On 11/23/2014 2:17 AM, Aban Dokht wrote:
On 22.11.2014 22:32, Dave Funk wrote:
Another way to seed spamtrap addresses is to make up some and
then feed them into "unsubscribe" links in spam sent to regular
users. I've got some of those I started that way 15 years ago
and they're still going s
On 11/23/2014 2:12 AM, Aban Dokht wrote:
On 22.11.2014 22:05, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
That's a lot of work, there's a much easier way
Just search your /var/log/maillog for user unknown messages, and
create email addresses for the unknown users which are showing up
multiple times over multip
On 11/22/2014 07:16 PM PST, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2014, Igor Chudov wrote:
>> I receive spam emails that contain extremely long URLs, about 2,400
>> characters. I wanted to know if spamassassin has a rule that I can
>> turn on to flag such URLs. I do not think that I ever receive
>> l
On 23/11/2014 20:12, Aban Dokht wrote:
> On 22.11.2014 22:05, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
>> domain - I've seen user unknown messages for users who cancelled mailboxes
>> on the domain over a decade ago. I figure 10 years of getting user unknown
>> messages is long enough for any real humans
On 24/11/2014 00:07, Igor Chudov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 07:16:38PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2014, Igor Chudov wrote: I receive spam emails that contain
> extremely long URLs, about 2,400 characters. I wanted to know if spamassassin
> has a rule that I can turn on
On 24/11/2014 01:18, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 22.11.14 20:22, Igor Chudov wrote:
>
>> I have a special perl script, that I wrote, that scans emails, makes a WHOIS
>> query via a perl WHOIS module, and looks at the creation date.
>
> this was already discussed and discouraged - you
Hello Reindl,
Is you message supposed to contain some hidden meaningful information given
that all it does it give some details of your setup?
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:55:41 PM, you wrote:
RH> Bignum.pm
RH> Am 11.11.2014 um 15:48 schrieb Niamh Holding:
>>
>> Hello Axb,
>>
>> Tuesday, Nov
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 4:54:44 PM, you wrote:
RH> the spamassassin part of the issue was explained
But no fix provided, as far as I'm concerned everything that follows is
in pursuit of working DNS checks and when that is achieved then further
discussion would indeed be off top
Am 23.11.2014 um 14:11 schrieb Niamh Holding:
RH> realize that this is *not* the mailing list for OS problems
I guess only a dumb blonde would think it appropriate to ask about
spamassassin not performing DNS checks on the spamassassin list
the spamassassin part of the issue was explained and
On 22.11.14 20:22, Igor Chudov wrote:
I have a special perl script, that I wrote, that scans emails, makes a
WHOIS query via a perl WHOIS module, and looks at the creation date.
this was already discussed and discouraged - you may get blocked at whois
servers. DOB is a RBL created for this use.
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 11:15:27 AM, you wrote:
RH> he old RHEL5
CentOS 5 doesn't go end of life until 2017
RH> seeing even fc6 packages
Only if offered by-
base: repo.bigstepcloud.com
* epel: mirror.bytemark.co.uk
* extras: anorien.csc.warwick.ac.uk
* rpmforge: mirror.
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 07:16:38PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2014, Igor Chudov wrote:
>
> >I receive spam emails that contain extremely long URLs, about 2,400
> >characters. I wanted to know if spamassassin has a rule that I can
> >turn on to flag such URLs. I do not think that I
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 11:21:56 AM, you wrote:
RH> frankly your whole quoting style is just *rude*
That's damn rich!
RH> but after seeing the mess with Fedora packages on CentOS
As you well know that was suggested by another list member!
