Re: Can SpamAssasin convert UTF8 into ISO-8859-1?

2015-04-15 Thread @lbutlr
On Apr 13, 2015, at 09:03, John Hardin wrote: > The proper place for that sort of thing would be the tool that does final > delivery to the user's mailbox. There is no proper place for that. -- LOOSE TEETH DON'T NEED MY HELP Bart chalkboard Ep. AABF16

Re: spam

2015-04-15 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 4/15/2015 10:07 AM, Odpadový hospodár s.r.o. wrote: Yes, they wrote me that it is questin for your company. They are wrong. We write software. If they use it, they are responsible for it's integration, maintenance, etc. See https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/StopBlockingMyMail Regard

Re: effectiveness of DCC checks?

2015-04-15 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 4/14/2015 5:43 PM, John Hardin wrote: It's not. The 1.1 points is hardcoded: 50_scores.cf:score DCC_CHECK0 1.1 0 1.1 It's reasonable to argue that this score should be informational only, and that it should only be scored meaningfully in metas. It doesn't look like masscheck

Re: effectiveness of DCC checks?

2015-04-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.04.2015 um 10:24 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: Am 14.04.2015 um 20:44 schrieb Dave Pooser: Finally I would submit that if the phrase "sometimes wrong, but never uncertain" sounds like a description of your mailing list posts, it¹s worth putting the effort in to change that On 14.04.1

Re: effectiveness of DCC checks?

2015-04-15 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Am 14.04.2015 um 20:44 schrieb Dave Pooser: Finally I would submit that if the phrase "sometimes wrong, but never uncertain" sounds like a description of your mailing list posts, it¹s worth putting the effort in to change that On 14.04.15 20:49, Reindl Harald wrote: nobody is perfect, but if i