On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:19:10 +0200 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
> > Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: > > On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > >> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before > >> reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead the > >> list-folder :-) > > > > Please teach your users to filter on the List-ID: header rather than > > Subject: for this list. The issue can be entirely avoided without > > requiring everyone else in the world to alter their behaviour > > the [SPAM] marker comes *before* all other sieve-filters > otherwise it would not catch faked From-Headers > > it's not a big deal but i see that mistake sometimes > also in business communication - not real good > I do not see any subject lines in this thread with [SPAM] in them. I rarely see them in this list at all. (I suspect people are aware it can cause some poorer filtering implementations to delete them.) Perhaps you need to look closer to home for this problem? Meantime, it is highly recommended that, if someone subscribes to a list about spam, one MUST make an exception to their filtering rules as previously mentioned. It's also very sensible. It is ridiculous to insist that people talking about spam stop using the word "spam". jd
