On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:47:41 +0200,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Do you trust smtp.cesky-hosting.cz?
> Even if it's open socks and http proxy server?
I wonder if slovensky-hosting.sk does better :-P
--
Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages.
Local Variables:
mode:c
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:19:10 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist:
> > On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before
> >> reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead
nevermind - *.tld just works
misunderstood the documentation
BLOCKED: t...@crap.domain.tld.local
FINE:t...@crap.domain.tld.local.com
blacklist_from blacklist_from *.119
blacklist_from *.administrator
blacklist_from *.admin
blacklist_from *.adsl
blacklist_from *.arpa
blacklist_from *.bac
black
Hi
today i got a lot of backscatter / spam amplify to my
private email after some funny guy decided to forge
my sender and Microsoft Exchange still don't get to
check the RCPT before accept mail :-(
is there a easy way to at least block idiots with a from header
like below to save time for enter
On 09/30/2014 10:27 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Sep 30, 2014, at 11:41 AM, David Jones wrote:
From: Philip Prindeville
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:30 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Googlasi, blacklotus, etc.
I’m seeing spams like:
On Sep 30, 2014, at 11:41 AM, David Jones wrote:
>
>>
>> From: Philip Prindeville
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:30 PM
>> To: SpamAssassin
>> Subject: Googlasi, blacklotus, etc.
>
>> I’m seeing spams like:
>
>> http://pastebin.com/XXQrNURW
>
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, terrygalant.li...@fastest.cc wrote:
Chatting in #zimbra about this with one of their main devs,
DEV: SA config in 8.0.x and previous is an utter mess
ME: Oh, ipgrade to 8.5 to save headaches?
DEV: yeah, except spam training is broken in 8.5 for other reasons...
DEV: altho
Chatting in #zimbra about this with one of their main devs,
DEV: SA config in 8.0.x and previous is an utter mess
ME: Oh, ipgrade to 8.5 to save headaches?
DEV: yeah, except spam training is broken in 8.5 for other reasons...
DEV: although it's trivial to fix
DEV: https://bugzilla.zimbra.com/sh
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, terrygalant.li...@fastest.cc wrote:
This is looking like a ZImbra-specific issue. Is it?
Seems to be. It doesn't seem to be processing the learning corpora
mailboxes.
Is that process scheduled or real-time? If scheduled, is the schedule
broken?
MANUALLY FORGET, SYN
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, terrygalant.li...@fastest.cc wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 10:57 AM, John Hardin wrote:
Did you run the above as user zimbra?
This time it is,
su - zimbra
$ /opt/zimbra/libexec/sa-learn --dbpath /opt/zimbra/data/amavisd/.spamassassin
--dump magic
0.000 0
This is looking like a ZImbra-specific issue. Is it?
MANUALLY FORGET, SYNC, DUMP
/opt/zimbra/libexec/sa-learn -D \
-p /opt/zimbra/conf/sa/sausers.cf \
--dbpath /opt/zimbra/data/amavisd/.spamassassin \
--siteconfigpath /opt/zimbra/conf/spamassassin \
--
Hi
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 10:57 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> > http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_MTA#Anti-Spam_Training_Filters
>
> Okay, since it's a packaged solution most of my concerns don't apply. I
> would assume Zimbra would internally be Doing the Right Thing.
Which is primarily why I u
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, terrygalant.li...@fastest.cc wrote:
Hi John
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 10:11 AM, John Hardin wrote:
How are you training your Bayes database?
By submitting the emails to a spam-training email address @ my Zimbra server,
http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_MTA#Anti-Spam_Tr
>
> From: Philip Prindeville
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:30 PM
> To: SpamAssassin
> Subject: Googlasi, blacklotus, etc.
> I’m seeing spams like:
> http://pastebin.com/XXQrNURW
> Notice:
> * the message is almost always text/plain single part
On Sep 30, 2014, at 11:11 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> How are you training your Bayes database?
>
> How much have you trained it? It requires a certain minimum amount of both
> spam *and* ham before it starts evaluating messages.
I have a significantly trained DB and I get the same thing... lots
Hi John
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 10:11 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> How are you training your Bayes database?
By submitting the emails to a spam-training email address @ my Zimbra server,
http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_MTA#Anti-Spam_Training_Filters
> How much have you trained it? It requires
I’m seeing spams like:
http://pastebin.com/XXQrNURW
Notice:
* the message is almost always text/plain single part;
* the only Received: line is the local one, even though it was received on port
25;
* the message id contains the string be2aaf2163fd72c9975ec76b00288831, which
seems to be a SHA1
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, terrygalant.li...@fastest.cc wrote:
I use SA
spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.4.0
running on Perl version 5.14.2
but in almost ALL cases, report
BAYES_50=0.8
How do I fix it?
How are you training your Bayes databa
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:16:28 +0200
A. Schulze wrote:
> I wonder why RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP and RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS fire up.
> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS tell me
>This check tests the IP address of the *last untrusted relay*
>
> for me the last untrusted relay *
Am 30.09.2014 um 02:40 schrieb Lorenzo Thurman:
> I looked at those emails again and tried to resolve the sender’s addresses
> (dig -x z.z.z.z). They don’t resolve to
> valid hostnames, which means they should even reach SA. Postfix should reject
> them outright. I’ve changed a couple
> of postf
Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
Do you trust smtp.cesky-hosting.cz?
Even if it's open socks and http proxy server?
No, I don't.
But I initially wonder why sa looked up the external submission host
while docu say "last untrusted relay" which it isn't.
Andreas
On 29.09.14 20:16, A. Schulze wrote:
today I was pointed to a message with these headers:
X-Spam-Score: 6.789
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.789 tag=-999 tag2=5 kill=6
tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_MIMEOLE=1.843,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP=2.499, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS=2.443]
Received: from
22 matches
Mail list logo
