On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:59:03 +0200
Simon Loewenthal top-posted:
> RW wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:47:20 +0200
> >Simon Loewenthal wrote:
> >> * 2.0 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
> >>
> >>
> >> Does anyone know the rational behind this,
> >
> >So it wont hit Dear Bob
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
>
>But more importantly, it's because we do not have have the rule
>hit statistics from your email ..
Which has been on my personal backlog for over a year. (It is self-serving &
should have a higher priority thus) .
On 10/25, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 10:47 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
> >* 2.0 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
> >
> >Does anyone know the rational behind this, or is our user base simply
> >communicating on a higher level? :) I imagine the rational is sound, but I
>
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:59:03 +0200
Simon Loewenthal wrote:
> Except for formal letters to administrative addresses.
> Dear Bob was a frivolous and incorrect example. It is really Sir/Madam
Here's an argument for *not* making your email address "fi...@example.com",
"l...@example.com" or something
Except for formal letters to administrative addresses.
Dear Bob was a frivolous and incorrect example. It is really Sir/Madam
As Alex noted, I coils score it lower,bit am concerned on the overall effect.
I'lltest first.
Cheers.
RW wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:47:20 +0200
>Simon Loewenthal w
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:47:20 +0200
Simon Loewenthal wrote:
>
> Evening all,
>
> A great majority of our ham starts with Dear Sir/ Dear Madam / Dear
> Bob.
>
> Therefore I've always wondered why this this is scored so highly:
>
> * 2.0 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
>
>
>
Hi all,
Simon, I had some FPs because of this rule and because my threshold is
lower than 5.
I just had a score override to lower it but this rule still hist a lot
of spam (419 scams essentially).
You may want to fine tune the score according to your specific FPs.
Regards,
Alex, from prypiat.
On 10/25/2012 10:47 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
Evening all,
A great majority of our ham starts with Dear Sir/ Dear Madam / Dear Bob.
Therefore I've always wondered why this this is scored so highly:
* 2.0 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
Does anyone know the rational behind
Evening all,
A great majority of our ham starts with Dear Sir/ Dear Madam / Dear Bob.
Therefore I've always wondered why this this is scored so highly:
* 2.0 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
Does anyone know the rational behind this, or is our user base simply
communicating
On 10/24/2012 8:52 PM, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
for the sa-learn with --mbox http://pastebin.com/T0MtyN2J for the
sa-learn w/o --mbox http://pastebin.com/pD7kuEsZ expires in a day. joe a.
Without --mbox, archive iterator is seeing things as one giant email.
Oct 24 19:52:51.383 [10586] info: arc
On 10/24/2012 11:14 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
To do sa-update with the default channel and the saught channel, I have a
cron job that does:
/usr/bin/sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org --channel
updates.spamassassin.org
No, just grabbing a channel once will not
11 matches
Mail list logo
