On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:17:52 -0400 joea wrote:
> Beyond that, where can I find the difference, in a SPAM learning > sense, between "sa-learn --spam filename" and "spamassassin -r < > filename"? > > If I do the sa-learn on the same file, after doing spamassassin, it > tells me 0 tokens. If I then do "sa-learn --forget filename", then > "sa-learn --spam filename" it tells me 1 token learned. Are you sure that's what it says and not tokens from 1 message? The reason I ask is that it's practically impossible for Bayes to find only one token, so it would be a sign that something is wrong if some part of spamassassin is telling you that. > I infer from this they perform similar or the same function, from a > Bayes sense. spamassassin -r is mainly for reporting spam to SpamCop, Pyzor, etc, training Bayes is just a side-effect. But there's no grounds for thinking the training is going to be any different to running sa-learn or auto-training.
