Re: ok, we all get spam.. but.. spam warning us we opted out?

On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote: > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 19:41 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > "Hello, I’m Brenda Hudson, Dell Director of Emerging Business. > > > > Soon, we’ll be sending our Dell Customer Experience Survey. Your > > opinion is valuable to us and your feedback

Re: ok, we all get spam.. but.. spam warning us we opted out?

On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 19:41 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > "Hello, I’m Brenda Hudson, Dell Director of Emerging Business. > > Soon, we’ll be sending our Dell Customer Experience Survey. Your > opinion is valuable to us and your feedback will help directly > influence the areas where Dell can dr

Re: ok, we all get spam.. but.. spam warning us we opted out?

On 2011/07/26 16:41, Michael Scheidell wrote: I really don't like to make fun of most spammers. they can't spell, and can't make an honest living at anything but tricking 13 yr olds into downloading prn. But, this one is too funny to pass by. Needless to say, I am not posting the whole thing, j

ok, we all get spam.. but.. spam warning us we opted out?

I really don't like to make fun of most spammers. they can't spell, and can't make an honest living at anything but tricking 13 yr olds into downloading prn. But, this one is too funny to pass by. Needless to say, I am not posting the whole thing, just the funnyest part. "Hello, I'm Brenda H

Re: solved: Re: broken emails from techtarget/crn mag? omeda communications?

Le 26/07/2011 01:57, Michael Scheidell a écrit : > On 7/22/11 12:49 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> On 7/22/11 12:08 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: >>> On 7/22/11 12:04 PM, Bret Miller wrote: Well, I don't actually subscribe to any active techtarget lists, but I do still get marketing garba

Re: broken emails from techtarget/crn mag? omeda communications?

Le 22/07/2011 17:50, Michael Scheidell a écrit : > any of you subscribed to techtarget or crm emails? > > seems on june 16th or 17th, something broke. and I am trying to > determine if its something we did or something they did. no, it's much older than that. I can see a borked one dating back to

Re: Beginner's question on DCC (SOLVED)

On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:15:04 +0100, RW wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:53:51 + (UTC) Walter Hurry wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am setting up Spamassassin on my home laptop, primarily as a learning >> exercise. I am mainly following the cookbook at >>

Re: FuzzyOCR

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM, John Hardin wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote: > >>> polloxx, hit this URL; I remember seeing various patches for FuzzyOCR to >>> address this. >>> >>> >>> http://www.google.com/search?q=fuzzyocr+2048+%22insecure+dependency%22+patch >> >> Thanks John, I'v

Re: Low score on mail with typical spam content

On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:49:50 -0700 (PDT) Daniel Lemke wrote: > Ummh, thanks for the hint, copied the wrong sample :) (removed some > header information by myself to test something…) > This is the right one: http://pastebin.com/Cmu15YY2 BTW your local rule JAM_REPLACED_I_BD doesn't seem to be w

Re: Low score on mail with typical spam content

On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 01:49 -0700, Daniel Lemke wrote: > Ummh, thanks for the hint, copied the wrong sample :) (removed some header > information by myself to test something…) > This is the right one: http://pastebin.com/Cmu15YY2 > Exactly the same remarks (and identical score!) apply to this one

Re: Low score on mail with typical spam content

On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 00:21 -0700, Daniel Lemke wrote: > Hi there, > > A few days ago a mail passed our SpamAssassin and I was a bit surprised when > I looked at the mail content. > It does contain typical spam words like ‘drug’ etc. > Actually, it contains very little that might not appear in an

Re: Low score on mail with typical spam content

On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Daniel Lemke wrote: > > Hi there, > > A few days ago a mail passed our SpamAssassin and I was a bit > surprised when I looked at the mail content. > It does contain typical spam words like ‘drug’ etc. > Mail content can be found on pastebin: http://pasteb

Re: Low score on mail with typical spam content

Axb wrote: > > What's wrong in the word "drug"? > It's regularly used in medicine, science, press, etc. > If that's a "spam word" for you, nothing prevents you from writing a > rule to score that word.. (not really wise) > I accept that the word drug itself does not tag the mail as spam as the

Re: Low score on mail with typical spam content

On 2011-07-26 9:21, Daniel Lemke wrote: Hi there, A few days ago a mail passed our SpamAssassin and I was a bit surprised when I looked at the mail content. It does contain typical spam words like ‘drug’ etc. Mail content can be found on pastebin: http://pastebin.com/k8xptZbd If blacklist and B

Low score on mail with typical spam content

Hi there, A few days ago a mail passed our SpamAssassin and I was a bit surprised when I looked at the mail content. It does contain typical spam words like ‘drug’ etc. Mail content can be found on pastebin: http://pastebin.com/k8xptZbd If blacklist and Bayes score are not included in spam score