+1.001. Score it as a .001 On Tue, May 14, 2019, 10:18 Bill Cole < sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
> On 14 May 2019, at 11:03, RW wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 May 2019 01:32:43 -0400 > > Bill Cole wrote: > > > >> On 14 May 2019, at 0:41, Siddhesh wrote: > >> > >>> Hello Folks, > >>> > >>> Can we have a SpamAssassin score for a domain which doesn't have > >>> SPF record set ?? > >> > >> The rule SPF_NONE exists in the standard rules channel. It is > >> currently scored at 0 by default. > > > > I don't see why it isn't scored at 0.001. > > The relevant comment in the 50_scores.cf file offers a dubious > justification that scoring it would encourage spammers to publish valid > SPF records just to avoid the rule. This would be a problem if SPF_PASS > had a strong ham score and lots of spammers used domains theyb owned > without SPF but I don't really see the logic when SPF_PASS is scored at > -0.001 and not having any SPF record is no longer the mark of a spammer > but rather a mark of mail apathy. > >
