On 14 May 2019, at 07:52, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote:
> [root@server ~] # spamassassin --version
> SpamAssassin version 3.4.1
> running on Perl version 5.10.1
5.10? Isn't that like... 15 years old? Definitely at least 10.
So I don't think perl updates is your problem.
--
My little brother got hi
On Tue, 14 May 2019 10:18:35 -0400
Kris Deugau wrote:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 14.05.19 06:18, cyflhn wrote:
> >> but what about this one "FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO". why it got 2.1
> As for the score, it's autogenerated based on statistical analysis of
> a large corpus of mail alon
On Tue, 14 May 2019, cyflhn wrote:
It has happened many times that the emails from our server were identified as
spam. I have checked the emails which were not identified as spam. But I
found that the SpamAssassin Scoring For MDAEMON_DNSBL is quite high, the
score of MDAEMON_DNSBL is always 4. I
+1.001. Score it as a .001
On Tue, May 14, 2019, 10:18 Bill Cole <
sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
> On 14 May 2019, at 11:03, RW wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 14 May 2019 01:32:43 -0400
> > Bill Cole wrote:
> >
> >> On 14 May 2019, at 0:41, Siddhesh wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Folks,
> >>>
>
On 14 May 2019, at 11:03, RW wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2019 01:32:43 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
On 14 May 2019, at 0:41, Siddhesh wrote:
Hello Folks,
Can we have a SpamAssassin score for a domain which doesn't have
SPF record set ??
The rule SPF_NONE exists in the standard rules channel. It is
cu
On Tue, 14 May 2019 01:32:43 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 14 May 2019, at 0:41, Siddhesh wrote:
>
> > Hello Folks,
> >
> > Can we have a SpamAssassin score for a domain which doesn't have
> > SPF record set ??
>
> The rule SPF_NONE exists in the standard rules channel. It is
> currently scored
On Tue, 14 May 2019 05:49:24 -0700 (MST)
cyflhn wrote:
> Thank you for your reply. But are you sure that it was caused by
> bad.psky.me? I could not find any useful information about
> bad.psky.me. It seems that it has been already shutdown.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://spamassassin.106534
On Tue, 14 May 2019 15:35:43 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 14.05.19 06:18, cyflhn wrote:
> >but what about this one "FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO". why it got 2.1
> >score?
>
> this is standard rule where mail pretending to come from one freemail
> service really comes from another freema
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 14.05.19 06:18, cyflhn wrote:
but what about this one "FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO". why it got 2.1 score?
this is standard rule where mail predenting to come from one freemail
service really comes from another freemail service.
Actually, unless I misread the rul
Hello,
I'm afraid that someone updated some python (maybe perl?) component and there
are SpamAssassin plugins that stopped working.
Any idea how to correct this error?
May 14 10:47:30 server spamd[2041]: spamd: error: failed to obtain port and ip
from socket at /usr/bin/spamd line 1594.
May 14
On 14.05.19 06:18, cyflhn wrote:
but what about this one "FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO". why it got 2.1 score?
this is standard rule where mail predenting to come from one freemail
service really comes from another freemail service.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas
but what about this one "FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO". why it got 2.1 score?
--
Sent from: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-Users-f3.html
Thank you for your reply. But are you sure that it was caused by bad.psky.me?
I could not find any useful information about bad.psky.me. It seems that it
has been already shutdown.
--
Sent from: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-Users-f3.html
MDAEMON_DNSBL is not a stock SA rule.
This is a custom rule added by Alt-N/MDAEMON which uses SA.
You will need to contact them for further help
On 5/14/19 11:44 AM, cyflhn wrote:
It has happened many times that the emails from our server were identified as
spam. I have checked the emails whic
KAM.cf has lazy domain security rules as well.
On Tue, May 14, 2019, 01:33 Bill Cole <
sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
> On 14 May 2019, at 0:41, Siddhesh wrote:
>
> > Hello Folks,
> >
> > Can we have a SpamAssassin score for a domain which doesn't have SPF
> > record set ??
>
> T
It has happened many times that the emails from our server were identified as
spam. I have checked the emails which were not identified as spam. But I
found that the SpamAssassin Scoring For MDAEMON_DNSBL is quite high, the
score of MDAEMON_DNSBL is always 4. I also checked the logs of SpamAssassin
16 matches
Mail list logo
