Re: DIGEST_MULTIPLE / IXHASH

[Reindl Harald]

thanks for "meta IXHASH_CHECK (GENERIC_IXHASH || NIXSPAM_IXHASH || SEM_IXHASH)" - wasn't aware that you can build a meta-rule based on when other rules hit that easy

repalcement for DIGSET_MULTIPLE is now enabled with 0.001 for testing

Am 06.12.2015 um 11:32 schrieb Axb:

On 12/06/2015 11:28 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:

Am 06.12.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Axb:

On 12/06/2015 11:05 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:

would it be possible to consider "GENERIC_IXHASH", "NIXSPAM_IXHASH" and
"SEM_IXHASH" also for DIGEST_MULTIPLE?

not in default SA's metas

The third party iXhash plugin is not included in default SA.

over the months i see a lot of hits "PYZOR + IXHASH", "RAZOR + IXHASH"
without "PYZOR + RAZOR" and currently DIGEST_MULTIPLE don't hit

spamassassin-iXhash2-2.05-7.fc21.noarch

DIGEST_MULTIPLE is about  PYZOR/RAZOR/DCC

I'd disable DIGEST_MULTIPLE and write my own metas for the locally
enabled plugins/rules

well, not sure how to get a meta-rule "IXHASH_CHECK" when
"GENERIC_IXHASH", "NIXSPAM_IXHASH" or "SEM_IXHASH" had a hit done in
"local.cf" to use it like below

meta IXHASH_CHECK (GENERIC_IXHASH || NIXSPAM_IXHASH || SEM_IXHASH)

meta     DIGEST_MULTIPLE_LOCAL RAZOR2_CHECK + DCC_CHECK + PYZOR_CHECK +
IXHASH_CHECK > 1
describe DIGEST_MULTIPLE_LOCAL Message hits more than one network digest
check
tflags   DIGEST_MULTIPLE_LOCAL net
score    DIGEST_MULTIPLE_LOCAL 0.001

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature