Am 06.12.2015 um 09:28 schrieb Torsten Bronger:
And don't trust whoever set your BAYES and RAZOR scores to have anything to do with your spam control.Well, I don't trust Razor anymore! If there is such a thing as "the opposite of spam", then these mails.
nonsense, hence this is a scoring system and you ruined it with zero understanding that the scores you raised are even adaptive while "6.0 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100" is nothing else than idiotic - soryr there is no nicer word for scoring a remote hash-system not controlled at your own that high
> They have served very well through those times with > 15.000 spams/yearwell, below the razor hits on a machine having 6000 spamass-milter rejects each month with no false-positives
RAZOR: 2165 RAZOR: 1600 RAZOR: 1516 RAZOR: 1394 RAZOR: 1480 RAZOR: 1489
Besides, I personally see no point in a crowdsourcing tool with scores on the level of "HTML_IMAGE_ONLY"
really?than you don't know much about mailusers - a crowdsourcing has always false positives caused by idiots marking their newsletters as spam instead click on the unsubscribe link, frankly there are enough of them which confuse "delete" and "mark as spam" all the time
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
