day differenc now :)
Regards,Gregor
From: hg user
Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2024 13:58
To: Grega
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Yes
Il Mar 12 Nov 2024, 13:53 Grega via users
mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org
If we used SQL and now switched to MySQL do we have to re-train bayes?
From: Bill Cole
Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2024 13:35
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On 2024-11-12 at 00:33:13 UTC-0500 (Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:33:13 -
Hi all.
I changed from SQL TO MySQL and first thing I noticed was that bayes_00
appeared back so definetly good sign.
Im on sick leave so I only changed my home instance so far...
Thanks Shawn!
From: Shawn Iverson
Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2024 06:33
To: users
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:14:25PM +, Grega via users wrote:
> Why one has "BAYES_60" and other 2 not?
>
> 4. Race condition (IDK I`m not coder)
What backend are you using for storing bayer data?
I'm not yet on 4.x (Debian Stable FTW), but in SA 3.x default was a
off.
From: Matija Nalis
Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2024 18:23
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:14:25PM +, Grega via users wrote:
> Why one has "BAYES_60" and other 2 not?
&
Hi.
Im on mysql backend.
Load is none ..
From: Matija Nalis
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 18:24
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:14:25PM +, Grega via users wrote:
> Why one
via users
Sent: Monday, 23 September 2024 15:14
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Hi again.
In V4 there is something wrong with bayes...
I received 3 identical mails (1 external sender, 3 internal recipients) and
scores are like this:
2 X like
Maybe disable VALIDITY rule as well... They also have 10k limit in 30 days
window ..
Regards,G
From: Bill Cole
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 19:03
To: SpamAssassin-Users
Subject: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default.
Context:
https://bz.apache.org/Sp
his issue...
>
>
> *From:* Reindl Harald (privat)
> *Sent:* Monday, 23 September 2024 15:20
> *To:* Grega; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Disable validity rules
>
>
> Am 23.09.24 um 15:15 schrieb Grega via us
: Re: Disable validity rules
Am 23.09.24 um 15:15 schrieb Grega via users:
> Where can one disable this?
>
> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
> Validity was blocked. See
> https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for mor
Hi.
Where can one disable this?
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validit
Hi again.
In V4 there is something wrong with bayes...
I received 3 identical mails (1 external sender, 3 internal recipients) and
scores are like this:
2 X like:
0.00ARC_SIGNED Message has a ARC signature
-0.10 ARC_VALID Message has a valid ARC signature
-0.40 DCC_REPUT_
Right now in SA 4.0.1 bayes at least for me is really challenging to train and
set up.
I had good trained DB from past V3 install, and it behaved really odd.
I trained it on new set of mails 3000 spam and 3000 ham (HAND PICKED mail it
was PAIN) and I cant get either BAYES_00 or BAYES_99 :)
I m
Sorry guys if I replied to all, my intentions were not to spam :)
From: Benny Pedersen
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2024 15:13
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Bill Cole skrev den 2024-09-13 15:03:
> Please send any replie
Do you have V3 or V4 SA?
From: Reindl Harald (privat)
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2024 10:57
To: Grega; Bill Cole; Grega via users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
autolearn was always a blackbox
that below are the stats for the current month and that
September 2024 10:22
To: Grega; Bill Cole; Grega via users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Am 13.09.24 um 06:53 schrieb Grega via users:
> And I`m reconfiguring autolearn to -4 for HAM and 12 for SPAM to really
> auto-train on correct mails...
this is even more nonsense than autolearn
September 2024 21:38
To: Grega via users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On 2024-09-12 at 14:05:11 UTC-0400 (Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:05:11 +0000)
Grega via users
is rumored to have said:
Hi.
I have SA 4.0.1 configured it, all is good, except for bayes. It IS working, it
IS learning b
Hi.
I have SA 4.0.1 configured it, all is good, except for bayes. It IS working, it
IS learning but when it classifies mail it is really not so decisive as it was
in V3.
I have:
dbg: bayes: corpus size: nspam = 1190, nham = 12441 dbg: bayes: DB expiry:
tokens in DB: 979401, Expiry max size: 15
18 matches
Mail list logo
