On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 15:18:30 UTC, michael.scheid...@secnap.com confabulated:
> On 2/21/12 10:11 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote: >> rule AWL is triggered with a negative score. Reading the documentation >> I think that the problem >> was a wrong auto-learn thresold for HAM, the first week the system >> starts to work. The initial >> thresold for Ham was -0.001 and I think that this thresold causes a >> lot of spam and backscatter addresses >> was learned as non-spam addresses. Could be possible? >> > and, this is one reason why awl is deprecated, and disabled by default > in all new SA installations for (2 years? someone correct me on the time?) http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AWL.html ... use_auto_whitelist ( 0 | 1 ) (default: 1) Does that mean docs haven't changed to reflect yet? > Q: if you did not have that negative score, would you have marked those > emails as spam? if answer is yes, disable AWL. > also, since you are using amavisd-new, you might want to ask specific > (non AWL) questions on their mailing list about backscatter. they have > a solution that might work better than AWL. -- If at first you don't succeed... ...so much for skydiving.
