On 3/1/2012 1:25 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Bowie Bailey, > > Am 2012-03-01 10:52:03, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: >> Ok. What was the error message? I don't recall you showing an error >> message that mentioned SA. > > Currently I am not in my office and do not know exatly the content, but > the MAILER-DAEMON message had included 6-8 lines with the reject reason > which came from SA and a link how I have to correct the error with my > mailserver <work1.intranet1.tamay-dogan.net>. > > If you look into my previos mail (or this one) you see, I send from > <work1> to <storage000> using a trusted connection (192.168.0.x) without > authentication and then use auth-smtp to send the mail to my public > <mail> relay. > > This is a standard setup > > Since <mail.tamay-dogan.net> is the MX for <tamay-dogan.net>, no > receiving MTA should reject the mail.
Right. I saw the info on your setup, but the only thing I remember seeing about the actual message you got back was a generic error that sounded like it would have come from the MTA rather than SA. > Some minutes ago, I have gotten a message from someone, which told me, > that maybe the receiving MTA has a custom SA rules which check wrongly > the Received: headers recursively... That is definitely a possibility. That's why I asked for the exact error. If it gives us any indication of what rules are firing, we will have a much better idea of what the problem is. -- Bowie
