morning list
Please could you advise as to how I would match this charset (iso-8859-1)
I would like to include it as part of a meta-test for phishing
however, my attempts have failed.
a queued message shows
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0918654631=="
MIME-Version: 1.
(sorry for this 'thread up')
-- --
I wrote..
..[cut]..
And now the real answer to you Martin..
I cannot write tons of "meta __FLAG_X (!THIS_RULE && !THIS_OTHER_RULE && ..)"
I need some sort of match like "if AllFiredRules in (RuleA, RuleB, RuleC, ...) ->
raise __FLAG_Y".
And some like .. "if
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Bowie Bailey,
>
> Am 2012-03-01 10:52:03, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
>> Ok. What was the error message? I don't recall you showing an error
>> message that mentioned SA.
> Currently I am not in my office and do not know exatly the content, but
> the MAILER-DA
On 3/1/2012 1:25 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Bowie Bailey,
>
> Am 2012-03-01 10:52:03, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
>> Ok. What was the error message? I don't recall you showing an error
>> message that mentioned SA.
>
> Currently I am not in my office and do not know exatly the content,
Hello Bowie Bailey,
Am 2012-03-01 10:52:03, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Ok. What was the error message? I don't recall you showing an error
> message that mentioned SA.
Currently I am not in my office and do not know exatly the content, but
the MAILER-DAEMON message had included 6-8 line
On 3/1/2012 10:10 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> That sounds like an MTA configuration. Why do you think it is related
>> to SA?
>
> Because the error messages are based on SA values.
Ok. What was the error message? I don't recall you showing an error
message that mentioned SA.
--
Bowie
Hello RW,
Am 2012-02-25 22:42:47, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> I think that this is pretty conclusive that it's nothing to do with
> Spamassassin. It doesn't look anything like what I'd expect for a
> Spamassassin-based rejection. I looks like some basic MTA check.
>
> Another thing is tha
Hello Bowie Bailey,
Am 2012-02-27 11:00:03, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Ok. So you DO have rDNS, just not a customized one. That should not
> cause problems in most cases.
Right but this conflicts wit SSL certs
> That sounds like an MTA configuration. Why do you think it is related
> to