On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a friend that puts out a 'barter' list. He acts as a clearinghouse
for some equipment wholesalers.
He has been fighting getting tagged as spamming for some time and finally
came to me for help.
Oh, and I am looking at setting up a mailman
>>
>> I have a friend that puts out a 'barter' list. He acts as a
>> clearinghouse for some equipment wholesalers.
>>
>> He has been fighting getting tagged as spamming for some time and
>> finally came to me for help. I had helped some, but finally told him to
>> add me to his distributio
I have a friend that puts out a 'barter' list. He acts as a
clearinghouse for some equipment wholesalers.
He has been fighting getting tagged as spamming for some time and
finally came to me for help. I had helped some, but finally told him to
add me to his distribution (he uses BCC lists; h
On 3/8/2011 4:46 PM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> I'll never grasp why one would use one of those in mail.
Many legitimate social networks auto-generate shortened URLs. These then
get copied into e-mails... sometimes in automated ways, sometimes via
people copying a twitter post (or whatever) and t
On 03/08/2011 01:46 PM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> I'll never grasp why one would use one of those in mail.
Many shortened links allow you to anonymously track click-throughs
(clicks-through?), e.g. adding a plus sign to any bit.ly or j.mp URI
will bring anybody to the stats (and target) of the li
On 2011-03-08 22:28, Joseph Brennan wrote:
http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=Spamhaus%20DBL#291
quote,
One way to address this problem would have been to treat URL shortener
domains the same way as any other spammed domain and include them in our
main DBL zone. But, as ment
http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=Spamhaus%20DBL#291
quote,
One way to address this problem would have been to treat URL shortener
domains the same way as any other spammed domain and include them in our
main DBL zone. But, as mentioned, most of these URL shortener serve
On 2011-03-08 22:12, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On 3/8/2011 9:58 AM, Bill Landry wrote:
FYI: "Spamhaus created a new "URL shortener/redirector" zone in the
DBL." See:
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=667
Will Spamassassin be adding support for this new DBL
shortener/redirector response
On 3/8/2011 9:58 AM, Bill Landry wrote:
FYI: "Spamhaus created a new "URL shortener/redirector" zone in the
DBL." See:
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=667
Will Spamassassin be adding support for this new DBL
shortener/redirector response code?:
127.0.1.3 spammed redirector domain
F
On Mar 8, 2011, at 3:07 PM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> Dunno if mirrors are beign served the same data atm.. seems so.
My mirror is also commented out.
Chris
--
-
Chris Owen - Garden City (620) 275-1900 - Lottery (
On 03/08, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> http://pastebin.com/CdDPHnTX
It doesn't look like it's working.
$ host dbltest.com.dbl.spamhaus.org
dbltest.com.dbl.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.1.2
Good.
$ host rdrct.us.dbl.spamhaus.org
Host rdrct.us.dbl.spamhaus.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
$ host acces
On 03/08, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
> eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR')
Thanks. Looks like the way to go about getting this in SA is opening a bug
to get it tested via mass checks, so I did:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6550
--
"Force, my friends, is violence
On 2011-03-08 20:58, Bill Landry wrote:
FYI: "Spamhaus created a new "URL shortener/redirector" zone in the
DBL." See:
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=667
Will Spamassassin be adding support for this new DBL
shortener/redirector response code?:
127.0.1.3 spammed redirector domain
F
On 08/03/2011 5:12 PM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 2011-03-08 21:24, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Looks like that would be something like this?
urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR dbl.spamhaus.org. A
127.0.1.3
bodyURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR
eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_S
On 2011-03-08 21:24, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Looks like that would be something like this?
urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR dbl.spamhaus.org. A 127.0.1.3
bodyURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_SPAM')
describeURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR Contai
On 08/03/2011 4:54 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Looks like that would be something like this?
urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR dbl.spamhaus.org. A 127.0.1.3
bodyURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_SPAM')
describeURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR Cont
Looks like that would be something like this?
urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR dbl.spamhaus.org. A 127.0.1.3
bodyURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_SPAM')
describeURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR Contains a URL listed in the DBL as a
spammed redirector d
FYI: "Spamhaus created a new "URL shortener/redirector" zone in the
DBL." See:
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=667
Will Spamassassin be adding support for this new DBL
shortener/redirector response code?:
127.0.1.3 spammed redirector domain
For details, see:
http://www
Margrit Lottmann wrote:
-0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
1.0 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
0.5 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header
1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
-0.0 NO_RECEI
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/8/11 10:45 AM, Margrit Lottmann wrote:
Already sometimes we've had problems with
false positives
Mails get spam scores > 5 ...internal mails with normal content...
you need to correctly set internal and trusted networks.
if that is cor
On 3/8/11 10:45 AM, Margrit Lottmann wrote:
Already sometimes we've had problems with
false positives
Mails get spam scores > 5 ...internal mails with normal content...
you need to correctly set internal and trusted networks.
if that is correct, you need to fix your MTA.
use wirewhark to
Already sometimes we've had problems with
false positives
Mails get spam scores > 5 ...internal mails with normal content...
The spam report says
X-Spam-Score: 5.5 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Start SpamAssassin results
Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required)
p
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Adam Katz wrote:
Even if we don't change what "AWL" means,
Curious that in English "awl" is a tool of the shoe-maker (in italian
called "lesina" : since it was used to cut off tiny pieces, it even
generated a verb "lesinare" which means to save money at the point to be
s
Hello David B Funk,
Am 2011-03-07 18:18:48, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Even more fun:
>
> # host vserver4.tamay-dogan.net.
> Host vserver4.tamay-dogan.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
>
> fix that reverse map for 217.147.94.23 and I bet you will be happier.
:-/
Thanks, Greetings and nice Da
Hello Marcin Mirosław,
Am 2011-03-07 14:08:01, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Please look at it:
> $ host -t mx tamay-dogan.net
> tamay-dogan.net mail is handled by 20 vserver04.tamay-dogan.net.
> $ host vserver04.tamay-dogan.net.
> vserver04.tamay-dogan.net has address 217.147.94.23
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
