Axb wrote: > > What's wrong in the word "drug"? > It's regularly used in medicine, science, press, etc. > If that's a "spam word" for you, nothing prevents you from writing a > rule to score that word.. (not really wise) > I accept that the word drug itself does not tag the mail as spam as the whole concept of SpamAssassin is based on only giving small scores. But I would at least have expected it to detect words like 'drug', 'potency' and so on. It's ok to manually adjust the scores when necessary but the filter should already have included rules for detecting spam signs like this (like it’s done with HTML_MESSAGE BODY which does score 0 by default).
> As there is not SA markup in that sample so I'm assuming this was never > passed through Spamassassin. > Ummh, thanks for the hint, copied the wrong sample :) (removed some header information by myself to test something…) This is the right one: http://pastebin.com/Cmu15YY2 Thanks! Daniel -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Low-score-on-mail-with-typical-spam-content-tp32137871p32138336.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
