars Ippich wrote:
>>
>>> I actually have problems with mails coming from a server where they
>>> already have been checked by SpamAssassin and have been added headers.
>>> Amavisd, which I am running on my serve
can the sender's mailserver's administrator do to make
SpamAssassin adding reports 7bit encoded?
Thank you for reading this.
Lars Ippich
12 matches
Mail list logo
