Re: Try my IXHASH

2015-12-06 Thread sebast...@debianfan.de
Do i use this with the ixhash plugin? > Am 07.12.2015 um 05:41 schrieb Marc Perkel : > > ixhashdnsbl CTYME_IXHASH ixhash.junkemailfilter.com. > bodyCTYME_IXHASH eval:check_ixhash('CTYME_IXHASH') > describeCTYME_IXHASH iXhash found @ ixhash.junkemailfilter.com > tflags

Try my IXHASH

2015-12-06 Thread Marc Perkel
ixhashdnsbl CTYME_IXHASH ixhash.junkemailfilter.com. bodyCTYME_IXHASH eval:check_ixhash('CTYME_IXHASH') describeCTYME_IXHASH iXhash found @ ixhash.junkemailfilter.com tflags CTYME_IXHASH net score CTYME_IXHASH 5 Let me know if it's useful. -- Marc Perk

Re: False positives with Razor2

2015-12-06 Thread RW
On Sun, 06 Dec 2015 09:28:08 +0100 Torsten Bronger wrote: > Hallöchen! > > Bill Cole writes: > > > [...] > > > > Indicates that someone has sabotaged your SA scores. Those are > > entirely insane scores for those tests. If the default values were > > used, that message would not have been miscla

Re: DIGEST_MULTIPLE / IXHASH

2015-12-06 Thread Reindl Harald
thanks for "meta IXHASH_CHECK (GENERIC_IXHASH || NIXSPAM_IXHASH || SEM_IXHASH)" - wasn't aware that you can build a meta-rule based on when other rules hit that easy repalcement for DIGSET_MULTIPLE is now enabled with 0.001 for testing Am 06.12.2015 um 11:32 schrieb Axb: On 12/06/2015 11:28 A

Re: DIGEST_MULTIPLE / IXHASH

2015-12-06 Thread Axb
On 12/06/2015 11:28 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 06.12.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Axb: On 12/06/2015 11:05 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: would it be possible to consider "GENERIC_IXHASH", "NIXSPAM_IXHASH" and "SEM_IXHASH" also for DIGEST_MULTIPLE? not in default SA's metas The third party iXhash plug

Re: DIGEST_MULTIPLE / IXHASH

2015-12-06 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.12.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Axb: On 12/06/2015 11:05 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: would it be possible to consider "GENERIC_IXHASH", "NIXSPAM_IXHASH" and "SEM_IXHASH" also for DIGEST_MULTIPLE? not in default SA's metas The third party iXhash plugin is not included in default SA. over the m

Re: DIGEST_MULTIPLE / IXHASH

2015-12-06 Thread Axb
On 12/06/2015 11:05 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: would it be possible to consider "GENERIC_IXHASH", "NIXSPAM_IXHASH" and "SEM_IXHASH" also for DIGEST_MULTIPLE? not in default SA's metas The third party iXhash plugin is not included in default SA. over the months i see a lot of hits "PYZOR + IXHA

DIGEST_MULTIPLE / IXHASH

2015-12-06 Thread Reindl Harald
would it be possible to consider "GENERIC_IXHASH", "NIXSPAM_IXHASH" and "SEM_IXHASH" also for DIGEST_MULTIPLE? over the months i see a lot of hits "PYZOR + IXHASH", "RAZOR + IXHASH" without "PYZOR + RAZOR" and currently DIGEST_MULTIPLE don't hit spamassassin-iXhash2-2.05-7.fc21.noarch s

Re: False positives with Razor2

2015-12-06 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.12.2015 um 09:28 schrieb Torsten Bronger: And don't trust whoever set your BAYES and RAZOR scores to have anything to do with your spam control. Well, I don't trust Razor anymore! If there is such a thing as "the opposite of spam", then these mails. nonsense, hence this is a scoring

Re: False positives with Razor2

2015-12-06 Thread Torsten Bronger
Hallöchen! Bill Cole writes: > [...] > > Indicates that someone has sabotaged your SA scores. Those are > entirely insane scores for those tests. If the default values were > used, that message would not have been misclassified. I myself set those values, almost 10 years ago. They have served v