DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1 bug ?

missing meta on DKIM_VALID when DKIM_ADSP_ALL ? header testing ___DKIM_ADSP_ALL eval:test() meta DKIM_ADSP_ALL (__DKIM_ADSP_ALL && !DKIM_VALID) or is it just checking with DKIM_VALID_AU ? how to solve it ?

Re: How to test RBL

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:37:03 +0100, Niamh Holding wrote: sdd> how can I test whether the spamassassin query is sent to the RBL at all. tcpdump? or if you have bind running rndc querylog

Re: How to test RBL

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:48:28 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: IF YOU ASK FOR HELP, FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS. he asked for vacation with you :-)

Re: How to test RBL

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:07:44 +0200, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: # dig 18.151.139.61.rbl.cdubitterfeld.de @213.186.33.99 add +norecurse

Re: How to test RBL

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:37:00 +0200, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: Am 13.06.2011 21:18, schrieb John Hardin: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: Let's take this step-by-step. Please post the contents of the file /etc/resolv.conf on your SA host. nameserver 213.186.33.99 nam

Re: How to test RBL

Am 13.06.2011 21:18, schrieb John Hardin: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: Let's take this step-by-step. Please post the contents of the file /etc/resolv.conf on your SA host. nameserver 213.186.33.99 nameserver 208.67.222.222 nameserver 208.67.220.220 nameserver 85.214.73

Re: Sought rules

"Karsten Bräckelmann" wrote in message news:1307971023.4766.8.camel@monkey... On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 13:21 +0200, Jezz wrote: > Yes, works. Regardless of using symlinks, a copy of the cf file, or > include'ing it from another config file -- the target will be read > again. > > But don't just t

Re: How to test RBL

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: Am 13.06.2011 20:48, schrieb Michael Scheidell: On 6/13/11 2:42 PM, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: > un 13 20:31:30.909 [4595] dbg: async: starting: DNSBL-A, > dns:A:80.134.171.80.rbl.domain.de. (timeout 15.0s, min 3.0s) 'timeout 15.0 s' b

Re: How to test RBL

Am 13.06.2011 20:48, schrieb Michael Scheidell: On 6/13/11 2:42 PM, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: un 13 20:31:30.909 [4595] dbg: async: starting: DNSBL-A, dns:A:80.134.171.80.rbl.domain.de. (timeout 15.0s, min 3.0s) 'timeout 15.0 s' because you didn't do like I said. you must test the rbl by

Re: How to test RBL

On 6/13/11 2:42 PM, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: un 13 20:31:30.909 [4595] dbg: async: starting: DNSBL-A, dns:A:80.134.171.80.rbl.domain.de. (timeout 15.0s, min 3.0s) 'timeout 15.0 s' because you didn't do like I said. you must test the rbl by hand, using the FIRST SERVER IN /ETC/RESOLV.CON

Re: How to test RBL

Am 13.06.2011 16:37, schrieb Niamh Holding: Hello Sebastian, Monday, June 13, 2011, 12:30:00 PM, you wrote: sdd> how can I test whether the spamassassin query is sent to the RBL at all. tcpdump? Hi, spamassassin took a look on the rbl. If i test the rbl by using "dig": dig 18.151.139.6

Re: Sought rules

On 6/10/2011 8:01 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > Until the frequent re-scoring and stock rules updates are working > properly, you will have to use the dedicated channel, if you want the > SOUGHT rules. And even after that, if you want the freshest patterns, > you still need the sought channel

Re: How to test RBL

Hello Sebastian, Monday, June 13, 2011, 12:30:00 PM, you wrote: sdd> how can I test whether the spamassassin query is sent to the RBL at all. tcpdump? -- Best regards, Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk pgpMPK1WkVYpc.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: How to test RBL: typo corrected

try spamassassin -T -D < testmail 2>&1 | less That way, you can search the output for the RBL lines. regards Tom Apologies : should read lowercase t spamassassin -t -D < testmail 2>&1 | less Tom

Re: How to test RBL

On 13/06/2011 13:30, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: Hi, how can I test whether the spamassassin query is sent to the RBL at all. I suspect that the query is not transacted. try spamassassin -T -D < testmail 2>&1 | less That way, you can search the output for the RBL lines. regards Tom

Re: Sought rules

On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 13:21 +0200, Jezz wrote: > > Yes, works. Regardless of using symlinks, a copy of the cf file, or > > include'ing it from another config file -- the target will be read > > again. > > > > But don't just take my word for it -- see for yourself! > > > > spamassassin --lint -D co

Re: How to test RBL

On 6/13/11 7:30 AM, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: Hi, how can I test whether the spamassassin query is sent to the RBL at all. I suspect that the query is not transacted. Test your DNS first. make sure that at command line, the target in question exists in the RBL. Test it from the same box

Re: BOTNET IPv6 patch

13.6.2011 14:51, Matthew Newton kirjoitti: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:44:19AM +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> 11.6.2011 0:41, Matthew Newton kirjoitti: >>> >>> I've therefore hacked together the following patch to Botnet.pm >>> (0.8). It should fix the main issue that BOTNET does not d

Re: BOTNET IPv6 patch

Hi, On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:44:19AM +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > 11.6.2011 0:41, Matthew Newton kirjoitti: > > > > I've therefore hacked together the following patch to Botnet.pm > > (0.8). It should fix the main issue that BOTNET does not do any > > lookups for IP addresses that look

How to test RBL

Hi, how can I test whether the spamassassin query is sent to the RBL at all. I suspect that the query is not transacted. Thx Sebastian

Re: Sought rules

"Karsten Bräckelmann" wrote in message news:1307824487.4844.55.camel@monkey... Yes, works. Regardless of using symlinks, a copy of the cf file, or include'ing it from another config file -- the target will be read again. But don't just take my word for it -- see for yourself! spamassassin