Baloney - spamoney!!!
I do not use autolearning, and ALL my spam is either hand-selected or it
comes from honeypot addresses that have NEVER been on my domains - I get
these honeypot addresses by scanning the mail log and looking for
guesses by spammers - when I see a popular address in the "guess bin"
I set it up as a honeypot - and within 6 months it's getting thousands
of spams a week. And the ham comes from me and from a select group of
users who have large amounts of mail stored on the system that is all
clean.
Bayes is NOT the answer to everything!!!!
Ted
On 3/15/2016 2:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2016 um 22:01 schrieb David B Funk:
Actually this is one case where Bayes may not be a help. Our campus
recently
outsourced almost all users to O365. As a consequence our Bayes gets a
-lot- of ham from O365 and therefore has most of its fingerprints tagged
as ham.
Thus it takes a very spammy message passed thu O365 to get anything but
BAYES_00
get rid of autolearning, maintain your bayes by hand and strip most
headers from samples and all that problems are gone away
especially strip Received headers from samples and put one generic on top
