On 3/15/2016 6:26 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
we have scripts checking any samples against current bayes
classification and ignore them if they already have BAYES_99,
Is this even necessary? I thought the learner automatically
rejected everything alre
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
we have scripts checking any samples against current bayes
classification and ignore them if they already have BAYES_99,
Is this even necessary? I thought the learner automatically
rejected everything already tagged.
Already *learned*. There's
On 3/15/2016 2:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2016 um 22:24 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
Baloney - spamoney!!!
I do not use autolearning, and ALL my spam is either hand-selected or it
comes from honeypot addresses that have NEVER been on my domains - I get
these honeypot addresses by sca
I am sorry to return to this horse which has perhaps been beaten
enough. But I still don't know and don't understand (_after_ reading
the docs) if I can, at the same time:
1. completely disable expiry
2. force a sync of the journal
I just saw with my own eyes that passing --sync to sa-learn doe
On 3/15/2016 5:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
a lot of nosense
* nobody is talking about throw away *any* other rules
Uh, why yes, they are:
"Some other systems such as isnotspam.com caught some SA rule which
DOESENT EXIST ANYMORE in latest SA."
sure seems like SOMEONE IS talking about th
Am 15.03.2016 um 22:15 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
It's foolish to throw away working rulesets and put all your eggs in the
Bayes basket. Bayes is not a panacea. I kind of feel there is a
NIH mentality among the spamassassin maintainers when it comes to
rulesets
a lot of nosense
* nobody is t
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:15:53 -0700
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> It's foolish to throw away working rulesets and put all your eggs in
> the Bayes basket. Bayes is not a panacea. I kind of feel there is a
> NIH mentality among the spamassassin maintainers when it comes to
> rulesets - it's like "we
Am 15.03.2016 um 22:24 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
Baloney - spamoney!!!
I do not use autolearning, and ALL my spam is either hand-selected or it
comes from honeypot addresses that have NEVER been on my domains - I get
these honeypot addresses by scanning the mail log and looking for
guesses by
Baloney - spamoney!!!
I do not use autolearning, and ALL my spam is either hand-selected or it
comes from honeypot addresses that have NEVER been on my domains - I get
these honeypot addresses by scanning the mail log and looking for
guesses by spammers - when I see a popular address in the "gue
On 3/15/2016 2:01 PM, David B Funk wrote:
IE, out of the 130KB of that message, only a few dozen bytes is actually
the spam 'payload' and thus Bayes wise gets swamped by the O365 noise.
I'm considering tagging most of the O365 headers with bayes_ignore_header.
Anybody else wrestling with this
Am 15.03.2016 um 22:01 schrieb David B Funk:
Actually this is one case where Bayes may not be a help. Our campus
recently
outsourced almost all users to O365. As a consequence our Bayes gets a
-lot- of ham from O365 and therefore has most of its fingerprints tagged
as ham.
Thus it takes a very
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Kris Deugau wrote:
Robert Boyl wrote:
Hi, everyone
Please check http://pastebin.com/GUBqpyZ8
Interesting how some spams that abuse some legit account such as this
one are hard to detect, how Spamassassin scores almost nothing although
there are spammy works, etc. System c
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 08:55:46 +1300
Philip wrote:
> After turning on TxRep I get these lines in my /var/log/spamd.log
> file.
>
> Wed Mar 16 08:21:55 2016 [16629] warn: Use of uninitialized value
> $msgscore in addition (+) at /etc/spamassassin/TxRep.pm line 1414.
> Wed Mar 16 08:21:55 2016 [1662
After turning on TxRep I get these lines in my /var/log/spamd.log file.
Wed Mar 16 08:21:55 2016 [16629] warn: Use of uninitialized value
$msgscore in addition (+) at /etc/spamassassin/TxRep.pm line 1414.
Wed Mar 16 08:21:55 2016 [16629] warn: Use of uninitialized value
$msgscore in subtraction
--
Charles Sprickman
NetEng/SysAdmin
Bway.net - New York's Best Internet www.bway.net
sp...@bway.net - 212.982.9800
> On Mar 15, 2016, at 12:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 15.03.2016 um 17:07 schrieb Robert Boyl:
>> Hi, everyone
>>
>> Please check http://pastebin.com/GUBqpyZ8
>>
>
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Robert Chalmers wrote:
Found a copy here …
http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/antispam/sa-stats.pl
Note that I also host a version that works with gzipped log files, if you
have compression enabled in your log rotator.
But that's not the latest. I don't know where the v1.03
Am 15.03.2016 um 17:07 schrieb Robert Boyl:
Hi, everyone
Please check http://pastebin.com/GUBqpyZ8
Interesting how some spams that abuse some legit account such as this
one are hard to detect, how Spamassassin scores almost nothing although
there are spammy works, etc. System caught DCC_CHECK
Robert Boyl wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
> Please check http://pastebin.com/GUBqpyZ8
>
> Interesting how some spams that abuse some legit account such as this
> one are hard to detect, how Spamassassin scores almost nothing although
> there are spammy works, etc. System caught DCC_CHECK 1.10.
>
> Som
Hi, everyone
Please check http://pastebin.com/GUBqpyZ8
Interesting how some spams that abuse some legit account such as this one
are hard to detect, how Spamassassin scores almost nothing although there
are spammy works, etc. System caught DCC_CHECK 1.10.
Some other systems such as isnotspam.com
19 matches
Mail list logo