RH> in wich context you confirmed a
Am 23.11.2014 um 12:05 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:44:09 AM, you wrote:
RH> you don't get it - the *context* is important
You don't get it "in your own words" is stating that I have rewritten the
output myself and what I quoted was not was was on the scr
Am 23.11.2014 um 12:03 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:49:01 AM, you wrote:
RH> looking 2 seconds on the output below (you stripped originally)
The original pst included-
"Package perl.i386 4:5.8.8-43.el5_11 set to be updated"
i am working for a decace n
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:44:09 AM, you wrote:
RH> you don't get it - the *context* is important
You don't get it "in your own words" is stating that I have rewritten the
output myself and what I quoted was not was was on the screen!
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:49:01 AM, you wrote:
RH> looking 2 seconds on the output below (you stripped originally)
The original pst included-
"Package perl.i386 4:5.8.8-43.el5_11 set to be updated"
RH> i
RH> see you system want to install i386 packages on a x86_64 setup
Tha
Am 23.11.2014 um 11:41 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:32:36 AM, you wrote:
RH> i am out of this thread - you continue to strip the context out of
RH> quotes and this is *not* a complete, uncutted console input/output
There is no point in posting superfluo
Am 23.11.2014 um 11:30 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:15:50 AM, you wrote:
RH> pack them in your own
RH> words
Further the original quotes are cut and paste and not IN MY OWN WORDS
you don't get it - the *context* is important and only visible by *any*
o
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:32:36 AM, you wrote:
RH> i am out of this thread - you continue to strip the context out of
RH> quotes and this is *not* a complete, uncutted console input/output
There is no point in posting superfluous stuff!
Yum has clearly stated that
Package 4:
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:15:50 AM, you wrote:
RH> pack them in your own
RH> words
Further the original quotes are cut and paste and not IN MY OWN WORDS
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgp2PUIRR_mwv.pgp
Description: PGP signat
Am 23.11.2014 um 11:28 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:15:50 AM, you wrote:
RH> *lease* start to post complete outputs instead pack them in your own
RH> words to help others helping you
The missing stuff!
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds
Am 23.11.2014 um 11:17 schrieb Aban Dokht:
On 22.11.2014 22:32, Dave Funk wrote:
Another way to seed spamtrap addresses is to make up some and
then feed them into "unsubscribe" links in spam sent to regular
users. I've got some of those I started that way 15 years ago
and they're still going s
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:15:50 AM, you wrote:
RH> *lease* start to post complete outputs instead pack them in your own
RH> words to help others helping you
The missing stuff!
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: repo.bigstepcloud
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 12:38:00 PM, you wrote:
A> yum install
A> http://pkgs.repoforge.org/perl-Net-DNS/perl-Net-DNS-0.71-1.el5.rfx.x86_64.rpm
"yum install perl-Net-DNS" shows-
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: repo.bigstepcloud.com
* epel: mirror.bytemar
On 22.11.2014 22:32, Dave Funk wrote:
Another way to seed spamtrap addresses is to make up some and
then feed them into "unsubscribe" links in spam sent to regular
users. I've got some of those I started that way 15 years ago
and they're still going strong.
Also no good idea, as some of them
Am 23.11.2014 um 10:58 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:52:10 PM, you wrote:
RH> "perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64" is part of 5.11
RH> this is completly untested and unsupported < CentOS 5.11
Axb's "yum update -y" was done and I'm seeing-
Package 4:perl-5.8.8-43
On 22.11.2014 22:05, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
That's a lot of work, there's a much easier way
Just search your /var/log/maillog for user unknown messages, and
create email addresses for the unknown users which are showing up
multiple times over multiple days. It's a great trick because it gets
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:52:10 PM, you wrote:
RH> "perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64" is part of 5.11
RH> this is completly untested and unsupported < CentOS 5.11
Axb's "yum update -y" was done and I'm seeing-
Package 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64 already installed and latest vers
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 12:21:19 PM, you wrote:
A> is your SA 3.4 working now?
A> after all this noise it would be rewarding to see some success.
Mail is still being handled by our backup server but the primary is now
back in situ
Well the server was sitting on our dining tabl
30 matches
Mail list logo
