On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:07 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 02/07/2015 04:23, Alex a écrit :
Not sure if the Unicode replace stuff will catch it, but you might try
this:
body FUZZY_DETAILS
/(?:etails)/
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 02.07.2015 02:56, Alex wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I've been receiving a handful of spam claiming to be from whatsapp,
>> and I can't figure out how to block it.
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/8E66QRkn
>> http://pastebin.com/KrTgKGh1
>>
>> What does
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:07 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, John Wilcock wrote:
>
>> Le 02/07/2015 04:23, Alex a écrit :
>>>
>>> > Not sure if the Unicode replace stuff will catch it, but you might try
>>> > > this:
>>> > > > >body FUZZY_DETAILS
>>> > > > > /(?:et
On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 23:40:04 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> RW skrev den 2015-07-02 23:21:
> > On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 19:21:12 +0200
> > Benny Pedersen wrote:
> >> co.dk was dropped before it got populary, i dont like to se tlds
> >> that try to force nic to sell less,
> >
> > I'm not sure what you
Am 02.07.2015 um 23:40 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
RW skrev den 2015-07-02 23:21:
On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 19:21:12 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
John Hardin skrev den 2015-07-02 19:08:
>> # if version >3.3.x
>> blacklist_uri_hosts co.uk
>
> That seems to be a rather big hammer you're recommending. Of
RW skrev den 2015-07-02 23:21:
On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 19:21:12 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
John Hardin skrev den 2015-07-02 19:08:
>> # if version >3.3.x
>> blacklist_uri_hosts co.uk
>
> That seems to be a rather big hammer you're recommending. Of course,
> if you don't do any business with anyon
On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 19:21:12 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> John Hardin skrev den 2015-07-02 19:08:
>
> >> # if version >3.3.x
> >> blacklist_uri_hosts co.uk
> >
> > That seems to be a rather big hammer you're recommending. Of course,
> > if you don't do any business with anyone in the UK (and do
> I want to do this because there are some senders who are vulnerable to
> phishing or forgery but still don't bother to use SPF or DKIM. I can work out
> who they use as outbound servers through by learning from traffic patterns,
> and I want to give some SA credit when they're sending through
On 02.07.2015 18:52, Benny Pedersen wrote:
# if version >3.3.x
blacklist_uri_hosts co.uk
Lets blame a heatwave...
you can't be serious suggesting such a thing in public
Am 02.07.2015 um 19:21 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
John Hardin skrev den 2015-07-02 19:08:
# if version >3.3.x
blacklist_uri_hosts co.uk
That seems to be a rather big hammer you're recommending. Of course,
if you don't do any business with anyone in the UK (and don't ever
intend to) it may be r
John Hardin skrev den 2015-07-02 19:08:
# if version >3.3.x
blacklist_uri_hosts co.uk
That seems to be a rather big hammer you're recommending. Of course,
if you don't do any business with anyone in the UK (and don't ever
intend to) it may be reasonable.
co.dk was dropped before it got popul
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Alex skrev den 2015-07-02 02:56:
http: //pastebin.com/8E66QRkn
http: //pastebin.com/KrTgKGh1
# if version >3.3.x
blacklist_uri_hosts co.uk
That seems to be a rather big hammer you're recommending. Of course, if
you don't do any business with anyon
Alex skrev den 2015-07-02 02:56:
http://pastebin.com/8E66QRkn
http://pastebin.com/KrTgKGh1
# if version >3.3.x
blacklist_uri_hosts co.uk
# for all versions
and sagrey plugin, track single ipv4, and ipv6 /64
i dont use txrep since it seems its does not yet works with sagrey :/
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 02/07/2015 04:23, Alex a écrit :
> Not sure if the Unicode replace stuff will catch it, but you might try
> this:
> >
> >body FUZZY_DETAILS /(?:etails)/i
> >replace_rules FUZZY_DETAILS
It doesn't catch it, and I don't know enough
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 02/07/2015 04:50, John Hardin a écrit :
> Is there supposed to be an existing FUZZY_DETAILS rule?
I don't think so.
If you were to envisage such a rule, it's worth noting that it would almost
certainly need a special case to avoid FPs on genuine
Le 02/07/2015 04:23, Alex a écrit :
Not sure if the Unicode replace stuff will catch it, but you might try this:
>
> body FUZZY_DETAILS /(?:etails)/i
> replace_rules FUZZY_DETAILS
It doesn't catch it, and I don't know enough about replace_rules to
figure it out.
Shouldn't that ?:
Le 02/07/2015 04:50, John Hardin a écrit :
Is there supposed to be an existing FUZZY_DETAILS rule?
I don't think so.
If you were to envisage such a rule, it's worth noting that it would
almost certainly need a special case to avoid FPs on genuine French
"détails" with an acute accent. There
On 02.07.2015 02:56, Alex wrote:
Hi guys,
I've been receiving a handful of spam claiming to be from whatsapp,
and I can't figure out how to block it.
http://pastebin.com/8E66QRkn
http://pastebin.com/KrTgKGh1
What does a legitimate whatsapp email look like? I've searched their
site, and their D
18 matches
Mail list logo
