On 10/24/2012 8:35 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
24.10.2012 18:19, Ned Slider kirjoitti:
I have had very good success running adjusted scores for BAYES rules,
but I am very careful how I train my bayes database. I've disabled
auto-learning and only manually train on hand-checked ham and spam
examples. Consequently, I find the extremes (BAYES_99 and BAYES_00) to
be highly reliable indicators.
I have never seen false BAYES_99, but false BAYES_00 is not that rare.
I'm not sure what's going on, but i cleared Bayes, and set
use_auto_learn 0
and then relearned from HAM/Spam messages, and checking for yesterday, I
got 12 spam, every single one had BAYES_00 set.
I do get a vast amount of spam coming in here, so that 12 is down from
several hundred spam that got marked correctly.
