Oh well, this was my own goof then I guess. I run sendmail, and I'm a
programmer, but I don't do email for a living, so I only learn things as
I pick them up slowly.
On 7/15/2023 5:05 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 16/07/2023 04:44, Cathryn Mataga wrote:
Someone has figured a way to
I just fixed a problem like this. I checked my headers, and the email
was spf approved from google. I had included google so I could get some
mail forwarded by them back awhile ago, but it's not worth getting this
spam. Someone has figured a way to use gmail to spam from their
servers, looks l
On 10/25/2014 9:29 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Cathryn Mataga wrote:
Received: from ecuador.junglevision.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
ecuador.junglevision.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s9P2o1ZZ026032
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits
Okay, here's another header.Shows X-Xpam-Status as no.
In local.cf I changed to this, just to be sure.
rewrite_header Subject [SPAM][JUNGLEVISION SPAM CHECK]
Return-Path:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
ecuador.junglevision.com
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam
On 10/20/14, 9:46 AM, jdebert wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:39:57 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 17.10.14 10:08, jdebert wrote:
Will URIBL_BLOCKED cause [SPAM] to be inserted into Subject?
no, it will more likely cause [SPAM] _not_ to be inserted, because it
wouldn't be detected.
???
Are you using imap to fetch your mail?
Thanks guys. Yes I am using imap. What I have is a .procmailrc that
forwards to meganspam. That's how this email got to meganspam. Is
spamassasin is running twice? Once going to megan@ and then at
meganspam@. Wh
y the blacklists think you exceeded the free
limit: they count queries per DNS server since that's what sends the
queries to them. To avoid this you should be running a private,
non-forwarding DNS server.
On 17.10.14 09:17, Cathryn Mataga wrote:
I run DNS on my network. I think it should
On 10/17/14, 4:13 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 22:37 -0700, Cathryn Mataga wrote:
The score is only 1.9, 3.5 required. What's going on here?
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,
EMAIL_URI_PHISH,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_DNSW
The score is only 1.9, 3.5 required. What's going on here?
From me...@ecuador.junglevision.com Mon Oct 13 08:38:09 2014
Return-Path:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
ecuador.junglevision.com
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=3.5 tests=BAYE
My local.cf
has this.
bayes_file_mode 0666
use_bayes 1
use_auto_learn 0
skip_rbl_checks 0
rbl_timeout 3
score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 3
score RCVD_IN_URIBL_SBL 3
But then I see a spam that I keep training as spam over and over again,
but then it keeps getting auto-learned as Ham.
How d
On 11/20/2012 4:29 AM, Jason Ede wrote:
However, ISP's blocking smtp ports for suspected spammers would help... Ideally
they'd block all traffic on port 25 or 587 not sent through their SMTP engine
which would do some basic spam checks...
Easy enough to block #25 by default -- turn it on for
Here's another version. This successfully recognises all four of your
examples and doesn't fire on any of my other spam test messages:
describe MG_TWOLETTER_OBFUSCATION Two letter obfuscation (X:X X :X))
header MG_TWOLETTER_OBFUSCATION
Subject =~ /[A-Z][:%~;^][A-Z]\s{0,1}[:%~;^][A-Z0
On 11/8/2012 8:58 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 07:23 -0800, R - elists wrote:
is anyone else getting spam from venamail.com servers ?
No.
Martin
I just grepped a gigabyte collection of spam for venamail.com and found
nothing.
On 10/24/2012 8:35 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
24.10.2012 18:19, Ned Slider kirjoitti:
I have had very good success running adjusted scores for BAYES rules,
but I am very careful how I train my bayes database. I've disabled
auto-learning and only manually train on hand-checked ham and spam
examp
And that no amount of training will fix it once it goes bad. I was
getting maybe 30-40 spams through
every day and many of them marked BAYES_00 -- and the last month I've
been carefully feeding the
software spam and ham lists, all carefully checked, but so much of it
just kept coming in.
But
Thanks for the comments. I'll see if I can cook something up here.
Someone asked to see the
actual messages.
I collected 4 of these messages and put them at this link.
http://www.mataga.net/mataga/spam.txt
I'm getting a lot of SPAM with words written like this. These are pretty
horrible, and I don't like
getting them every day.
A:N ;A %L"
P:O ~R %N ( P &lCT U #R&E /
Is there a way to make a rule for strings of characters that would
ignoring non-alpha characters embedded
in the string?
I'm getting these messages, some of them real emails, that get marked
with [SPAM]
even though X-Spam-Status: comes up as No. I updated to the latest build on
Fedora though I think this has been going on awhile. It happens with
some email
accounts but not others.
From me...@ecuador.junglevis
18 matches
Mail list logo
