At 3/30/2012 03:32 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/30/12 2:26 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
I'd argue that their inability to offer a functional opt-out is
bordering on spam-support.
months ago, it was non functional (you needed to join, which gave
them permission to spam you in order to opt-out)
th
>>> On 3/31/2012 at 6:27 PM, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:17:52 -0400
> joea wrote:
>
>
>> Beyond that, where can I find the difference, in a SPAM learning
>> sense, between "sa-learn --spam filename" and "spamassassin -r <
>> filename"?
>>
>> If I do the sa-learn on the same file, after
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:17:52 -0400
joea wrote:
> Beyond that, where can I find the difference, in a SPAM learning
> sense, between "sa-learn --spam filename" and "spamassassin -r <
> filename"?
>
> If I do the sa-learn on the same file, after doing spamassassin, it
> tells me 0 tokens. If I then
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, joea wrote:
On 3/31/2012 at 8:22 AM, Michael Scheidell
wrote:
if you need help, you need enough full information.
Or, you make the pastebin 'private', and send the link offlist to
someone who has volunteered to help. . . . .
If there are more volunteers, beyond the p
31.3.2012 19:17, joea kirjoitti:
> Beyond that, where can I find the difference, in a SPAM learning sense,
> between "sa-learn --spam filename" and "spamassassin -r < filename"?
>
> If I do the sa-learn on the same file, after doing spamassassin, it tells me
> 0 tokens.
> If I then do "sa-learn -
Post what you feel. The ML will help if they can. You can replace IPs and
domains etc.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
On Mar 31, 2012, at 11:19 AM, "joea" wrote:
On 3/31/2012 at 8:22 AM, Michael Scheidell
> wrote:
>> On 3/31/12 8:04 AM, joea wrote:
>>> starting below my local and MP details? Ho
>>> On 3/31/2012 at 8:22 AM, Michael Scheidell
wrote:
> On 3/31/12 8:04 AM, joea wrote:
>> starting below my local and MP details? Hopefully, the latter, as the
> former leaves me feeling a bit exposed.
>>
> we already know everything you think you want to hide.
Well, let's hope not . . .
>
On 3/31/12 8:04 AM, joea wrote:
starting below my local and MP details? Hopefully, the latter, as the former
leaves me feeling a bit exposed.
we already know everything you think you want to hide.
if you need help, you need enough full information.
Or, you make the pastebin 'private', and s
. . .
> That's very little information to go on.
Sorry. We learn as we go.
> Posting samples (with _all_ headers intact) on a pastebin or on a personal
> website so we can see them might yield some advice or new rules. Please
> don't send samples to the list, just the URLs where the samples
