On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 21:25:08 UTC, michael.scheid...@secnap.com
confabulated:
> On 2/21/12 4:09 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> Den 2012-02-21 16:29, Duane Hill skrev:
>>
>>>
>>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AWL.html
>>>
>>>
>>
>> 3.3.x have it
On 2/21/12 4:09 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-02-21 16:29, Duane Hill skrev:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AWL.html
3.3.x have it enabled so this url is okay :-)
use_auto_whitelist ( 0 | 1 ) (default: 1)
this line is to disable it pr user i
Den 2012-02-21 16:42, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral skrev:
[8409] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based get_addr_entry: found existing
entry for mailer-daemon@X|ip=XX.YY
ipv4/16 mask is in use, try change it to ipv4/24 or ipv4/32
So, its AWL deprecated? Is better solution remove the addresses from
Den 2012-02-21 16:29, Duane Hill skrev:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AWL.html
3.3.x have it enabled so this url is okay :-)
use_auto_whitelist ( 0 | 1 ) (default: 1)
this line is to disable it pr user in user_prefs, the plugin is still
enabled in
Den 2012-02-21 16:28, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral skrev:
0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is
sa-learn --spam from all that bounce msgs could help
-4.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the
AWL is not a whitelist with static scores for ham and spam, it
On 2/21/2012 7:33 AM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:46:53 -0600 (CST)
Dave Funk wrote:
I'm confused. The man page for spamc seems to imply that if I use
the "--headers" option with spamc it will only return the headers,
it will omit the body.
I've not looked at the code, but my reading is t
On 2/21/2012 11:21 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
> So, if I have a lot of spam getting negative score from AWL, the
> problem was
> that in previous moment these spam was not classified as "spam"
> (getting high score) and in conclusion AWL understand that is a legal
> sender?
>
> Sorry if
So, if I have a lot of spam getting negative score from AWL, the problem was
that in previous moment these spam was not classified as "spam" (getting
high score) and in conclusion AWL understand that is a legal sender?
Sorry if this cuestion is trivial :-( I am not pretty sure
if I am understandin
On 2/21/2012 10:42 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
> I know that Bayes and AWL are different thinks, but I think that if
> your non-spam
> thresold is low (-0.001 in my case) mails classified are non spam
> could be false positives. [1]
> It doesnt affect to the AWL table? I think that AWL has
I know that Bayes and AWL are different thinks, but I think that if your
non-spam
thresold is low (-0.001 in my case) mails classified are non spam could be
false positives. [1]
It doesnt affect to the AWL table? I think that AWL has auto-learn...
[8409] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based get_addr_ent
On 2/21/2012 10:11 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm afraid this is yet another thread about Auto white lists module
> :-( Sorry if this question is yet
> solved on the list.
>
> I have a lot of Spam and backscatter throwing high spam score on my
> actual spam assassin system (
On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 15:18:30 UTC, michael.scheid...@secnap.com
confabulated:
> On 2/21/12 10:11 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
>> rule AWL is triggered with a negative score. Reading the documentation
>> I think that the problem
>> was a wrong auto-learn thresold for HAM, the
Hi Michael, thank you for your quick reply.
For example, this is a report for a mail tagged as non spam:
Content analysis details: (3.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.0 BAYES_50
On 2/21/12 10:11 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
rule AWL is triggered with a negative score. Reading the documentation
I think that the problem
was a wrong auto-learn thresold for HAM, the first week the system
starts to work. The initial
thresold for Ham was -0.001 and I think that this t
Hi all!
I'm afraid this is yet another thread about Auto white lists module :-(
Sorry if this question is yet
solved on the list.
I have a lot of Spam and backscatter throwing high spam score on my actual
spam assassin system (postfix,
spamassassin with amavisd-new and Maia). Tracing these messag
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:46:53 -0600 (CST)
Dave Funk wrote:
> I'm confused. The man page for spamc seems to imply that if I use
> the "--headers" option with spamc it will only return the headers,
> it will omit the body.
I've not looked at the code, but my reading is that it's not an output
option
16 matches
Mail list logo
