Hello RW, Am 2012-02-25 22:42:47, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > I think that this is pretty conclusive that it's nothing to do with > Spamassassin. It doesn't look anything like what I'd expect for a > Spamassassin-based rejection. I looks like some basic MTA check. > > Another thing is that it's failing to find an A-record, so nothing to > do with rDNS either.
Why should I have an A-Record for my <work1> if it can not public
accessed? I do not know a singel MTA (like courier, exim, postfix,
Exchange, MSMTP) which does recursive A-Record checks on Received:
Headers.
> Have you checked to see if you are sending mail with
> an @work1.intranet1.tamay-dogan.net address in the smtp envelope.
Yes, ant ist seems to be correctly.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux
Internet Service Provider, Cloud Computing
<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/>
itsystems@tdnet Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de
Owner Michelle Konzack
Gewerbe Strasse 3 Tel office: +49-176-86004575
77694 Kehl Tel mobil: +49-177-9351947
Germany Tel mobil: +33-6-61925193 (France)
USt-ID: DE 278 049 239
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
