Hi all,
To solve that issues, we are currently moving and upgrading our servers.
This should be solved quickly .
Sorry for any inconvenience.
José Borges Ferreira
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:43 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> in case someone cares or even somebody from 'mailspike.net' is on this
>
Acording to this
https://twitter.com/spamhaus/status/545139926191575040 , 2 days ago
Spamhaus DBL had an issue and flagged all .net .
Perhaps it's related somehow .
José Borges Ferreira
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Dharma Monie wrote:
>
> Anyone experinced SA rule URIBL (spammhaus/local.cf
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> so received nightly with sa-update?
The scores are adjusted according to the corpus results there is
always some bias ...
>> That's the expected scoring distribution. We have in our system a more
>> generous scoring ranging from -0.5 to -3.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> something is here terrible wrong
>
> why does "average" is preferred over "excellent"
> why do H3 and H4 get a very less WL score?
> recently a clear spam message slipped by the -1.7 through
>
> describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 Average reputa
Hi Marcin,
I'm affiliated with Mailspike and just want to say that we have
changed the contact form so you now have a option specify that you are
contacting as Self-employed or private.
We have also configured ab...@mailspike.org if you need to contact directly.
Regarding your original problem,
etc.
>
In the end DMARC allows you as a receiver to understand better where
if a given email is spoofed or not. And that's mainly because it says
that SPF can break if DKIM passes and the other way around.
Keep in mind that DMARC is also about alignment. Envelope and Header
>From must align.
BTW: ADSP has moved to historical and won't be a good feature any more
Jose Borges Ferreira
I was wondering why MS costumers will have a 2.696+ penalty .
header AXB_X_ORIG_OMNIMS X-OriginatorOrg =~ /\.onmicrosoft\.com$/
describe AXB_X_ORIG_OMNIMS outbound.protection.outlook.com forwarders
score AXB_X_ORIG_OMNIMS 2.696 2.799 2.696 2.799
Any idea why is high ?
José Bo
On Sep 18, 2013 9:10 AM, "Axb" wrote:
>
> On 09/18/2013 09:48 AM, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
>>
>> The below log happens when I've scores set as 0.
>>
>> $ cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf | grep -E 'URI-(NS|A)'
>> score URI-NS 0
>> score URI-A 0
>
>
> these rules are not part of SA's ruleset.
>
>
Hi!
If you are intrested in Portuguese translations check this (
http://old.nabble.com/Questions-about-translating-rules-descriptions-td30642308.html).
I'm not sure if the bug was actually open, but ,at least, you can have
the translated file.
José Borges Ferreira
PS: It's pt_BR and not pt_PT.
2
Hi!
I usually install several versions of SA on the same machine without any
trouble.
Fo instance, to test 3.3.2-rc2 I used this procedure
1 wget
http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/3.3.2-rc2/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.2-rc2.tar.gz
2 wget -q
http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/3.3.2
10 matches
Mail list logo
